NV Graham Crusted 2002

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
angeleyes
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 235
Joined: 14:53 Tue 11 Aug 2009
Location: SE27
Contact:

2002 Graham's Crusted

Post by angeleyes » 22:18 Thu 25 Mar 2010

D+1.5 Herby nose. Sweet, not cloying, medium finish. Juicy acidity that might be approaching VA. Big tannins. Should be good for a few years but not the long term.

D+27 Nose not so strong and seems sweeter. Acidity has faded in favour of this sweetness.

D+72 Heat and tannin most prominent. Sweet. Little else, but still pretty good drinking. I'd say it's on par with a good ruby.
Mark

User avatar
AHB
Fonseca 1970
Posts: 10724
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 2002 Graham's Crusted

Post by AHB » 22:17 Tue 30 Mar 2010

I would be a little disappointed with this result. In my mind, a crusted port should be better than an unfiltered LBV and certainly much better than a ruby. You are drinking a blend (and therefore the extra complexity brought by a blend) of years and lotes which just failed to make the vintage blend.

Where did you buy the bottle?
Top Port in 2017 (so far): Taylor 2010 LBV
2016 Port of the year: Cockburn 1908

User avatar
angeleyes
Quinta do Noval LBV
Posts: 235
Joined: 14:53 Tue 11 Aug 2009
Location: SE27
Contact:

Re: 2002 Graham's Crusted

Post by angeleyes » 12:18 Tue 20 Apr 2010

AHB wrote:Where did you buy the bottle?
It was on a Sainsbury's 25% deal. Yes, I thought it ought to much better bearing in mind the wines that make it up, though it had a rough tannic edge that needs a few years.
Mark

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests