Wednesday October 8, 2008
- Alex Bridgeman
- Graham’s 1948
- Posts: 14908
- Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Experience indicates that because people like to taste at different paces, it is better to place all wines for the session on the tasting mats and then to allow people to taste their wines as they wish.
Similar to the way in which Linden organised the Noval / Nacional tasting.
Similar to the way in which Linden organised the Noval / Nacional tasting.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
I do notice that several people listed as coming have not confirmed bottles yet. Is that the case or cash contributions or something else? If so we need to figure that out ASAP.
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Some, including me, have sent £££ to DRT. He will ensure that things are fair — though I know not the details.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
I was just looking over the original #1 post and there was a number of names with blanks after them. Just wanted to get everything rapped as we are getting close and now is the time to make sure all is finalized.jdaw1 wrote:Some, including me, have sent £££ to DRT. He will ensure that things are fair — though I know not the details.
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
On the subject of the alleged 1895.
Simon: please post, or email me, pictures of that which has caused you to believe your bottle to be 1895. People will be interested.
No mention there of the 1895.George Saintsbury, in Notes on a Cellar Book, wrote:… to see the ’90’s catching up and beating the (as it seemed to me) always over-rated ’87’s : or to pit against each other two such vintages as ’96 and ’97 from the same shippers—these were intellectual as well as merely sensuous exercises, and pleasing as both.
From his lists Saintsbury never owned a ’95 from any shipper, whether or not Cockburn. Of course, absence of evidence is not incontrovertible evidence of absence, but is nonetheless suggestive.George Saintsbury, a few pages later, wrote:I subjoin a list of the ports in my cellar at different or the same times. …
Cockburn
1851
—81
—84
—90
—96
1900
…
Simon: please post, or email me, pictures of that which has caused you to believe your bottle to be 1895. People will be interested.
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
All cash contributions are now in and we are making a final attempt at sourcing a small number of older vintages. I believe we already have every known vintage from 1955 onwards. Any money that we cannot spend on additional bottles (because we can't find them) will be used to pay for the food, glass hire etc on the day.Andy V wrote:I was just looking over the original #1 post and there was a number of names with blanks after them. Just wanted to get everything rapped as we are getting close and now is the time to make sure all is finalized.jdaw1 wrote:Some, including me, have sent £££ to DRT. He will ensure that things are fair — though I know not the details.
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
This seems to confirm that ADVs 1924 is not a Cockburn.[url=http://www.theportforum.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=10]JDAW[/url] tells us [url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1993]here[/url] that [b]Vintagewise[/b] [b][i]A Postscript to Saintsbury’s[/i] Notes On A Cellar Book[/b] by [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Simon_(wine_critic)]André L. Simon[/url] [color=#666666][url=http://www.iwfs.com/secretariat/working_with_andre.htm]picture with the young Hugh Johnson[/url][/color], published by Michael Joseph Ltd of 26 Bloomsbury Street, London W.C.1 [color=#666666][now part of [url=http://www.penguin.com/]Penguin[/url]][/color] First published October 1945 … Fifth (Revised) Impression 1950 wrote:
The only wine of outstanding vintage character and merit of this decade was that of 1927, and, incidentally, was the only vintage offered during those ten years by Messrs. Cockburn
...but, as agreed earlier in this thread, we will just drink it anyway
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Cockburn also didn’t declare 1977, but that won’t stop us drinking one. Some wondered whether 1924 was similar.
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Quite possibly. But could also be a bottle of something unknown bottled by the wine merchant Cockburn's of Leith in Edinburgh, as could the 1895. Credit is given to AHB for this theory
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
We shall find out in due time...we need some Tongs to take off the head and retreive the cork in one undamaged piece to try and find out what the branding says
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Is the 1924 not Cockburn as well the 1895? Is the lineup still the same?..and what was the story on the 1977?
Here's a picture of the 1908 I'm bringing:
Here's a picture of the 1908 I'm bringing:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Translation: Sean hasn’t been following this thread, and, rather than read it himself, wants a summary. (Go on: tell me I’m wrong.)SEAN C. wrote:Is the 1924 not Cockburn as well the 1895? Is the lineup still the same?..and what was the story on the 1977?
Cockburn did not declare 1977. There was a ‘family bottling’, obviously of many fewer pipes. We have a bottle, from Cockburn themselves, of the 1977. Hurray!
1924 came from Christies, London, 7th June 2007, lot 306 (you’ve also tasted a Croft 1927 from the same lot).
Christies, London, 7th June 2007, lot 306 wrote:Believed Cockburn—Vintage 1924: Remains of embossed wax capsule. No label. Level into neck (1)
Could be a family-bottling Cockburn 1924. But it also could be something else.[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=17105#p17105]Here[/url] AHB wrote:Out of interest, here are a couple of pictures of the 1924 "Cockburn" that will be making an appearance on October 8. If anyone can help to identify these, please do.
The 189?: Simon Lisle has been asked a few times for a picture, but he also isn’t following the thread. I don’t know how best to nudge him into action.
- Axel P
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
- Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
... there might be a 1947 inbound. Will let you know if it is confirmed...
Axel
Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
o-port-unidade.com
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
You my friend are 100% correct!jdaw1 wrote:Translation: Sean hasn’t been following this thread, and, rather than read it himself, wants a summary. (Go on: tell me I’m wrong.)SEAN C. wrote:Is the 1924 not Cockburn as well the 1895? Is the lineup still the same?..and what was the story on the 1977?
Thanks for the summary!! Are you going Julian?
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
1. Pay attention! Being asleep has cost you a place at this coming weekend’s excellent tasting; don’t repeat the error.SEAN C. wrote:You my friend are 100% correct!jdaw1 wrote:Translation: Sean hasn’t been following this thread, and, rather than read it himself, wants a summary. (Go on: tell me I’m wrong.)
Thanks for the summary!! Are you going Julian?
2. Yes, a month or so ago my travel plans changed, facilitating my presence at the Cockburn.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Very cool Axel.Axel P wrote:... there might be a 1947 inbound. Will let you know if it is confirmed...
Axel
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
I should be collecting the 198? from Simon this weekend and a picture will follow shortly thereafter.jdaw1 wrote: The 189?: Simon Lisle has been asked a few times for a picture, but he also isn’t following the thread. I don’t know how best to nudge him into action.
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Oh dear. We’ve been swindled.DRT wrote:I should be collecting the 198? from Simon this weekend and a picture will follow shortly thereafter.
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
That is impressive. The longest time I've ever spent at the porcelain temple continuously was 2 hours (without passing out). But with all that port, I guess it's only natural =)jdaw1 wrote:According to my records:
We need to agree start times. Perhaps 14:30 punctual and 19:00 punctual?
Alex, make sure you're sober enough to get on a plane to NY.
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Pictures of the 1895? as promised:
The only identifying mark n the bottle is the hand-written label tied to the neck, which has a question mark on it. The small round label on the bottle is completely illegible. After taking this picture I cleaned the neck of the bottle to see whether or not the cork is branded. The bottom half that I could see below the wax capsule looks completely black and sodden so we will have to wait until it is opened.
Derek
The only identifying mark n the bottle is the hand-written label tied to the neck, which has a question mark on it. The small round label on the bottle is completely illegible. After taking this picture I cleaned the neck of the bottle to see whether or not the cork is branded. The bottom half that I could see below the wax capsule looks completely black and sodden so we will have to wait until it is opened.
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
Wow. So maybe Cockburn, maybe some year within a percentage point or few of 1895. We’ll find out on the night, perhaps.
- Alex Bridgeman
- Graham’s 1948
- Posts: 14908
- Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
I'm confident of making it. Despite further drinking on Oct 9, I am fully expecting to be able to get on a plane for NY via Stockholm on Sunday the following week!g-man wrote:Alex, make sure you're sober enough to get on a plane to NY.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
He all,
Since many of us leave for Portugal in less than a week, just want to make sure all is wrapped up.
1-What time is the offical start time? (round one and two)
2- Who's bringing decanters so we can decant the wines (for those not decanted ahead of time).
3- Cloth filter for decanting. I can bring cloth filters for the decanting if we don't already have that taken care of.
4- Seems Covenant Garden is a large place, for those not familiar is there a floor or section that the Crusting Pipe is in, or is it quite easy to locate even for us Yanks
5-whatever else I forgot to ask.
Since many of us leave for Portugal in less than a week, just want to make sure all is wrapped up.
1-What time is the offical start time? (round one and two)
2- Who's bringing decanters so we can decant the wines (for those not decanted ahead of time).
3- Cloth filter for decanting. I can bring cloth filters for the decanting if we don't already have that taken care of.
4- Seems Covenant Garden is a large place, for those not familiar is there a floor or section that the Crusting Pipe is in, or is it quite easy to locate even for us Yanks
5-whatever else I forgot to ask.
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
?Andy V wrote:He all,
Andy V wrote:1-What time is the offical start time? (round one and two)
jdaw1 wrote:14:30 punctual and 19:00 punctual
The decanting committee (DRT+AHB+JDAW) will be double-decanting, so we won’t need decanters.Andy V wrote:2- Who's bringing decanters so we can decant the wines (for those not decanted ahead of time).
Coffee filter is usual. (See previous decanting experiment.)Andy V wrote:3- Cloth filter for decanting. I can bring cloth filters for the decanting if we don't already have that taken care of.
One storey below ground level, near the centre of the Covent Garden market. Several tube stops are within easy reach, including Covent Garden on the Piccadilly line, or, only a little further and on the District line, Charing Cross or Temple.Andy V wrote:4- Seems Covenant Garden is a large place, for those not familiar is there a floor or section that the Crusting Pipe is in, or is it quite easy to locate even for us Yanks
Look. Observe hue and translucency, and, if possible, texture. Smell carefully. Swirl. Repeat smelling. Take a small sip, and taste and smell. Re-smell. Take a larger sip, noting carefully the olfactory and textural sensations throughout the mouth and throat. Locate pen. Record sensations.Andy V wrote:5-whatever else I forgot to ask.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday October 8, 2008
ok thanks
negative ghost rider, i will be chugging out of the bottleLook. Observe hue and translucency, and, if possible, texture. Smell carefully. Swirl. Repeat smelling. Take a small sip, and taste and smell. Re-smell. Take a larger sip, noting carefully the olfactory and textural sensations throughout the mouth and throat. Locate pen. Record sensations.