1992 Delaforce

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply

User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19508
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1992 Delaforce

Post by jdaw1 » 20:28 Wed 25 Apr 2012

Image

User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19508
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1992 Delaforce

Post by jdaw1 » 22:13 Wed 25 Apr 2012

Image

User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19508
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1992 Delaforce

Post by jdaw1 » 22:13 Wed 25 Apr 2012

Cork, with image whitened:
Image

User avatar
jdaw1
Taylor 1900
Posts: 19508
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1992 Delaforce

Post by jdaw1 » 23:26 Wed 25 Apr 2012

Df92, dark dark red, 80% opaque. Nose had plums. Rich plum flavour, strong heat especially early, mid-to-light weight. Nicely constructed port.

Not in my top three, but it collected enough second, third and third-equal placement to total a respectable fourth place. Needs cellar time.

User avatar
AHB
Fonseca 1970
Posts: 10889
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1992 Delaforce

Post by AHB » 17:03 Sun 29 Apr 2012

Only 20 pipes of this vintage were bottled. Deep red in colour, 95% opaque. Violets and redcurrants on the nose, sharp and focused. Sharp edge to the attack, sweet and concentrated fruit but sharply acidic. A good concentration of fruit, with sharp blackberries on the lingering finish. Enjoyable and promising. 85/100.
Top Port in 2017 (so far): Taylor 2010 LBV
2016 Port of the year: Cockburn 1908

User avatar
JacobH
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2283
Joined: 16:37 Sat 03 May 2008
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: 1992 Delaforce

Post by JacobH » 19:52 Sat 09 Jun 2012

Really deep purple. Opaque. Slightly subdue nose. Some tobacco at the end of the palate. In the mouth, initial hit of sugar. Then deeply tannic and hard work. Very, very good but needs 20+ years.
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest