2003 Churchill

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
AHB
Fonseca 1963
Posts: 12078
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

2003 Churchill vintage port

Post by AHB » 08:36 Tue 03 May 2011

Mid-red colour, red rim and opaque centre. Bottle stink on the nose. Thin entry and an acidic attack, tannins dominate the thin fruit. Big and chewy finish, full of tannin. Overall this feels unbalanced and cannot be a representative bottle. Whether this was representative or not was asked of the people manning the table, but Johnny Graham was elsewhere so the answers were vague. Not rated.
Top Ports in 2018 (so far): Niepoort VV (1960's Bottling), Quinta do Noval Nacional 1994 and San Leonardo Very Old White (Bottled 2018)
2017 Ports of the year: Fonseca 1927 and Quinta do Noval 1927
Top
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15370
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:
Contact DRT

Re: 2003 Churchill

Post by DRT » 00:18 Thu 03 Oct 2013

This doesn't appear to have a good reputation...
Screen Shot 2013-10-03 at 00.17.13.png
Screen Shot 2013-10-03 at 00.17.13.png (178.48 KiB) Viewed 985 times
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Top
ajfeather
Fonseca LBV
Posts: 122
Joined: 20:44 Thu 16 Aug 2007
Location: London, UK

Re: 2003 Churchill

Post by ajfeather » 14:09 Sun 06 Oct 2013

DRT wrote:This doesn't appear to have a good reputation...
Went for GBP199...can think of other things I'd rather buy near that point
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Port Tasting Notes”