We need to harangue him and also Ian Wright.Derek T. wrote:No. He's not a member. Yet.jdaw1 wrote:
- CG (have I missed his TPF ID?)
The "Deeper Underground" Offline (28 Jan 2008)
-
KillerB
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Sky Blue City, England
Re: 1966 horizontal: people
Port is basically a red drink
List amended.
My brother writes “I'm in for Port if the numbers matter†. List amended.
No. And he’s nice.
No. And he’s nice.
Re: 1966 horizontal: people
I know why CG isn't a member and haranguing is not necessary and will not work. I plan to speak to him at the Offline and expect him to be a member shortly thereafter. I also know he reads this Forum so he may decide to join anyway.KillerB wrote:We need to harangue him and also Ian Wright.Derek T. wrote:No. He's not a member. Yet.jdaw1 wrote:
- CG (have I missed his TPF ID?)
I don't know why Ian Wright isn't a member, but it may be because he is too busy being a football pundit. Harangue away.
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
With so many people and so many wines I think we need to enforce some control on the distribution and tasting of the wines. This has developed into one of the world's greatest tastings of 1966 Vintage Port and for that reason the wines deserve some respect.
My suggestion would be that we serve the port in flights, each consisting of between 1 and 4 wines. One or two safe pairs of hands should be appointed to control the pours to ensure all participants are offered equal measure of each port. Self service will not work with these numbers.
I think it is also essential that we do not leave the expected stars to the end as (a) our tastbuds will be tired and (b) some people might be asleep or too drunk to know what they are tasting.
As a starting point I would suggest we serve the ports in the following order:
Flight 1: The Guest of Honour
Derek
My suggestion would be that we serve the port in flights, each consisting of between 1 and 4 wines. One or two safe pairs of hands should be appointed to control the pours to ensure all participants are offered equal measure of each port. Self service will not work with these numbers.
I think it is also essential that we do not leave the expected stars to the end as (a) our tastbuds will be tired and (b) some people might be asleep or too drunk to know what they are tasting.
As a starting point I would suggest we serve the ports in the following order:
Flight 1: The Guest of Honour
- Adam's.
- Croft;
- Fonseca;
- Taylor's.
- Dow's;
- Graham's;
- Warre's;
- Berry Bros.
- Delaforce;
- Offley Boa Vista;
- Morgan
- Avery's;
- Quinta do Noval;
- Robertson's Rebello Valente.
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
I’ll rework sheets so that things can be partitioned
Works for me. I’ll rework sheets so that things can be partitioned into flights.
-
Alex Bridgeman
- Graham’s 1948
- Posts: 14906
- Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
I very much support the idea of tasting in flights and really like the groupings that you have suggested.
My only small piece of advice would be to pour the wines in advance of the tasting starting, so that all 14 glasses are filled for all 14 people. We also need to bear in mind that we will probably want to eat before starting on the port.
We need 196 glasses so I will speak with Ian today to see if we can order more than the 144 that we already have on their way. I will also see if it would be possible for us to eat in one tunnel and then drink the port in the other. That way we will be able to set the port table up for everyone without risking knocking things over other then when we all sit down - when we should be at least risk of accidents since we will not have drunk a bottle of port each.
What time are we planning to start on Jan 28?
Alex
My only small piece of advice would be to pour the wines in advance of the tasting starting, so that all 14 glasses are filled for all 14 people. We also need to bear in mind that we will probably want to eat before starting on the port.
We need 196 glasses so I will speak with Ian today to see if we can order more than the 144 that we already have on their way. I will also see if it would be possible for us to eat in one tunnel and then drink the port in the other. That way we will be able to set the port table up for everyone without risking knocking things over other then when we all sit down - when we should be at least risk of accidents since we will not have drunk a bottle of port each.
What time are we planning to start on Jan 28?
Alex
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
I thought it was 13 people. Are we counting the Teddy and allocating him port? 
The two tunnell approach works for me but I suppose it depends on how busy the CP is on the night. I think you should ask Ian for a few more glasses than we think we need as we may end up with more bottles on the night. I already know of 1 that is being sought as we speak
I'm staying in London so have no train to catch so start time isn't as important to me as it is to others. I can probably be there around 5:00 to 5:30 to assist with setting up the table. How does a 6:30 start sound for everyone?
What are we drinking with the steak and chips? Does anyone fancy some port?
Derek
The two tunnell approach works for me but I suppose it depends on how busy the CP is on the night. I think you should ask Ian for a few more glasses than we think we need as we may end up with more bottles on the night. I already know of 1 that is being sought as we speak
I'm staying in London so have no train to catch so start time isn't as important to me as it is to others. I can probably be there around 5:00 to 5:30 to assist with setting up the table. How does a 6:30 start sound for everyone?
What are we drinking with the steak and chips? Does anyone fancy some port?
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
An opportunity has arrisen that I think we should all seriously consider.
As has been stated a number of times this Offline has reached legendary proportions in terms of the list of wines we will be drinking from what is widely regarded as one of the finest vintages in living memory. Yesterday evening I listed the known declared wines that are not yet in the line-up. The reaction to that post has been unsurprising in that some of our more enthusiatic members have gone off to seek out the wines on that list.
As a result of this I received an offer today which would allow us to add a bottle of Noval Nacional 1966 to the line-up. Without exception, commentators have hailed the Nacional to be one of the top three wines of the vintage.
The following may come as a shock to some of you if you are unfamiliar with Noval Nacional and we can explain further if that is the case.
The cost of the bottle is £550. We currently have 13 attendees, which would mean a cost of £42.30 each to add this bottle to the line-up.
This would have to be something that all attendees were happy with and i would therefore ask each of you to either respond here or PM/email me with your thoughts.
Derek
As has been stated a number of times this Offline has reached legendary proportions in terms of the list of wines we will be drinking from what is widely regarded as one of the finest vintages in living memory. Yesterday evening I listed the known declared wines that are not yet in the line-up. The reaction to that post has been unsurprising in that some of our more enthusiatic members have gone off to seek out the wines on that list.
As a result of this I received an offer today which would allow us to add a bottle of Noval Nacional 1966 to the line-up. Without exception, commentators have hailed the Nacional to be one of the top three wines of the vintage.
The following may come as a shock to some of you if you are unfamiliar with Noval Nacional and we can explain further if that is the case.
The cost of the bottle is £550. We currently have 13 attendees, which would mean a cost of £42.30 each to add this bottle to the line-up.
This would have to be something that all attendees were happy with and i would therefore ask each of you to either respond here or PM/email me with your thoughts.
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Axel,Axel P wrote:Sometimes it feels terrible to be so far away from the island...
Anyways the Grahams Vertical is on the 02nd of Feb, so at least this time I have something to compete with.
All the best to your tasting
Axel
I know dates and locations can be inconvenient for a myriad of humdrum reasons, but theoretically, wouldn't a quiet Monday, at a quiet time of year, and with ferries available be the sort of Off-Line you could occasionally consider? Or is it too far, too much hassle, and too expensive?
London is a nuisance for me, but I have to accept that it's central(for the South of England!
)Alan.
I’m in if there’s a team consensus
I’m in (twice) if there’s a team consensus. But fourteen ports is more than enough to fuzz my palate — I am unconvinced that it won’t be wasteful.
Re: I’m in if there’s a team consensus
There are many in the world that would argue that thirteen grown men spending around £3000 (without the Nacional) on port, steak, trains and hotels is in itself inherintly wasteful. But what would they knowjdaw1 wrote:I’m in (twice) if there’s a team consensus. But fourteen ports is more than enough to fuzz my palate — I am unconvinced that it won’t be wasteful.
It is all about making sure you tick off those water counters on the tasting mat to keep your palate fresh. I agree that we will tire, which is why I suggested the flights. One cannot attend a legendary horizontal tasting if the horizontal line is not of legendary proportions.
I seem to recall us having a similar debate in preparation for the F-Plan.
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Kenyan-style vote counting.
Either some of the votes have not been cast in the official ballot box (this thread), or this is Kenyan-style vote counting.Derek T. wrote:Votes FOR including the Nacional 1966: 6
Votes AGAINST including the Nacional 1966: 0
Re: Kenyan-style vote counting.
Voters had the option of casting their vote in the Caucusses or the Primaries. Only you have voted publicly.jdaw1 wrote: Either some of the votes have not been cast in the official ballot box (this thread), or this is Kenyan-style vote counting.
Current updated score is:
Votes FOR including the Nacional 1966: 7
Votes AGAINST including the Nacional 1966: 1
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
KillerB
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Sky Blue City, England
Re: Kenyan-style vote counting.
Please note:jdaw1 wrote:Either some of the votes have not been cast in the official ballot box (this thread), or this is Kenyan-style vote counting.Derek T. wrote:Votes FOR including the Nacional 1966: 6
Votes AGAINST including the Nacional 1966: 0
You would have thought that an admin would have checked the facts before posting, would you not?Derek T. wrote:either respond here or PM/email me with your thoughts.
Port is basically a red drink
In the past 48 hours it seems Jdaw has been suffering from some sort of trauma resulting in him:
- missing apostrophes
- missing charachters out of words
- grovelling to other Admins
- using emoticons
- not checking facts
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
{Looks ashamed.}
{Looks ashamed.}
The swingometer
Current updated score is:
Votes FOR including the Nacional 1966: 8
Votes AGAINST including the Nacional 1966: 1
Derek
Votes FOR including the Nacional 1966: 8
Votes AGAINST including the Nacional 1966: 1
Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn