ThePortForum.com

Links:

• Review of evening as a whole;
• 1970 Martinez;
• 1980 Graham;
• 1982 Croft;
• 1990 Warre Cavadinha;
• 1991 Fonseca Guimaraens;
• 1991 Quinta do Noval;
• 1991 Quinta de Roriz;
• 1991 Smith Woodhouse;
• 2003 Colmaça;
• 2003 Vale Dona Maria;
• 2005 Osborne LBV;
• NV Dow’s Icon Reserve;
• Planning and arrangements;
• Placemats.

Appearing to be in the early stages of maturity, 80% opaque. Some sweet whitecurrants on the nose. Dry entry with some dry fruit showing over a woody core and some sweet, dry tannins. Light bodied on the palate. A lovely perfumed finish with just a slight hint of VA on the very decent raspberry finish. An enjoyable but lightweight port that was guessed to be Quinta de Corte 1990. Not a good bottle. 84/100.

From Malvedos blog (comments to This Time It Wasn’t About the Port):

JDAW wrote:The glasses were tested with one mature port from a light-ish vintage (G80),

Cynthia wrote:Hello Julian! Spoke with Charles and showed him this comment. He disagrees with your assessment of the 1980 ”“ he feels it is certainly NOT a lightweight, but actually a fantastic wine, better than the 77 and every bit as good as the 1970; a different profile, but similar weight.

Compare to:

AHB wrote:An enjoyable but lightweight port

G80: are ex-cellars different to UK-matured?

Clear red, Very muted, Good sweetness in mouth, though extremely watery. A bit like drinking Evian, but still nice. Some discussion as to whether flawed.

jdaw1 wrote:Compare to:

AHB wrote:An enjoyable but lightweight port

G80: are ex-cellars different to UK-matured?

You are slightly taking me out of context. The sentence immediately following the one you quote reads

AHB wrote:Not a good bottle.

I have had much better bottles of Graham 1980 than the one at this tasting.