1955 Niepoort

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1955 Niepoort

Post by jdaw1 »

Ni55: red-orange. Nosing, deliciously, of orange-marmalade. A big port, unctuous and orangey. Also cedar-wood. Some heat mid-palate. CMAG rightly said ‟weird”, but not in a bad way. CRS: ‟exotic”.

In the second flight competition (Mk, Mz, Ni, N, O, S, T, and W) scoring 19 points, being ranked first by five including me and second by two, for the Silver Medal of this flight. (Though I thought Niepoort deserved first place, it was only an edge ahead of third-placed 17-pointed Noval.)
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 1955 Niepoort

Post by DRT »

Lovely nose of boiled sweets and spice. Thick and unctuous - delicious juice. This was my favourite of the second flight and 3rd or 4th overall.

This proved to be something of a ‘Marmite’ experience. One half of the table loved it whilst the other half hated it (some more vocally than was really necessary in civilised company).
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14902
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1955 Niepoort

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Provided by the kindness of Dirk Niepoort. Decanted from a dumpy bottle. Light red - more burnt sienna - in colour, 40% opaque. A lovely nose, very floral and with some interesting mild lime. Thick in texture, full of clover honey mixed in with rich fruit, cherry and kumquat. Rather empty on the aftertaste and with a very low level finish. Pleasant wine. 85/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
Chris Doty
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 843
Joined: 12:30 Fri 29 Jan 2010

Re: 1955 Niepoort

Post by Chris Doty »

Perhaps the disappointment of the evening. This smelled/tasted exactly like that house party in '03 when all that maple syrup wound up in the pool. Not ideal. Huge chlorine component, mixed with cheap brown sugar. Not my cup o tea (but at least the bottle is a treasure!). 78 points.
User avatar
Axel P
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2027
Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
Contact:

Re: 1955 Niepoort

Post by Axel P »

Just had the German part of the tasting (55 @ 55). Along with the Niepoort there were: Croft, Cockburn, Dow, Fonseca, Graham, Gonzales Byass, Noval, Mc Kenzie, Martinez, Taylors, Warre and a Burmester Colheita.

All Ports showed outstandingly well, none of them weak or in bad shape. Niepoort was voted WOTN. The last 55 of this I had was only overshadowed by the extremely outstanding Niepoort 45.

Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4186
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1955 Niepoort

Post by Glenn E. »

Color: Medium red.
Nose: Very nice nose - anise, something minty, green tean, orange rind, and phosphorus (like a match head).
Palate: Nice but not great. Some harshness. Didn't evolve over time as most Niepoorts do.
Finish: Lingers. Better over time.

Score: 88+ points. Concensus ranked this 2nd of the 2nd flight, behind the Taylor and ahead of the Noval by a mere half a point.
Glenn Elliott
Post Reply