2009 Fonseca

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14906
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 2009 Fonseca

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

More intense in colour than the Taylor 2009 shown alongside this wine. More restrained on the nose, none of the exuberance of the Taylor, but with a pleasing menthol freshness. Restrained and modest entry, lighter bodied than Taylor, but with a much more intense concentration of mid-palate fruit and more forward tannins. A little hollowness on the entry, but certainly not on the mid-palate which is fruit dominated and very impressive with big tannins. Spicy, cheek tingling aftertaste which is balanced, dry and of good length. 90-92
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
g-man
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3429
Joined: 13:50 Wed 24 Oct 2007
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: 2009 Fonseca

Post by g-man »

A very strong backbone of tannins

Plums and prunes fill out this purple fruit filled nose.

This was weird, almost disjointed.

It had a spicy licorice, eucalyptis, loads of black berries but feels like it's missing something. There's some ripe dates on the finish, but then the spices and tannins just comes back and slaps you.

It felt like it's got all of the components of a good port however something felt out of place.

I'll chalk it up to bottle shock.
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Post Reply