1985 Ramos Pinto

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1985 Ramos-Pinto

Post by jdaw1 »

[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=3412]Here[/url] jdaw1 wrote:Question needing an answer by Saturday. For nine adults at a slightly belated Thanksgiving lunch to be held on Sunday (Brit, Paris, not the official day of Thanksgiving: I am not interested in hearing it) I will be serving three bottles of reasonable fake champagne, several bottles of an acceptable Bordeaux, and then three bottles of 1985 port.
Resulting in:
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Ramos-Pinto

Post by jdaw1 »

Ramos-Pinto 1985, at D+0. Youthful dark, hint of purple, quite opaque. Slightly more translucent F85, but, visually, could pass for it. Nosing of a full plummy fruit. Like taste, though with and for my preferences marred by a slightly grittiness of texture. Mid-weight; mid-length.

SCP-DFF nosed ‟succulent raspberry smell” (which I didn’t get), and ‟almost smokey” (which I think is almost right). Our daughter (aged 3) nosed ‟grapes”, which was definitely correct.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Ramos-Pinto

Post by jdaw1 »

RP85, from D+4hr to D+8hr. Great mid-weight texture, oily and unctuous. Some heat early palate; good acidity. Plum fruit, mid sweetness. More heat, more overtly alcoholic, than the Churchill. Far far better than RO85; unanimously worse that the Ch85, though by a far small margin.

Sabrina: cherries.
Suzy: raw cocoa aftertaste.
Christophe: ‟very peppery and dry wood”.
Post Reply