Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
All of those count. Are there any others in other?jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
I forgot about them. That proves that they don’t count. QED. ∎DRT wrote:All of those count.jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
But I didn't forget about them, so they count. On this occassion you are wrong. Not even a maybe, just wrong. They count.jdaw1 wrote:I forgot about them. That proves that they don’t count. QED.DRT wrote:All of those count. Are there any others in other?jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
GM26? Royal Oporto anything? Maybe the nuns. Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93? I have a degree in mathematics, so I know about counting. And most of those couldn’t count to ℵ0.DRT wrote:But I didn't forget about them, so they count. On this occassion you are wrong. Not even a maybe, just wrong. They count.jdaw1 wrote:I forgot about them. That proves that they don’t count. QED.DRT wrote:All of those count. Are there any others in other?jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
jdaw1 wrote:GM26? Royal Oporto anything? Maybe the nuns. Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93? I have a degree in mathematics, so I know about counting. And most of those couldn’t count to ℵ0.DRT wrote:But I didn't forget about them, so they count. On this occassion you are wrong. Not even a maybe, just wrong. They count.jdaw1 wrote:I forgot about them. That proves that they don’t count. QED.DRT wrote:All of those count. Are there any others in other?jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
Careless: I meant GL26, not GM. That reprimand accepted. Though you meant “Pinhão”. Anyway, they still couldn’t count to ℵ0. (Is it yet worth splitting this thread? More effort needed—OK, we continue.)DRT wrote:jdaw1 wrote:GM26? Royal Oporto anything? Maybe the nuns. Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93? I have a degree in mathematics, so I know about counting. And most of those couldn’t count to ℵ0.DRT wrote:But I didn't forget about them, so they count. On this occassion you are wrong. Not even a maybe, just wrong. They count.jdaw1 wrote:I forgot about them. That proves that they don’t count. QED.DRT wrote:All of those count. Are there any others in other?jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
"GM26"? Don't you mean "The only vintage of Graham's Quinta das Lages ever produced"? ("GM"?)
"Royal Oporto anything"? Don't you mean "Quinta das Carvalhas, one of the most prominent landmarks when arriving at Pinhao"?
"Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93?" Don't you mean the only VP in existance from that vintage?
In a world of port trivia your degree in mathematics and your own perception of your ability to count are both irrelevant. The above are port-geektastic facts. They count better than you can.
WARNING: Time Tunnel approaching!jdaw1 wrote:Careless: I meant GL26, not GM. That reprimand accepted. But they still couldn’t count to ℵ0. (Is it yet worth splitting this thread? More effort needed—OK, we continue.)DRT wrote:jdaw1 wrote:GM26? Royal Oporto anything? Maybe the nuns. Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93? I have a degree in mathematics, so I know about counting. And most of those couldn’t count to ℵ0.DRT wrote:But I didn't forget about them, so they count. On this occassion you are wrong. Not even a maybe, just wrong. They count.jdaw1 wrote:I forgot about them. That proves that they don’t count. QED.DRT wrote:All of those count. Are there any others in other?jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
"GM26"? Don't you mean "The only vintage of Graham's Quinta das Lages ever produced"? ("GM"?)
"Royal Oporto anything"? Don't you mean "Quinta das Carvalhas, one of the most prominent landmarks when arriving at Pinhao"?
"Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93?" Don't you mean the only VP in existance from that vintage?
In a world of port trivia your degree in mathematics and your own perception of your ability to count are both irrelevant. The above are port-geektastic facts. They count better than you can.
They count. You need to learn when to concede.DRT wrote:WARNING: Time Tunnel approaching!jdaw1 wrote:Careless: I meant GL26, not GM. That reprimand accepted. But they still couldn’t count to ℵ0. (Is it yet worth splitting this thread? More effort needed—OK, we continue.)DRT wrote:jdaw1 wrote:GM26? Royal Oporto anything? Maybe the nuns. Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93? I have a degree in mathematics, so I know about counting. And most of those couldn’t count to ℵ0.DRT wrote:But I didn't forget about them, so they count. On this occassion you are wrong. Not even a maybe, just wrong. They count.jdaw1 wrote:I forgot about them. That proves that they don’t count. QED.DRT wrote:All of those count. Are there any others in other?jdaw1 wrote:Only relevant to Graham Quinta das Lages, Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas, Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, and Quinta das Liceiras, none of which really count, so I wrapped it in to “other”.DRT wrote:You forgot "das".
"GM26"? Don't you mean "The only vintage of Graham's Quinta das Lages ever produced"? ("GM"?)
"Royal Oporto anything"? Don't you mean "Quinta das Carvalhas, one of the most prominent landmarks when arriving at Pinhao"?
"Liceiras 1993, for those whose children were not born in ’93?" Don't you mean the only VP in existance from that vintage?
In a world of port trivia your degree in mathematics and your own perception of your ability to count are both irrelevant. The above are port-geektastic facts. They count better than you can.
I'm not wrong.jdaw1 wrote:If you’re going to start doing two consecutive posts, then that isn’t playing fair. Which proves that you know you’re wrong.
Splittage imminent.
This is the real reason I am not wrong.Glenn E. wrote:"das" is the only other preposition available
You’re not wrong about that. But nor was I to bundle it into “other”. We’re both right.DRT wrote:This is the real reason I am not wrong.Glenn E. wrote:"das" is the only other preposition available
I accept your surrender.jdaw1 wrote:Split from Quinta prepositions by jdaw1.
Considering that this post was made at 8.08a.m., I salute your early-morning Port-drinking abilities!AHB wrote:I can't believe I've just spent 5 minutes of my life reading this thread. What a waste of time when I could have been drinking port instead.
AHB wrote:I can't believe I've just spent 5 minutes of my life reading this thread. What a waste of time when I could have been drinking port instead.
JacobH wrote:Considering that this post was made at 8.08a.m., I salute your early-morning Port-drinking abilities!AHB wrote:I can't believe I've just spent 5 minutes of my life reading this thread. What a waste of time when I could have been drinking port instead.
AHB wrote:I can't believe I've just spent 5 minutes of my life reading this thread. What a waste of time when I could have been drinking port instead.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest