these are being offered at 2,500 Euro per bottle. 2,500/14 = 178.57 Euro per glass DRT wrote:WOW.
According to a post onthese are being offered at 2,500 Euro per bottle. 2,500/14 = 178.57 Euro per glass
g-man wrote:Looks black as night though, I wonder what reconditioning they did to it.
I have seen every surviving wine invoice of Winston Churchill, and there wasn’t anything like this.Axel P wrote:with the exception of one pipe said to have been acquired by Winston Churchill
jdaw1 wrote:Axel P wrote:with the exception of one pipe said to have been acquired by Winston Churchill
I have seen every surviving wine invoice of Winston Churchill, and there wasn’t anything like this.
Glenn E. wrote:jdaw1 wrote:Axel P wrote:with the exception of one pipe said to have been acquired by Winston Churchill
I have seen every surviving wine invoice of Winston Churchill, and there wasn’t anything like this.
"Said to have been acquired by..." says, to me, that there are no longer records to that effect. Proof in the form of a surviving invoice would have shortened that sentence to simply "acquired by..." My guess is that they only have anecdotal evidence, possibly verbal, of any such transaction at this point.
DRT wrote:If one had a mischievous mind one might be contemplating the irony of Tayor Fladgate now selling an ancient ancestor to Graham's Six Grapes at £2,500 per bottle
JacobH wrote:I do wonder, though, why the decanter is quite so plain? If this is going into the same market as Remy Martin’s Louise XIII Cognac or Hennessy’s Ellipse, I’m surprised it doesn’t have a Victorian style hand-blown decanter.
Moving away from the marketing, does anyone else find it interesting that this is a family reserve colheita and therefore almost certainly a SQC (if that’s the right term...)? I suppose it must not be from a very famous Quinta, though, otherwise they would be saying where it came from...
While overall I think it's a very good product design and there will no doubt be buyers for it, I'd would rather skip all the very expensive and fancy packaging and use that extra €1,000 to buy a second bottle.
uncle tom wrote:The price, incidentally, is ridiculous. Sooner or later one or two will doubtless find their way into the auction rooms, and I doubt they will realise much more than 10% of the offer price.
How many 155-year old (all in wood) Colheitas can you currently purchase for 250 Euros?
Andresen's 1910 Colheita retails for 2000 Euros
uncle tom wrote:How many 155-year old (all in wood) Colheitas can you currently purchase for 250 Euros?
Last year I picked up a Loureiro 1871 for £160, and quite recently a merchant was trying to offload some Whitwham 1880's for not a lot more.
uncle tom wrote:Andresen's 1910 Colheita retails for 2000 Euros
- It's currently being offered by a retailer in California for $623..
uncle tom wrote:..there are always a few merchants trying to sell wines for way over the odds - hoping to catch the odd punter who has more money than sense.
And it seems to work - one such merchant whom I know well has just bought a Bentley..
Well, to continue the comparison, I don’t think the decanters Louis XIII used looked much like the Louis XIII decanter from Remy Martin...Perhaps this produce was slightly rushed out and they couldn’t get scratch made ones in time (or decided that it wasn’t worth the cost)? I’m surprised, though, that the decanter doesn’t even appear to be engraved. I would have thought for a trophy wine like this, having a fabulous decanter left over would be an important part of the packaging.Andy Velebil wrote:Two very good questions you raise. Personally, I agree about the decanter being so plain. IMO, it looks like the $12 one I bought this year at a discount store. But I'm sure there was a reason for this, maybe that was similar to decanters being used in Portugal at the time?????
I imagine that the legal situation with this is rather complex due to the age of the wine and the fact that it pre-dates most of the registering processes that go on for normal Ports. Presumably there are provisions for this within the IVDP’s procedures for dealing with things like this since there is quite a lot of old Port around (although perhaps not much as quite such an age). I’d still like to know which Quinta this is from, though!Andy Velebil wrote:As for the Colheita, the law allows a person to make a limited amount of Port to be consumed at home that doesn't have to be declared to the IVDP. So there are many small growers that have their own small stash of stuff that for one reason or another is still in barrel many decades later. That was probably why they called it SCION, as they can't legally put a year anywhere on the main label and sell it as a single year "colheita."
JacobH wrote:Perhaps this produce was slightly rushed out and they couldn’t get scratch made ones in time (or decided that it wasn’t worth the cost)? I’m surprised, though, that the decanter doesn’t even appear to be engraved. I would have thought for a trophy wine like this, having a fabulous decanter left over would be an important part of the packaging.Andy Velebil wrote:Personally, I agree about the decanter being so plain.
Glenn E. wrote:uncle tom wrote:How many 155-year old (all in wood) Colheitas can you currently purchase for 250 Euros?
Last year I picked up a Loureiro 1871 for £160, and quite recently a merchant was trying to offload some Whitwham 1880's for not a lot more.
So... none, then? Prices were lower last year and Scion wasn't available then.
I see a Loureiro for $600+ but no Whitwham 1880. I do see a Whitwham King Pedro, but they're half bottles.
RonnieRoots wrote:The story would be even better if they had found a lost barrel somewhere in the cellars of the Taylor's lodge.
Users browsing this forum: RonnieRoots and 2 guests