1960 Cockburn
1960 Cockburn
Links:
Re: 1960 Cockburn
C60: Nose had a slight woodiness, and a slight bottle stink. Taste matched.
Later the nose had resolved into overwhelming VA. I wrote ‟Horrible”.
Later the nose had resolved into overwhelming VA. I wrote ‟Horrible”.
- Chris Doty
- Graham’s Malvedos 1996
- Posts: 843
- Joined: 12:30 Fri 29 Jan 2010
Re: 1960 Cockburn
Crap.
(Flawed)
(Flawed)
- Alex Bridgeman
- Graham’s 1948
- Posts: 14903
- Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: 1960 Cockburn
Pale colour, light centre and a pale rim. Smelly on the nose, lots of rubber bands. Sweet entry, full of sugary rhubarb. Light bodied and elegant; quite simple and straightforward. Minimal aftertatse, but a light finish based on sweet sugar-syrup that lingers quite a long time. NR.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
Re: 1960 Cockburn
A little stinky/VA - nail varnish taste - not good.
No one above seemed to disagree.
No one above seemed to disagree.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn