Page 1 of 1

1924 Unknown

Posted: 21:30 Mon 13 Oct 2008
by jdaw1

Re: 1924 Unknown

Posted: 04:14 Tue 14 Oct 2008
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=13229#13229]Here[/url] jdaw1 wrote:For those interested in the provenance of the 1924:
Christies, London, 7th June 2007, lot 306 wrote:Believed Cockburn—Vintage 1924: Remains of embossed wax capsule. No label. Level into neck (1)
Image
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=17105#p17105]Here[/url] AHB wrote:Out of interest, here are a couple of pictures of the 1924 "Cockburn" that will be making an appearance on October 8. If anyone can help to identify these, please do.
Image
Image

Re: 1924 Unknown

Posted: 04:16 Tue 14 Oct 2008
by jdaw1
1924 Unknown, “Believed Cockburn†: darker than the others — visually a creature from a different stable. And the same true by smell, accurately described by the Lisles as “dessicated coconut†. Lots of fruit, but off. To taste I wrote only “off†. Not liked; not Cockburn.

Unbranded cork — of which currently I cannot find a photograph.

Re: 1924 Unknown

Posted: 16:35 Sat 25 Oct 2008
by DRT
My note reads "Too dark. Musty. Not nice. 'orrible."

Re: 1924 Unknown

Posted: 16:48 Sun 07 Dec 2008
by Alex Bridgeman
From the flavour profile, this was believed by Miguel Corte Real to be the Croft. A lovely fresh and floral nose with plenty of red fruits over a smokey tone. Strangely soapy in the mouth, with a pleasant flavour of soaked raisins. Good aftertaste, mouthfilling and lingering. Very pleasant. 86/100.

Re: 1924 Unknown

Posted: 03:16 Wed 07 Jan 2009
by jdaw1
Miguel Côrte-Real sent AHB some of his own notes on the various vintages, some obviously drafted in advance, some from the day itself.
Miguel Côrte-Real wrote:1924

Generic Information
A year of good quality and fair colour, a little on the green side and so a little lacking in body, but the wines developed fairly well in bottle and produced a very flavoury attractive wine. (J.Smithes 1968)

Year/Viticulture
A small yield.

MC-R notes
8/10