Tasted on 30/07/20 as part of the Quevedo white port tasting hosted by Oscar Quevedo, the BFT and VWP.
Definitely darker than the previous reserves and 10YO maybe 25% opacity. The nose is more perfumed than the 10YO with a strong inclination for raisins and currents. If I was blind, probably would have said a tawny. In the mouth, its a smooth, sophisticated port with a hearty nuttiness to boot. It is however incredibly delicate and perhaps not as big as I would like. The food pairing suggested having some chocolate and nuts to have with it. I had this with chocolate which quickly overpowered the port (Rich believes otherwise, YMMV).
A solid 30YO white. 16/20.
NV Quevedo White 30YO (bottled 2020)
-
JacobH
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: NV Quevedo 30YO white
Notes: Average age: 38 to 40 years. Definitely brown in colour rather than amber. More similar to the reserve white than the 10-year-old on the nose: very reserved and with little fruit. In the mouth, the immediate hit is very austere and not to my tastes. It then opens up to lovely caramel with a very long aftertaste. But the austerity is problematic for me.
Tasted at: Quevedo Virtual White Port Tasting
Date: 30th July 2020
Rated*: P
http://www.jacob-head.com/port/records/ ... -Old-White
* A Note on Ratings
My rating system attempts to answer the question “is this a good Port?” one of three ways: N—No; P—Possibly; or C—Certainly. Ports generally are rated against others of their category. Therefore, a Ruby Port which I rate as C for Certainly good, might not be as good as a Vintage Port which receives the same rating. I sometimes modify my rating with a plus or minus indicating that the Port is better or worse than might be expected for this category.
Tasted at: Quevedo Virtual White Port Tasting
Date: 30th July 2020
Rated*: P
http://www.jacob-head.com/port/records/ ... -Old-White
* A Note on Ratings
My rating system attempts to answer the question “is this a good Port?” one of three ways: N—No; P—Possibly; or C—Certainly. Ports generally are rated against others of their category. Therefore, a Ruby Port which I rate as C for Certainly good, might not be as good as a Vintage Port which receives the same rating. I sometimes modify my rating with a plus or minus indicating that the Port is better or worse than might be expected for this category.
