1952 Burmester Colheita

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20588
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1952 Burmester Colheita

Post by jdaw1 » 11:56 Sat 25 Feb 2012

B52 colheita: red-brown, 30% opaque. AHB’s torch revealed orange. Lotsof oxidation on the nose. Taste tawny. Full to mid-full. Very very long. Heat, on and off. Tastes older than it looks. Very good indeed.

Deleted_User_1

Re: 1952 Burmester Colheita

Post by Deleted_User_1 » 16:06 Sat 25 Feb 2012

B1952 Colheita....30% opaque with a lovely golden colour. Typical tawny nose with a lovely sweet entry with a flood of caramel followed by a smooth level of heat and a very very long finish. An exquisite Colheita.

User avatar
AHB
Quinta do Noval Nacional 1962
Posts: 11947
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1952 Burmester Colheita

Post by AHB » 21:43 Mon 27 Feb 2012

Does anyone know / remember when this was bottled?

Deep orange, with a slight greening rim. Lovely colheita nose - really quite lovely. Rich entry, full bodied; figs and dates with dusty tannins and balancing acidity - dominated by the dates. Delicious date finish of good length. Very fine port. 87/100.
Top Ports in 2018 (so far): Niepoort VV (1960's Bottling), Quinta do Noval Nacional 1994 and San Leonardo Very Old White (Bottled 2018)
2017 Ports of the year: Fonseca 1927 and Quinta do Noval 1927

Glenn E.
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3360
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1952 Burmester Colheita

Post by Glenn E. » 23:34 Mon 27 Feb 2012

AHB wrote:Very fine port. 87/100.
I think you mis-typed that. It should be 97, right? :shock:

I'm jealous. 1952 is typically an outstanding Colheita year. I have had a couple of other Burmester Colheitas from this era and if they were accurate reflections of Burmester's capabilities I probably would have been at least in the 94-96 range on a '52.

These exquisite Ports are wasted on you lot. :wink:
Glenn Elliott

Deleted_User_1

Re: 1952 Burmester Colheita

Post by Deleted_User_1 » 09:37 Tue 28 Feb 2012

AHB wrote:Does anyone know / remember when this was bottled?

Deep orange, with a slight greening rim. Lovely colheita nose - really quite lovely. Rich entry, full bodied; figs and dates with dusty tannins and balancing acidity - dominated by the dates. Delicious date finish of good length. Very fine port. 87/100.
This was bottled in 2010.

Deleted_User_1

Re: 1952 Burmester Colheita

Post by Deleted_User_1 » 09:40 Tue 28 Feb 2012

Glenn E. wrote:
AHB wrote:Very fine port. 87/100.
I think you mis-typed that. It should be 97, right? :shock:

I'm jealous. 1952 is typically an outstanding Colheita year. I have had a couple of other Burmester Colheitas from this era and if they were accurate reflections of Burmester's capabilities I probably would have been at least in the 94-96 range on a '52.

These exquisite Ports are wasted on you lot. :wink:
Speak for yourself...I am always banging on about the underestimated quality of Colheitas but I'm up against a formidable force of VP lovers....and I get that too.

Glenn E.
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3360
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1952 Burmester Colheita

Post by Glenn E. » 17:47 Tue 28 Feb 2012

Cookie wrote:
Glenn E. wrote:
AHB wrote:Very fine port. 87/100.
I think you mis-typed that. It should be 97, right? :shock:

I'm jealous. 1952 is typically an outstanding Colheita year. I have had a couple of other Burmester Colheitas from this era and if they were accurate reflections of Burmester's capabilities I probably would have been at least in the 94-96 range on a '52.

These exquisite Ports are wasted on you lot. :wink:
Speak for yourself...I am always banging on about the underestimated quality of Colheitas but I'm up against a formidable force of VP lovers....and I get that too.
Duly noted. Exception granted for Mr. Cook.
Glenn Elliott

Post Reply