Page 1 of 1

2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 22:02 Tue 30 Dec 2008
by JacobH
This is available everywhere in the UK, frequently for not very much money. The 2000 and 2001 versions of this were all rated pretty highly (prompting much ‟why do they filter it?” discussions). I’m less convinced by this younger offering. It doesn’t have the same complexity or chocolaty undertones of 2001 and seems to be headed more in the Ruby Reserve direction than the VP. Perhaps the LBV suffered in terms of the better grapes being directed towards the VP? I think I am unlikely to pick up any more of this unless it becomes exceptionally cheap.

-Jacob

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 19:29 Fri 09 Jan 2009
by morteno
I think this is the most boring LBV I've ever had. Too sweet, bland blend of fruit taste, too pleasing (but doesn't succeed), no structure etc. And it's not even among the cheaper ones. If I had more in my 'cellar' I would use it to make glögg. I bet the 6 grapes, which I haven't tried yet, is better. And they cost the same.

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 22:01 Fri 09 Jan 2009
by Glenn E.
If the rumors - which I have only heard, never read - are to be believed, Graham's Six Grapes contains their second best grapes after their VP. So it wouldn't surprise me a bit if their LBV weren't stellar in comparison.

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 23:10 Fri 09 Jan 2009
by DRT
Glenn E. wrote:If the rumors - which I have only heard, never read - are to be believed, Graham's Six Grapes contains their second best grapes after their VP. So it wouldn't surprise me a bit if their LBV weren't stellar in comparison.
I was told this by a tour guide on a private tour of the Graham's lodge in VNG.

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 18:49 Sat 10 Jan 2009
by KillerB
Yes, but using only six grapes to make an entire bottle - it's not going to be very strong is it? :?

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 19:57 Sat 10 Jan 2009
by Glenn E.
They're very big grapes.

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 22:44 Sat 10 Jan 2009
by JacobH
Glenn E. wrote:They're very big grapes.
http://flickr.com/photos/lorismaria/5723493/
http://flickr.com/photos/lorismaria/5723493/
5723493_87b3508038.jpg (52.32 KiB) Viewed 7238 times

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 12:02 Sun 11 Jan 2009
by RonnieRoots
I've never been wowed by the Graham's LBV. I never understood its place between Six Grapes (decent ruby reserve) and Crusted (good glass of port and could easily replace the LBV).

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 20:07 Sun 11 Jan 2009
by Michael M.
RonnieRoots wrote:I've never been wowed by the Graham's LBV. I never understood its place between Six Grapes (decent ruby reserve) and Crusted (good glass of port and could easily replace the LBV).
I can second Morton and Ronald. Graham's LBV is not one I would look for again. I found it to be boring too. On the other side I found the Crusted Port well worth to seek out and I also would say, it would be worth to cellar some years. More like a VP than many others LBVs. I do like the "Six Grapes", but here in D for 20-25 EUR not very appealing. In NL for 15 EUR surely worth a try.

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 21:28 Sun 11 Jan 2009
by JacobH
Michael M. wrote:
RonnieRoots wrote:I've never been wowed by the Graham's LBV. I never understood its place between Six Grapes (decent ruby reserve) and Crusted (good glass of port and could easily replace the LBV).
I can second Morton and Ronald. Graham's LBV is not one I would look for again. I found it to be boring too. On the other side I found the Crusted Port well worth to seek out and I also would say, it would be worth to cellar some years. More like a VP than many others LBVs. I do like the "Six Grapes", but here in D for 20-25 EUR not very appealing. In NL for 15 EUR surely worth a try.
Hmm!I’m not sure I would write off all of their LBVs. I thought the 2001 was pretty solid in June and Alex has confessed to mistaking the 2000 as a VP. I’ll certainly try the 2004 when it’s released.

Incidentally, if those are the prices you are paying for Port, you should start importing from the UK, especially with the GBP/EUR rate being what it is!

Re: 2003 Graham LBV

Posted: 00:20 Mon 12 Jan 2009
by KillerB
This thread made me check the bottles at Morrison's to see what the vintage was. It was 2003 so I left it. I wouldn't have even bothered normally and I probably wouldn't have bought even if it was 2000 but now you've got me OCDing like the rest of you. Thanks.