2014: the TPF blend
2014: the TPF blend
Attentive students of will already know that the 2014 harvest will be of excellent vintage quality.
Attentive students of will also know that 1963 Avery was a blend made by the wine merchant Avery’s, being one part Taylor to two parts Fonseca to three parts Sandeman.
Put these together.
Could we do our own 2014? Could we do a better 2014 blend? Buy a few dozen of the relevant components, mix, re-bottle, and apply our own labels? Of course the rotters at the IVDP (those who won’t let us buy the components in pipes) will have conniptions, which would be a small part of the pleasure. Would it be worthwhile? Are we confident that we can improve on the work of the professionals?
I don’t know — so far, these are questions.
Attentive students of will also know that 1963 Avery was a blend made by the wine merchant Avery’s, being one part Taylor to two parts Fonseca to three parts Sandeman.
Put these together.
Could we do our own 2014? Could we do a better 2014 blend? Buy a few dozen of the relevant components, mix, re-bottle, and apply our own labels? Of course the rotters at the IVDP (those who won’t let us buy the components in pipes) will have conniptions, which would be a small part of the pleasure. Would it be worthwhile? Are we confident that we can improve on the work of the professionals?
I don’t know — so far, these are questions.
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
Couldn't we corrupt an expert and bring them over to our side? Then we wouldn't just be standing in the kitchen swilling things about in demijohns. We'd be standing in a lab swilling things about in demijohns, and wearing white coats.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
It is a little early in the season to be sure about how each individual parcel will finish, but, based on the data so far available, I’m envisaging three parts Dow to two parts Quevedo to one part either Graham or Vesuvio. Does that seem wrong?
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
I am 100% confident that we cannot.jdaw1 wrote:Are we confident that we can improve on the work of the professionals?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
woudl it count if we were professional about it?DRT wrote:I am 100% confident that we cannot.jdaw1 wrote:Are we confident that we can improve on the work of the professionals?
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
But they have constraints that we would not; we would have tools that they do not.DRT wrote:I am 100% confident that we cannot.jdaw1 wrote:Are we confident that we can improve on the work of the professionals?
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
What would be the logistics involved Jdaw?
how will we agree upon the plan and also the bottling procedures?
how will we agree upon the plan and also the bottling procedures?
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
If the intention is to have fun creating a unique port that we can put our label on then it is a fun idea. If the intention is to make something that is better than is produced by the professionals it is a terrible idea that is certain to fail.
Perhaps a better idea would be to find a friendly supplier who would allow us to have some input to the blending of a volume of VP that could be labelled under our name?
Perhaps a better idea would be to find a friendly supplier who would allow us to have some input to the blending of a volume of VP that could be labelled under our name?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
The original suggestion was meant to be more Avery than Tesco.DRT wrote:Perhaps a better idea would be to find a friendly supplier who would allow us to have some input to the blending of a volume of VP that could be labelled under our name?
And there is nobody in Portugal able to blend Dow Quevedo Graham Fonseca Vesuvio Sandeman Taylor. We have tools they don’t.
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
Why not just wait for the next crappy Factory House Blend?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
Channelling the spirit of Tesco was better than channelling the spirit of the Factory House, but neither as good as Avery.DRT wrote:Why not just wait for the next crappy Factory House Blend?
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
i'd be interested in trying at 5 cases
and depending on size
as most places require at least a barrel's worth of stuff before bottling (small barrel is about 20 cases) we would have to determine what the blend is
and depending on size
as most places require at least a barrel's worth of stuff before bottling (small barrel is about 20 cases) we would have to determine what the blend is
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
This is all delightful; but remember how many here have foresworn the buying of new port. Even the great alumni such as AHB claim not to need any more; and they feign not to want it either. And then there is the question of your life-coaching responsibilities towards young DRT. Who, I ask, is to drink these gallons of TPF 2014?
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
I hereby release my life-coach from his responsibilities to me in relation to this misadventure.djewesbury wrote:And then there is the question of your life-coaching responsibilities towards young DRT.
In the words of the Duncan Bannatyne: "I'm out!"
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
Ambiguous: do you mean that you are giving up your position at the feet of your spiritual guru, or that you think that TPF 14 is a mug's game and you wouldn't risk your knees for this mess of portage?DRT wrote:I hereby release my life-coach from his responsibilities to me in relation to this misadventure.djewesbury wrote:And then there is the question of your life-coaching responsibilities towards young DRT.
In the words of the Duncan Bannatyne: "I'm out!"
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
The latter. It is a seriously bad idea. Not even Baldrick could have come up with a less cunning plan than this one.djewesbury wrote:do you mean that you are giving up your position at the feet of your spiritual guru, or that you think that TPF 14 is a mug's game and you wouldn't risk your knees for this mess of portage?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
Do you not admire the audacity of John Avery in concocting a rough and ready "house" blend of three of the top producers' efforts from, what was at the time, one of the finest vintages in recent memory?DRT wrote: It is a seriously bad idea. Not even Baldrick could have come up with a less cunning plan than this one.
Rob C.
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
For this to work and be worthwhile, i think you would need to set up a port company and register with IVDP. That would presumably give you the ability to buy pipes of port from other producers (if - big if - they are willing to sell). Said company would be a "virtual" producer - no quinta / plant / lodge - though you could look to acquire a defunct brand if you wanted to push the boat out. You would then need to negotiate use of another producer's plant for mixing and bottling of the pipes. Since none of the "port" would be for sale, presumably you wouldn't need IVDP approval of the end product (albeit you couldn't then call it "Port" - simply "JDAW's Finest Reserve"), nor would you need to hold additional stock under the lei de terceiro for some time (and even then, you could buy a large quantity of low quality stuff to see you through).jdaw1 wrote:Attentive students of will already know that the 2014 harvest will be of excellent vintage quality.
Attentive students of will also know that 1963 Avery was a blend made by the wine merchant Avery’s, being one part Taylor to two parts Fonseca to three parts Sandeman.
Put these together.
Could we do our own 2014? Could we do a better 2014 blend? Buy a few dozen of the relevant components, mix, re-bottle, and apply our own labels? Of course the rotters at the IVDP (those who won’t let us buy the components in pipes) will have conniptions, which would be a small part of the pleasure. Would it be worthwhile? Are we confident that we can improve on the work of the professionals?
I don’t know — so far, these are questions.
It does not strike me that the advice of a friendly producer / experienced lawyer in Porto to scope this out would be too expensive or time-consuming....and perhaps THRA has already looked into it in relation to TPS.....
Rob C.
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
If we do it in Portugal, it will be destroyed by anti-business Portuguese bureaucracy.
So it has to be elsewhere. So the juice has to be exported in small glass containers, which have to be opened. But if we do that, the Portuguese can’t stop us selling it. If the label is honest — customer blend, ½ Dow ⅓ Quevedo ⅙ Vesuvio, first English bottled VP since the 1970 vintage — their legal arguments will have some difficulties.
So it has to be elsewhere. So the juice has to be exported in small glass containers, which have to be opened. But if we do that, the Portuguese can’t stop us selling it. If the label is honest — customer blend, ½ Dow ⅓ Quevedo ⅙ Vesuvio, first English bottled VP since the 1970 vintage — their legal arguments will have some difficulties.
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
Indeed I do. I admire the product of his many decades in the wines trade and his many, many years of experience in blending Port from bulk components and then bottling them. John Avery was a professional. We are mere amatuers.RAYC wrote:Do you not admire the audacity of John Avery in concocting a rough and ready "house" blend of three of the top producers' efforts from, what was at the time, one of the finest vintages in recent memory?DRT wrote: It is a seriously bad idea. Not even Baldrick could have come up with a less cunning plan than this one.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3515
- Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
- Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
DRT wrote:We are mere amatuers.
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
actually, i like the idea and may just persue this stateside myself.
now, just eagerly awaiting the 2014 vintages.
however, speculation on the blend now woudl be just. I find that i've been liking the recent taylor's on their own, same goes with the other houses mentioned. I do find lacking with some of the other 2nd-3rd tier quintas tho that I may try blending a lesser (see cheaper) brand with a few bottles of either Dow or Fonseca.
and after a year of dawdling, I'm also going to proceed and try my hand at tawnynizing some niepoort rubys and storing them in a 5 gallon barrel.
now, just eagerly awaiting the 2014 vintages.
however, speculation on the blend now woudl be just. I find that i've been liking the recent taylor's on their own, same goes with the other houses mentioned. I do find lacking with some of the other 2nd-3rd tier quintas tho that I may try blending a lesser (see cheaper) brand with a few bottles of either Dow or Fonseca.
and after a year of dawdling, I'm also going to proceed and try my hand at tawnynizing some niepoort rubys and storing them in a 5 gallon barrel.
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
-
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3515
- Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
- Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
I have no idea what we might produce... Might an alternative be to take a set of bottles from say 1999 and attempt a blend; this would have the advantage of potential immediate drinkability, but also longer term improvement, rather than 2014 requiring us to wait 15-20 years to see how we did? (I have no idea whether mixing post (partial) maturation is really a viable option).
Theoretically, could I take 3 different bottles of F70 from 3 different bottlers, mix them and then put my own label on as PhilW's F70...?
Theoretically, could I take 3 different bottles of F70 from 3 different bottlers, mix them and then put my own label on as PhilW's F70...?
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
i certainly woudlnt' risk the amount of air that would mix with the wine if you did do that with an older bottlePhilW wrote:I have no idea what we might produce... Might an alternative be to take a set of bottles from say 1999 and attempt a blend; this would have the advantage of potential immediate drinkability, but also longer term improvement, rather than 2014 requiring us to wait 15-20 years to see how we did? (I have no idea whether mixing post (partial) maturation is really a viable option).
Theoretically, could I take 3 different bottles of F70 from 3 different bottlers, mix them and then put my own label on as PhilW's F70...?
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: 2014: the TPF blend
Couldn't agree moreDRT wrote:... It is a seriously bad idea. ...