Page 1 of 1
1963 Graham
Posted: 14:56 Fri 13 Feb 2009
by SushiNorth
Tasted at a vertical of drinkable Graham's Vintage Ports from the past 50 years, held on the ever auspicious Friday the Thirteenth (February 2009) and hosted graciously by jfacciol.
Links:
Review;
1960;
1963;
1966;
1970;
1977;
1980;
1983;
1985;
1991;
1994;
Planning
Re: 1963 Graham
Posted: 14:04 Sat 14 Feb 2009
by jdaw1
Graham’s 1963: red, brown at edge, 30% opacity. Nose neither faint nor heavy, with lots of sweet cranberry. To taste good texture and length, very sweet, and lots of red fruit. John rightly said ‟orange peel”. Moses, rightly, thought good acidity. Some vegetable notes. Others but not I found ‟cigar box”. Some, including Moses and Anthony thought it tainted with TCA; others disagreed. Elys thought it nosed of star fruit and a swimming pool.
A controversial wine. My WOTN, and I was not alone. But hated by Moses and Anthony.
Re: 1963 Graham
Posted: 16:55 Mon 16 Feb 2009
by g-man
Spicy red berries, citrusy orange, that has a burnt match stick smell.
Allspice on the attack, rich full bodied smooth dark chocolate covered red fruits.
There's a slight celery / grassy finish that distracted a little.
I thought this was a very good port.
92.
Re: 1963 Graham
Posted: 16:56 Sat 21 Feb 2009
by SushiNorth
+9 Nice ruby color with a little brick tinge and very clear. The nose is complex and bright with anise, but a hint of chlorine (elyse). In the nose it is "harshy" with a toasted wood flavor -- more like a cedar than an oak -- and strawberries. It has a medium tail that fades rapidly. There's a lot of life left in the bottle. 91.
Re: 1963 Graham
Posted: 06:10 Tue 24 Feb 2009
by JohninNYC
In the aroma and taste, I got some white chocolate, orange peel, raspberry, walnuts, and some cigar box on the nose.
Re: 1963 Graham
Posted: 14:04 Tue 24 Feb 2009
by mosesbotbol
TCA was too overwhelming for me. For sure, I could taste what was behind that, but I wouldn't even score this bottle.