1991 Graham

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1991 Graham

Post by jdaw1 »

winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1991 Graham

Post by winesecretary »

Opened 1900, decanted 2100. Supremely aromatic. A remarkable amount- two full dessert-spoons- of what is not so much sediment as sludge. Appears to be on good form.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1991 Graham

Post by jdaw1 »

G91. Glorious red, 50% opaque. Full bodied and red fruited, slightly closed, some menthol and violets. I like the weight, but it's slightly closed as if needing more time in the cellar. Liked.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 1991 Graham

Post by DRT »

I bought a case of this more than a decade ago. It sounds like I drunk six of them by mistake.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1991 Graham

Post by winesecretary »

60% opaque, dark red wine. Dark fruits, juicily pleasant on the palate, with some prunes. Quite good.
User avatar
nac
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1836
Joined: 14:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: 1991 Graham

Post by nac »

Medium colour, with not much on the nose. Quite nice in the mouth - some fruit and soft tannin. OK.
Post Reply