The Port Forum Offline #2 - 1st Sep 2007
Fonseca tasting placemats
[Edited in error]: Fonseca tasting placemats, and, for absolutely no good reason at all, a psychedelic version.
Last edited by jdaw1 on 23:07 Sun 19 Aug 2007, edited 3 times in total.
- Alex Bridgeman
- Graham’s 1948
- Posts: 14906
- Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
I will be with you - but only in spirit.
I've got so may travel commitments between now and the end of September (including some rugby watching visits to the continent) that I will absolutely not be able to make it to St Helens for TPF Offline #2.
I hope you enjoy yourselves and have a fantastic time enjoying what should be some amazing ports, even the lesser ones
Alex
I've got so may travel commitments between now and the end of September (including some rugby watching visits to the continent) that I will absolutely not be able to make it to St Helens for TPF Offline #2.
I hope you enjoy yourselves and have a fantastic time enjoying what should be some amazing ports, even the lesser ones
Alex
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
This offline also mentioned on FTLOP
This offline also mentioned here.
-
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
- Contact:
I must say, i tried really hard to get some days off work to make this. I figured it would be a fun surprise to show up with some bottles. I really do want to meet you guys in person and have some fun. But work had other ideas since I am already taking time off work in October. Have no fear, plan "B" is in the works to try and stop off on the back to the states.
Straight in
Aha,
So that wicked man, JDAW, in whose illustrious company several tens of VPs have met a happy death, informed me that some poor unfortunates in St Helens had got themselves into a terrible fix, and faced an evening of more VP than they could possibly manage. I hasten to add that this is not to impute them as amateur drinkers. Oh, no. But VP is a beautiful thing, and 15 bottles between four and three-possible people is going to be wasteful. Even if you drunk the lot, I troth it wouldn’t stay drunk. (this emoticon is called 'oops', but he's looking queasy to me).
Now, my professional line of business is saving the world. It’s a big job, I know that to be true, but someone has to do it. Luckily, there are a few of us at it, so I tend to concentrate on waste management. I get quite wound up by endless media campaigns grumbling about excess packaging; it is a problem, but a much bigger issue is wastefulness. They say that one third of the food we British buy is thrown away untouched, and that is criminal.
[Getting to point soon] So hearing about you chaps trying to shovel 15 bottles of port down four and three-possible necks makes me cross, because I know there will be leftovers. It might be the Fonseca 83 that gets left behind â€‟ I noted its (relative) ranking as low-end â€‟ but there are good folk (I like to include myself among ‘em) who would sit very happily in a corner all evening sipping F83 with a contented look on their faces. AND they’d do the washing up afterwards.
All this leads me to wonder whether I might be able to join the great event (subject to permission from the missus, who may well be keen to come along herself, presenting the issue of dealing with the issue - Isabelle, 18 months old), and do my utmost to help reduce the leftovers. For the good of the planet, you understand. Earlier discussions suggest that attendees might bring along a bottle themselves by way of entrance fee. I could certainly do this (supposing I can find a missing vintage), but I respectfully suggest that increasing both attendees and the port lake will not reduce wastage. Could we come to some other arrangement?
It might all fall through and not work and be rotten, but this is rather exciting. I hope we can make it work.
Ghandhi
So that wicked man, JDAW, in whose illustrious company several tens of VPs have met a happy death, informed me that some poor unfortunates in St Helens had got themselves into a terrible fix, and faced an evening of more VP than they could possibly manage. I hasten to add that this is not to impute them as amateur drinkers. Oh, no. But VP is a beautiful thing, and 15 bottles between four and three-possible people is going to be wasteful. Even if you drunk the lot, I troth it wouldn’t stay drunk. (this emoticon is called 'oops', but he's looking queasy to me).
Now, my professional line of business is saving the world. It’s a big job, I know that to be true, but someone has to do it. Luckily, there are a few of us at it, so I tend to concentrate on waste management. I get quite wound up by endless media campaigns grumbling about excess packaging; it is a problem, but a much bigger issue is wastefulness. They say that one third of the food we British buy is thrown away untouched, and that is criminal.
[Getting to point soon] So hearing about you chaps trying to shovel 15 bottles of port down four and three-possible necks makes me cross, because I know there will be leftovers. It might be the Fonseca 83 that gets left behind â€‟ I noted its (relative) ranking as low-end â€‟ but there are good folk (I like to include myself among ‘em) who would sit very happily in a corner all evening sipping F83 with a contented look on their faces. AND they’d do the washing up afterwards.
All this leads me to wonder whether I might be able to join the great event (subject to permission from the missus, who may well be keen to come along herself, presenting the issue of dealing with the issue - Isabelle, 18 months old), and do my utmost to help reduce the leftovers. For the good of the planet, you understand. Earlier discussions suggest that attendees might bring along a bottle themselves by way of entrance fee. I could certainly do this (supposing I can find a missing vintage), but I respectfully suggest that increasing both attendees and the port lake will not reduce wastage. Could we come to some other arrangement?
It might all fall through and not work and be rotten, but this is rather exciting. I hope we can make it work.
Ghandhi
Hope it all comes together. Jdaw1 speaks highly of you, but we'll still try to give you a chance!
You know you'll becoming to the Barren Wastelands of the North (Eh? AHB?). Now although I think we're quite cultured up here, I suspect if you use that mode of transport and dress, thats in your Avatar, we may be turning our event into some form of Memorial!
Its nothing personal, the REAL Gandhi would have struggled with his No Violence policy on a Friday night in Liverpool City Centre!
Alan
You know you'll becoming to the Barren Wastelands of the North (Eh? AHB?). Now although I think we're quite cultured up here, I suspect if you use that mode of transport and dress, thats in your Avatar, we may be turning our event into some form of Memorial!
Its nothing personal, the REAL Gandhi would have struggled with his No Violence policy on a Friday night in Liverpool City Centre!
Alan
Simon is the right-most man in this picture
For what little it’s worth, Simon is the right-most man in this picture, which appears in this post.
Collecting F60 so that m≠n
Ghahhnhhhdhhhhihhhhh: if you’ll be passing anywhere near Gatwick betwixt now and 1st September, I could set you the task of collecting a bottle of F60 from my father’s. Just so that we’d have 16 bottles: it’s so much better to have a number that is both n^m and m^n, for integer m and n with m≠n.
Also, FYI,
Also, FYI,
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=530#530]Here[/url] our illustrious soon-to-be host, Conky, wrote:If ever you fancy roughing it, we'll save you a chair at one of ours. If you can keep a secret, there's not ONE decent Tasting Note surfaced from them. Strange that. Dereks even brought his Leather bound TN's Book, and then just shamefully shook his head when he's tried to read it the following morning.
I have a client down in Sussex (Jim Beam, no less), so I might well be able to orchestrate a visit. I'll let you know if it looks like it might work.
I wonder if the evidence so far presented suggests that I might have the most organised tasting notes, given that I'm writing them down in a Black and Red book? It means they're all together, even though the comments get less revealing later on [eg I wrote "T27 hmmm". Thank-you, Ghandih, very helpful.]
I just spend 20 minutes adding my tasting notes on 1985 Martinez, which I thought might interest people. You won't find it on the website, though. I was using Dragon Naturally Speaking software to dictate the notes and many paragraphs in it just closed the window. All lost. Pants. Going to sulk now.
I wonder if the evidence so far presented suggests that I might have the most organised tasting notes, given that I'm writing them down in a Black and Red book? It means they're all together, even though the comments get less revealing later on [eg I wrote "T27 hmmm". Thank-you, Ghandih, very helpful.]
I just spend 20 minutes adding my tasting notes on 1985 Martinez, which I thought might interest people. You won't find it on the website, though. I was using Dragon Naturally Speaking software to dictate the notes and many paragraphs in it just closed the window. All lost. Pants. Going to sulk now.
Ghandih,
Martinez 85? Wow. For sentimental reasons as well as taste. Thats my favourite Port. If you thought it was dire, I need a dark room and some pills to get over it. The bottle I had was actually Harveys 85, but that was just the American name for Martinez. See Here for a few verdicts.
If you can remember anything about it, I'd be quite curious. A full tasting note would have been fascinating, but such is life.
Alan[/url]
Martinez 85? Wow. For sentimental reasons as well as taste. Thats my favourite Port. If you thought it was dire, I need a dark room and some pills to get over it. The bottle I had was actually Harveys 85, but that was just the American name for Martinez. See Here for a few verdicts.
If you can remember anything about it, I'd be quite curious. A full tasting note would have been fascinating, but such is life.
Alan[/url]
M85, but off-topic
Feel free to add the M85 note here, noting carefully the correct title format of “1985 Martinez†. You had ten bottles as I recall, I taking two from that case.
Note: this post off-topic. Simon will be starting a new thread in which further posts on the subject can be made.
Note: this post off-topic. Simon will be starting a new thread in which further posts on the subject can be made.
Back to the point
I feel I led us all a bit astray there, sorry about that. Silly computer.
I had hoped the venue might be the less well known St Helens in, err, Cornwall, or something like that, but I'm sure I'll probably be OK. I went to Liverpool once and got home again in one bit, and I've been to Manchester lots of times. Am I allowed to suggest that the two are similar in some way, or is that just classic Southerner ignorance? I'm from Hampshire by birth, and would be willing to say that Portsmouth and Southampton are fairly similar (to folk who don't class themselves as supporters of either team).
The tasting now seems to coincide with an event at the wife's hockey club, but she said there'd be no reason why she couldn't take the littl'un along with her. All in all, that counts as quite a large fraction of the Red Sea moving to one side to allow the (potentially) chosen one to the Promised Land. How exciting!
Any other obvious hurdles?
I had hoped the venue might be the less well known St Helens in, err, Cornwall, or something like that, but I'm sure I'll probably be OK. I went to Liverpool once and got home again in one bit, and I've been to Manchester lots of times. Am I allowed to suggest that the two are similar in some way, or is that just classic Southerner ignorance? I'm from Hampshire by birth, and would be willing to say that Portsmouth and Southampton are fairly similar (to folk who don't class themselves as supporters of either team).
The tasting now seems to coincide with an event at the wife's hockey club, but she said there'd be no reason why she couldn't take the littl'un along with her. All in all, that counts as quite a large fraction of the Red Sea moving to one side to allow the (potentially) chosen one to the Promised Land. How exciting!
Any other obvious hurdles?
Re: Straight in
Ghandhi,Ghandih wrote:Earlier discussions suggest that attendees might bring along a bottle themselves by way of entrance fee. I could certainly do this (supposing I can find a missing vintage), but I respectfully suggest that increasing both attendees and the port lake will not reduce wastage. Could we come to some other arrangement?
I'm not sure we have enough mouths to contemplate adding further bottles to the line-up as yet, even though it may throw jdaw's formula into some kind of turmoil.
The plan so far has been that we will add up the total cost of the bottles in the line-up and then work out an even contribution from each participant. Those who have supplied the wines will have the cost offset against their contribution with any excess being refunded from the cash contributions of the others.
To ease your planet-saving consience I can confirm that there will be absolutely no waste other than the butts of Conky's cigars
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: Straight in
That’s tickety-boo with me.Derek T. wrote:The plan so far has been that we will add up the total cost of the bottles in the line-up and then work out an even contribution from each participant. Those who have supplied the wines will have the cost offset against their contribution with any excess being refunded from the cash contributions of the others.
That seems about as fair as it could possibly be. My concern is that there is such a splendid line up of quality ports, I won't be able to stomp up my share. It all seems a bit vulgar talking about money, but could someone find a fag packet with no writing on the back and do a quick estimation of the total cost of the currently offered ports? This will then enable me to guess at what level of attendees I could join the party (if not already unceremoniously dropped for being so impertinent).
Ghandhhi
PS Like the way you chaps are getting the hang of the aitches. Well done.
Ghandhhi
PS Like the way you chaps are getting the hang of the aitches. Well done.
Ghhhanhhdhhhhihhhh,
I have a very accurate fag packet that tells me that the cost of the 12 Fonseca vintage listed above is £997, providing they are sourced from Alan, Tom and I as we have already agreed prices privately that beat anything you will buy in a wine merchant.
The cost per person depends on the number of persons. I would say that 6 to 8 people could attend comfortably at 1.5 bottles of Fonseca each. If experience is anything to go buy there would be a few wildcard bottles thrown in for fun to see off the hard core at the end of the night.
If we have 6 people (Alan, Tom, KillerB, jdaw, yourself and I) that works out at £166.17 per person.
The biggest question remaining at this point in time is - "Tom, are you ready to commit to coming along?" - If the answer is "No", I fear we need a new theme
Derek
I have a very accurate fag packet that tells me that the cost of the 12 Fonseca vintage listed above is £997, providing they are sourced from Alan, Tom and I as we have already agreed prices privately that beat anything you will buy in a wine merchant.
The cost per person depends on the number of persons. I would say that 6 to 8 people could attend comfortably at 1.5 bottles of Fonseca each. If experience is anything to go buy there would be a few wildcard bottles thrown in for fun to see off the hard core at the end of the night.
If we have 6 people (Alan, Tom, KillerB, jdaw, yourself and I) that works out at £166.17 per person.
The biggest question remaining at this point in time is - "Tom, are you ready to commit to coming along?" - If the answer is "No", I fear we need a new theme
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Taking it to the limit
Derek,
Many thanks for the sums. 12 bottles and six people will be tough, and I thought there were 15 bottles at a previous count (not that I'm being greedy - I'm not sure I can manage two myself, but I'm brave enough to try).
Anyway, my notional top whack was £150. You're telling me £167, and I'm probably not going to bail for the sake of £17, but I'd rather not be pushed any higher!
I conclude from this that Tom must come along (agreed?). Beyond that, though, do we need still more folk? Should the nets be thrown out on the other side of the boat, to see what we might drag up?
Cheers,
Ganhdi
Many thanks for the sums. 12 bottles and six people will be tough, and I thought there were 15 bottles at a previous count (not that I'm being greedy - I'm not sure I can manage two myself, but I'm brave enough to try).
Anyway, my notional top whack was £150. You're telling me £167, and I'm probably not going to bail for the sake of £17, but I'd rather not be pushed any higher!
I conclude from this that Tom must come along (agreed?). Beyond that, though, do we need still more folk? Should the nets be thrown out on the other side of the boat, to see what we might drag up?
Cheers,
Ganhdi
Re: Taking it to the limit
Where do you think you came from?Ghandih wrote:Should the nets be thrown out on the other side of the boat, to see what we might drag up?
The £997 covers the 12 Fonseca Vintages, assuming Tom is still coming and happy to supply most of the bottles
Bottles 13 to 15 are Fonseca Guimaraens bottlings from lesser years. Not essential and, to be honest, probably not a good choice in the company of their generally more gifted siblings.
Keeping it simple - we need Tom's participation to put the Fonseca vertical together and more people are still welcome to join in.
Can we please have a show of hands (posts) from those who are still committed to attending. Anyone who is not committing because of the planned line-up and/or cost please shout (by PM if preferred) and things can change. The most important aspect of the evening is to ensure we have 6+ nutters in one place drinking Vintage Port
In jdaw's absence I will raise hands for he and I. I think it's also safe to assume Conky will join in as jdaw and I will be drinking this stuff on his patio. So we have 3 confirmed. More confirmations, please?
Derek
Bottles 13 to 15 are Fonseca Guimaraens bottlings from lesser years. Not essential and, to be honest, probably not a good choice in the company of their generally more gifted siblings.
Keeping it simple - we need Tom's participation to put the Fonseca vertical together and more people are still welcome to join in.
Can we please have a show of hands (posts) from those who are still committed to attending. Anyone who is not committing because of the planned line-up and/or cost please shout (by PM if preferred) and things can change. The most important aspect of the evening is to ensure we have 6+ nutters in one place drinking Vintage Port
In jdaw's absence I will raise hands for he and I. I think it's also safe to assume Conky will join in as jdaw and I will be drinking this stuff on his patio. So we have 3 confirmed. More confirmations, please?
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
The lineup looks great, the people fantastic, but I think I will need to miss this one due to work. Please toast me (and with the 27, not the 2000!) and enjoy what looks likely to be a night to remember!Derek T. wrote:I think now that jdaw has gone to the trouble of booking flights it would be good if others would confirm attendance so that we can make some firm plans for wine, glasses and beds.
I think the current list is as follows:Please confirm or update your status ASAP. Anyone not on the list remains more than welcome to join us.
- Corky - definitely
- jdaw - definitely
- KillerB - definitely
- Uncle Tom - definitely maybe
- Jay P. - maybe
- AHB - probably not but maybe
- The Roots - would rather be drinking German beer
Derek
Jay
Better things for better living through chemistry