Page 1 of 1

’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 15:48 Sat 13 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
From the double-horizontal, 1983 and 1985, on Saturday 13 September 2008 at the home of jfacciol in Brooklyn.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 17:24 Sat 13 Sep 2008
by SushiNorth
Dow 85 decanted at 10:45pm on Friday, Graham's 83 decanted at 11:45am Saturday.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 17:52 Sat 13 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
G85 and NN85 decanted shortly after 11am Saturday.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 07:39 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
Jay hosted yet another fantastic evening. Photographs and commentary tomorrow.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 17:36 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
The bottles, as photographed late in the evening.
Image

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 18:00 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
About to start:
Image
Image

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 18:01 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
The ports:
Image
Image
Image

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 18:03 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
Later in the evening
Image

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 18:53 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
In all five houses I preferred the ’85. Most males present agreed, with scores averaging 4-1. (The ladies preferred the ’83s.) In all five houses ’85 had better fruit than ’83, and the spirit was more overt in the ’83.

It is always fabulous to see one’s prejudices reaffirmed. Hurray!

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 22:24 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by DRT
This seems to have been a fun evening. Any chance someone can put names to faces, pease?

Derek

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 22:47 Sun 14 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
Image
Left-to-right: Molly E. B.; Subir G.; Dave C. = differentdave; Jay = jfaciol; EricD.; Michael W. = TBird.

Off to the viewer’s left are Stephanie and Jeff Ghi, and yours truly is behind the camera.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 00:03 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by DRT
Thanks for that.

Interesting to see the depth of colour of the Dow and GC 83s. These seem as dark as the F85 which is normally very dark. The NNs seem very mature from a colour perspective alone. Not what one might expect from these. I wonder if the bottles you had are typical of these NN vintages? I don't think I have had either of these.

Great pictures and great notes. Thanks.

Derek

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 15:17 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by g-man
Finally got around to posting. Busy with family stuff and getting caught up with friends who work at lehman. Rough times, especially with a port hangover.

I'm trying to find my tasting notes but I'm not sure where I put them.

Wine of the night for drinking now was the Fonseca 83, which I believe got 4 votes for first.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 17:57 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1983 as wine of the night! Very interesting considering the reputation of this wine as being a "weak" Fonseca. I'm glad you pitched it against the Grahams '83 and '85, which are wines I know and love.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 18:17 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by g-man
AHB wrote:Fonseca 1983 as wine of the night! Very interesting considering the reputation of this wine as being a "weak" Fonseca. I'm glad you pitched it against the Grahams '83 and '85, which are wines I know and love.
me and julian both voted for the graham's 83 as wine of the night but were overruled by the majority since we were the only two votes for the Grahams.

A common comment I heard about the Fonseca is the delicate balance and for the non everyday port drinking people was the least like "cough syrup". They also refer to the spiciness of the finish and talked about the lack of "dryness" that was apparent in the dows.

In terms of drinking in some future date, the Fonseca 85 was the clear winner.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 18:24 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by jdaw1
g-man wrote:me and julian both voted for the graham's 83 as wine of the night but were overruled by the majority since we were the only two votes for the Grahams.
Correction: I voted, for drinking now, G85. For drinking at peak, F85.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 18:41 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by g-man
ah yes, I voted for the grahams 85 then too.

I'll repost once I find my notes again as I've marked the wines with their total votes.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 19:26 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by TBird
my notes are missing in action too. :oops: :? they'll pop up. 88)

thanks for a great evening. i think i was kicked out at the end? :lol:

despite going the wrong way on the F, i made it home intact. how hard could it be, i stated earlier in the evening... :shock:

thanks again! :)

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brookl

Posted: 20:08 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by SushiNorth
Two lonely bottles, settling in the basement...

Image

As we prepared for another special evening.

Image

With lots of familiar faces... (L-R: TBird, JDaw, G-Man, Steph, Molly, Subir)
Image

(And our host said a few words)
Image

Full of pretty colors
Image

and the familiar sights of a tasting...
Image

Image

We wrapped up quite happy...
Image

And in good form.
Image

Thanks again to our host jfacciol for the lovely evening, to g-man for that excellent pork, jdaw for supplies/glass/etc, and everyone for the good company.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brookl

Posted: 21:51 Mon 15 Sep 2008
by SushiNorth
Well that was really a lovely evening, and I've just enjoyed writing up my chicken scratch as legitimate notes (and replaying the evening -- sans red drink).

Several things struck me over the course of the night. One was that my numbers are on target (whew!) -- TBird and I found ourselves consistently in lock step, and I'd no idea G-man and I both gave the F85 a 96 until this very moment. Another was that my sense of direct smell is as lacking as I'd feared, but that
A) this "back of the pharanx (Nasopharanx was it, gman?)" thing is quite effective. I smelled more of the port by basically inhaling through my mouth than my nose.
B) the whole "cover the glass and swirl" thing works really well for me.

I also made a bunch of notes that are worth sharing...
Avoid Vesuvio 06 and 08 as E. was all up in that.
regarding big tastings: "You drink 30 or 40 things... [hanging head] and you get confused." - jdaw.
Prior to 1970, who bottled it mattered.
Grahams 83 and 80 need to be compared.

and, most important, many people are up for drinkings. I think we need a whole different classification for them, as a Drinking differs from a Tasting:
Casual, no need for placemats. Drinkers outnumber bottles 2:1. Good food is a key part of the equation. Impromptu: if we're planning it for more than a few days it might as well become a Tasting.

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 01:58 Tue 16 Sep 2008
by g-man
F 83 3 votes - Dave, Molly, Steph
G 85 2 votes - Julian, Jeff
F 85 2 votes - Subir, Josh
G 83 1 vote - Eric
Dow 85 1 vote - Jay
GC 83 1 vote - Mike

G-Man's personal ranking- I kept ranking after the initial tasting pre-food .. When Julian mentioned it, I realized I was suffering from palate fatigue and I believe I might have skewed the noval's higher then my initial thoughts.

D83 - 87
D85 - 91
GC83 - 87
GC85 - 84
G83- 92
G85- 93
F83- 88
F85- 96
NN83- 79
NN85 - 86

Re: ’83 and ’85 Double-horizontal, Sat 13 Sept ’08, Brooklyn

Posted: 20:17 Wed 17 Sep 2008
by TBird
i finally found my notes/impressions. :oops:

my favorite two were:
1) taylor 85 - complex and young, milk chocolate cherries with cinnamon and dark berries.

2) gould campbell 83 - raspberry kirsch & dark chocolate cherries, just gorgeous.

i guess in a way they now look vaguely similar but i don't recall thinking that way at the time.

to copy gmans way of scoring, i'll go:

D83 - 90
D85 - 93
GC83 - 94
GC85 - 91
G83 - 89
G85 - 92
F83 - 93
F85 - 95
NN83 - 79 - flawed
NN85 - 87