1991 Graham

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
SushiNorth
Martinez 1985
Posts: 1341
Joined: 07:45 Mon 18 Feb 2008
Location: NJ & NY

1991 Graham

Post by SushiNorth »

Tasted at a vertical of drinkable Graham's Vintage Ports from the past 50 years, held on the ever auspicious Friday the Thirteenth (February 2009) and hosted graciously by jfacciol.
Links: Review; 1960; 1963; 1966; 1970; 1977; 1980; 1983; 1985; 1991; 1994; Planning
JoshDrinksPort
Image Port wine should perhaps be added -- A Trollope
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1991 Graham

Post by jdaw1 »

Graham’s 1991: Another horrible bottle stinker, though not as strongly as the ’85.
User avatar
SushiNorth
Martinez 1985
Posts: 1341
Joined: 07:45 Mon 18 Feb 2008
Location: NJ & NY

Re: 1991 Graham

Post by SushiNorth »

+9 Opaque, it looks like wet red velvet. There's a huge vegetal stinkiness to this nose (Bottle stink). To taste, it's very light and consistent throughout. Chocolate and some light cherry. My tasting notes label it "junk," the placemat is blunter: "suck!" 85.
JoshDrinksPort
Image Port wine should perhaps be added -- A Trollope
Post Reply