1970 Graham

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
DRT
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14926
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

1970 Graham

Post by DRT » 02:26 Sun 21 Mar 2010

"The first duty of Port is to be red"

Ernest H. Cockburn

User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19399
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1970 Graham

Post by jdaw1 » 23:15 Mon 22 Mar 2010

Alas I was unable to take a tasting note of this port.

User avatar
AHB
Fonseca 1970
Posts: 10717
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1970 Graham

Post by AHB » 13:46 Tue 23 Mar 2010

Clear centre, but a well pigmented mature looking wine and lighter than the '66 shown alongside. A dusty nose that opened up as it sat in the glass and was at its best 3-4 hours after the tasting started when it was soft, full of cinnamon and a fabulous fruitcake. Assertive entry, dense and concentrated; still very young but the tannins are nicely subdued by the fruit on the palate. Big and mouthfilling, sweet and very fruity. The aftertaste is sweet, initially hot and very big. One to tuck away with the '66s. My wine of the night. 95/100.
Top Port in 2017 (so far): Taylor 2010 LBV
2016 Port of the year: Cockburn 1908

User avatar
JacobH
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2283
Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: 1970 Graham

Post by JacobH » 13:23 Thu 25 Mar 2010

Same colour as the 1966. Dramatic nose with lots of fruit, although some felt too stewed compared to the elegance of the 1966. Excellent in the mouth, still lots of fruit, as one would expect.
Image

Andy Velebil
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2378
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

1970 Graham’s Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil » 05:17 Fri 30 Jul 2010

1970 Graham’s Vintage Port:
Still a medium ruby I was surprised the 1966 was darker. With its complex nose full of young plums this was also a bottle I enjoyed just smelling. Like the 1966, this was full bodied and had an amazing sensation of building in the mouth as it led into a huge full finish. One of the better showing of this I’ve had recently. 95 Points

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests