RAYC wrote:Are people booking the same hotel as last year?
I do not know which hotel is being booked but I do know that I shall be FIRST into the taxi this year!!!
RAYC wrote:Are people booking the same hotel as last year?
Axel P wrote:I would like to rephrase the very often used sentence into: We leave no-one behind, except ex-RAF-policemen, who should know their way around anyways...![]()
Axel
AHB wrote:I've just updated the list of the attendees on the first post - my guest (who is not from the industry, but is a fellow port lover and consumer who happens to live close to the Bell) has confirmed that he is free on the 15th.
To try and make the arrangements for the Xmas Offline as smooth as possible, please would people:
(a) confirm that if they are on the list as attending, then they still intend to attend
(b) if they are on the list as attending and still intend to attend, whether they wish a taxi to collect them from the Bell and where they would like the taxi to take them
(c) whether they are attending or on the reserve list, if they would like a fillet steak and chips dinner, or something else
Thanks.
AHB wrote:(c) whether they are attending or on the reserve list, if they would like a fillet steak and chips dinner, or something else.
AHB wrote:To try and make the arrangements for the Xmas Offline as smooth as possible, please would people:
(a) confirm that if they are on the list as attending, then they still intend to attend
(b) if they are on the list as attending and still intend to attend, whether they wish a taxi to collect them from the Bell and where they would like the taxi to take them
(c) whether they are attending or on the reserve list, if they would like a fillet steak and chips dinner, or something else
jdaw1 wrote:First draft of the placemats.
jdaw1 wrote:Twenty-six ports between the ten attendees (is that enough?);
jdaw1 wrote:Two sets of sticky-label sheets:
Large bottle labels, two of each (for front and back), eight per sheet, and
jdaw1 wrote:Other comment welcomed.
DRT to adjudicate.RAYC wrote:Too many? I am bringing an unknown and a peculiar on the basis that neither may be drinkable, but i would have thought max 20 overall?jdaw1 wrote:Twenty-six ports between the ten attendees (is that enough?);
One back and one front helps. Rather than hollering “where is n?”, one has a greater chance of seeing it and gently asking somebody nearby.RAYC wrote:Last year Tom provided decanters with 10 decanter neck tags numbered 1-10 (or thereabouts). If the same is to be done this year, we might only need sticky labels for ports 11 onward. Are two labels per bottle desireable?jdaw1 wrote:Two sets of sticky-label sheets:
Large bottle labels, two of each (for front and back), eight per sheet, and
I guessed so. If you disagree, easily changed.RAYC wrote:WOTN currenlty split over two pages - is this felt to be easier to use?
Instruct.RAYC wrote:Should there be categories? (best peculiar, best unknown)
RAYC wrote:Should the numbering on the small glass labels be restricted to the shaded background number only, allowing us to write clearly the identity of the port onto the label after the big reveal?
You want to remove content to add writing space, and then to replace the writing space with clutter.RAYC wrote:Can we have small christmas trees or holly bushels in the corners of or background to the sticky labels? Or at least a star of Bethlehem...(butchered from the star quality tasting know-how)?!
Probably not. Failing contrary instruction, it will be removed.RAYC wrote:Despite being the cork display's biggest fan, i do wonder whether it will work in this type of set-up (though happy to keep and try to make work!)
jdaw1 wrote:RAYC wrote:Should the numbering on the small glass labels be restricted to the shaded background number only, allowing us to write clearly the identity of the port onto the label after the big reveal?You want to remove content to add writing space, and then to replace the writing space with clutter.RAYC wrote:Can we have small christmas trees or holly bushels in the corners of or background to the sticky labels? Or at least a star of Bethlehem...(butchered from the star quality tasting know-how)?!Anyway, writing on the foot of the glass will probably be too fiddly. (And what does a “star of Bethlehem” look like?)

RAYC wrote:Should the numbering on the small glass labels be restricted to the shaded background number only, allowing us to write clearly the identity of the port onto the label after the big reveal?
Not sure that I like entirely removing the words, but something can be done.RAYC wrote:writing F66, T27 etc. on the foot of the glass was exactly what a number of us did last year to keep track of what we were writing.
As this is a "drinking" rather than a "tasting" I tend to agree with Rob that 20 might be considered to be enough. However, as always, the team will do there duty regardless of how many bottles turn up on the night.jdaw1 wrote:DRT to adjudicate.RAYC wrote:Too many? I am bringing an unknown and a peculiar on the basis that neither may be drinkable, but i would have thought max 20 overall?jdaw1 wrote:Twenty-six ports between the ten attendees (is that enough?);
He might have meant “which doesn't necessarily have to be Vintage”, but one can’t be sure with DRT.DRT wrote:the entry fee is 1 bottle of unknown or unusual Port (which doesn't necessarily have to be Port).
Typically on the next day one realises that the dose was too small.WS1 wrote:out of my experience these " in the beginning I thought this is a good idea" actions never held the excitement the next day.
jdaw1 wrote:He might have meant “which doesn't necessarily have to be Vintage”, but one can’t be sure with DRT.DRT wrote:the entry fee is 1 bottle of unknown or unusual Port (which doesn't necessarily have to be Port).
Return to Organising Tastings and Get-togethers
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests