jdaw1 wrote:In London I have Sandeman 1977.
Good decision. But why 2 x QH?jdaw1 wrote:I thought about RAYC’s questions, and reached the obvious decision.
DRT wrote:Good decision. But why 2 x QH?jdaw1 wrote:I thought about RAYC’s questions, and reached the obvious decision.
Incompetence. Fixed. Leaving a space for something else!DRT wrote:But why 2 x QH?
RAYC wrote:DRT wrote:Good decision. But why 2 x QH?jdaw1 wrote:I thought about RAYC’s questions, and reached the obvious decision.
Maybe jdaw1 needs reminding that we will require at least 3 bottles of Dow 77!
DB is saying, in very polite and delicate words translated directly from German, that we might not have enough bottles. We have a problem.DrDirk wrote:Somebody is really thirsty.
jdaw1 wrote:My preferences include Niepoort Cálem Morgan.
jdaw1 wrote:Your list includes some ports that have become regulars at our tastings. If no guest, could we lose a regular rather than an obscure?
So, does that mean Calem and Morgan are not regulars?RAYC wrote:jdaw1 wrote:Your list includes some ports that have become regulars at our tastings. If no guest, could we lose a regular rather than an obscure?
The only bottle from this list that i have drunk more than twice in 2011 is, i believe, the Taylor 77...
2x attendees at tastings i have attended include the Fonseca, Niepoort, Warre, Gould Campbell and Quarles Harris.
You are right though - Morgan and Calem have not had TPF outings for some time.
jdaw1 wrote:I hereby appoint RAYC to be Supreme Dictator of the 3rd-Jan tasting of 1977s. I humbly beseech his Supreme Dictatorship, in the light of the preferences expressed, to decide in the interest of his people what is in and what is not.
AHB wrote:Morgan '77 is OK. I quite enjoy it (therefore it must be light and evolved).
Return to Organising Tastings and Get-togethers
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests