1977 Graham

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

1977 Graham's vintage port

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

In celebration of the fact that I have just agreed to buy some more of these, I decided to open a bottle of Graham's 1977 vintage port for enjoyment and delictation tonight. Decanted at 6am. The bottle was sealed with a lead capsule (stamped as "Graham's 1977") over the sello, itself placed over the aluminium cellar capsule. The cellar capsule was corroded but the cork in very good condition. The bottle showed signs of mould on the label, which I took to be an indication of storage in humid conditions. The cork was extracted using a long-thread T-bar style corkscrew and came out almost in one piece. The cork was sound and branded "Graham's 1977 Vintage".

The wine was pale when decanted and smelt oddly of petrol. I did not try any of it, not sure why. Most of the sediment was left in the bottle, which had been stood upright for 3 days.

More notes later.

Alex
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

Post by KillerB »

AHB wrote:I did not try any of it, not sure why.
Maybe because:
AHB wrote:The wine was pale when decanted and smelt oddly of petrol.
A pale Graham's 1977 would worry me too. Petrol?
Port is basically a red drink
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

I'm assuming that the paleness is only a feature of the immediate colour on decanting. I'm now in the office and will be unlikely to try this any earlier than 5pm, by when I would expect it to have taken on the typical thick, black colour.

The petrol nose worried me, but perhaps is just a very mild bottle stink.

I will find out in 8 hours and 12 minutes and 38 seconds...
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Now (15½ hours after decanting) a mid-red colour, not as dark as I was expecting but still strongly coloured although quite transparent.

A very fresh nose, lots of cut grass and black pepper over the top of some blackberry juice. Lovely and sweet in the mouth with lots of dark cake and huge amounts of fruit. Fabulous layers and complexity and the texture thickens up the more you swirl it around in the mouth. Just so lovely and caressing. Aftertaste is long, lingering and just doesn't stop changing. Little by way of tannins, these seem to have all resolved themselves.

Absolutely fantastic wine. Probably not going to improve much with more time in the cellar - but then it doesn't have anywhere to go anyway! 9/9 or 95/100.

Superb.
Last edited by Alex Bridgeman on 21:56 Tue 29 Apr 2008, edited 1 time in total.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
KillerB
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2425
Joined: 22:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Sky Blue City, England

Post by KillerB »

TGFT - I was ready to tell Julian to keep 'em.
Port is basically a red drink
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Post by DRT »

KillerB wrote:TGFT - I was ready to tell Julian to keep 'em.
Me too! :lol:
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Julian’s enthusiasm for selling so many has diminished.

Post by jdaw1 »

Julian’s enthusiasm for selling so many has diminished. Quite a lot.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 1977 Graham's vintage port

Post by DRT »

AHB wrote: The wine was pale when decanted and smelt oddly of petrol.
I think Julian should focus on this observation from AHB.

Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
RonnieRoots
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1981
Joined: 08:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: Middle Earth

Re: Julian’s enthusiasm for selling so many has diminished.

Post by RonnieRoots »

jdaw1 wrote:Julian’s enthusiasm for selling so many has diminished. Quite a lot.
How did I miss out on this deal? :?: :crying:
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Oops, sorry. Clearly my mistake.

This wasn't a Graham's 1977 I opened. It was a Churchill Graham's. Here's the tasting note on the Graham's I opened in a hurry to correct my error.

5 hours decanting time.
Horrid. Smells of cat-puke and VA. Tastes like petrol in a nasty way. Aftertaste is revolting and has you retching before you reach out for your toothbrush. The rest of the bottle was used as toilet cleaner. 0/0 or 0/100. If you have any of these, sell them as fast as you can to people you call "friends".
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
RonnieRoots
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1981
Joined: 08:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: Middle Earth

Post by RonnieRoots »

Wow, a Churchill Graham from 5 years before the first official declaration! And a 95 pointer nonetheless!! You lucky b#stard. :wink: :lol:
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3518
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Post by uncle tom »

I last opened one of these in January last year (and have just put another bottle on death row)

I noted that it took a long time to come round, and needed 24hrs+ in decanter. After that, it was much improved.

Tom
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Post Reply