1960 Martinez

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply


Re: 1960 Martinez

Post by Deleted_User_1 » 06:05 Sat 22 May 2010

This is a story you could not make up!!

Well you know on the night of the 1960 horizontal for Uncle Tom's 50th this wine showed about as average as it can get. Quite an offensive nose of almost 'petrol' then the acidic entry followed by a gush of citrus fruit...especially oranges...then a jammy/marmalade finish....Funnily (delibberate for JDAW) enough exactly the same as the last bottle...so there is consistency. Both were decanted some 4 hours before consumption.

By mistake...and I have to admit due to a large imbibement of beer followed by a solo attack on a G77... which was excellent by the way ...I clearly decided to decant the M60 and then retired to bed at around 2.00am and thought no more of it.

At 3.00pm the following day..and very slightly hungover, I spoke with Uncle Tom about travel arrangements and then I proceeded to uncork my contribution for that evenings gathering....the M60... The wine behaved superbly with the cork coming out in only 3309 separate pieces....I thought that had happened recently but did not know when.

I reached for my favourite decanter only to find it full of wine...where did that come from?..I sobbed...Eventually realising that this task had already taken place some hours earlier. :oops:

Having tasted a small sample from each I travelled to the venue with the most recently decanted offering.. but have to report it was not great...hence my initial comments...but...this evening...3 days after the event I have visited the extra decanted M60 (not wanting to waste hrd earnt cash) and what a surprise...it is delicious... the 'petrol' nose has been replaced with a jammy/citrus combination. The entry is smooth and quite complex, the middle has a sharp citrus almost grapefruit and the finish is short but still has a decent amount of heat....Moral of the story is clear...Martinez.(any) decant and drink 3 days later...Simples. :lol:

User avatar
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 21376
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London

Re: 1960 Martinez

Post by jdaw1 » 19:16 Tue 25 May 2010

Mz60: My only note said ‟foul”.

User avatar
Chris Doty
Warre’s Otima 20 year old Tawny
Posts: 690
Joined: 12:30 Fri 29 Jan 2010

Re: 1960 Martinez

Post by Chris Doty » 12:26 Mon 07 Jun 2010

Clearly flawed. Not much to add.

User avatar
Fonseca 1963
Posts: 12206
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1960 Martinez

Post by AHB » 10:42 Sun 27 Jun 2010

Almost as dark in colour as the Warre 1960 shown alongside. Mature redcurrants on the nose; quite hot and full of dust and nutmeg. Slightly musty entry, with good flavours but what seems to be something of a characteristic bitterness from the vintage. Not balanced, still with some tannins showing through. Dry tannins on the aftertaste, mixed in with sweet and sticky red fruit, but very short. 83/100. Drunk after much less than 3 days decanting.
Top Ports in 2018 (so far): Niepoort VV (1960's Bottling), Quinta do Noval Nacional 1994 and San Leonardo Very Old White (Bottled 2018)
2017 Ports of the year: Fonseca 1927 and Quinta do Noval 1927

User avatar
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15428
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK

Re: 1960 Martinez

Post by DRT » 17:22 Thu 14 Oct 2010

My note says: "Baby's nappy on the nose"

I recall being challenged on the above description on the night and qualified it by confirming I was referring to the medicinal smell of an unsoiled, freshly applied nappy.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn

Post Reply