Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
User avatar
RonnieRoots
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1981
Joined: 08:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: Middle Earth

Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by RonnieRoots »

I have the opportunity to let people bring one of these over to me. I've read some (mixed) reviews on the 1983, but none on the 1982. Anyone had one of these recently? Opinions?
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by DRT »

RonnieRoots wrote: Opinions?
1. You live in a desert
2. You need port
3. RP82/83 is port
4. No brainer :wink: :lol:
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
RonnieRoots
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1981
Joined: 08:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: Middle Earth

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by RonnieRoots »

DRT wrote:
RonnieRoots wrote: Opinions?
1. You live in a desert
2. You need port
3. RP82/83 is port
4. No brainer :wink: :lol:
Yes, you are obviously right, but are they actually any good? Or should I instruct our guests to keep searching for something different?
User avatar
mosesbotbol
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 598
Joined: 19:54 Wed 18 Jul 2007
Location: Boston, USA

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by mosesbotbol »

They're great if that's all that's available! I haven't had either, but have had a ton of RP 85. I would go for the 83.
F1 | Welsh Corgi | Did Someone Mention Port?
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3031
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by Andy Velebil »

Derek is right, you live in a dessert man...just drink :mrgreen: :lol:

Seriously, I'd go with 83. The 83 is quite decent...never had 82, but it was a very bad year for almost all in the Douro.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by jdaw1 »

The one 1982 I tasted, Noval, was poor. RP85 is delicious, especially for the price — I’ve had lots. RP83 is available, you live in a desert: do the obvious thing.
User avatar
Frederick Blais
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 170
Joined: 02:53 Wed 11 Jul 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Contact:

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by Frederick Blais »

Had the 83 quite a few times between 98 and 2004 and I always enjoyed it!
User avatar
Michael M.
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 244
Joined: 12:50 Wed 08 Aug 2007
Location: Germany

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by Michael M. »

Ronald, unfortunately no TN for 1982. But TN for 1983 here: http://www.thewinedoctor.com/portugal/ramospinto.shtml

According to my reserch prices for 1982 and 1983 do not vary very much. Because of the (generally spoken) far better vintage 1983 I would go in doubt for 1983.

Michael
Shut Up 'N Drink Yer Port
User avatar
RonnieRoots
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1981
Joined: 08:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: Middle Earth

Re: Ramos Pinto 1982 / 1983?

Post by RonnieRoots »

Thanks for all the replies! I decided to go for the 1983, should be a pleasant glass of port. With that we will also receive a Taylor (I'm guessing Vargellas) 1996. That should pull us through Ramadan! :wink:
Post Reply