1985 Martinez

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1985 Martinez

Post by jdaw1 »

In The Bung Hole, on Wednesday 6th June 2012, we said farewell to everybody’s favourite French-Armenian waitress.

Links:
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14902
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1985 Martinez

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Deep red, 80% opaque; appearing to be in the early stages of maturity. Smelly on the nose, dirty - perhaps with some bottle stink or VA. Smells of bruised cherries. Dry entry, with the fruit hidden but the wine is very sharp and sour with too much acidity. Work and air does release some red cherry fruit and it is the fruit that dominates the long finish. This is a disjointed bottle that has not shown the wine at its best. 81/100. 11 hour decant.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Martinez

Post by jdaw1 »

Mz85, brought by DRT, decanted 8am. Red, 70% opaque. My first glass had bottle stink, repaired with a fresh glass. Then the nose had red and black cherries. Big size on entry, with plum, but mid- and late-palate wrong, rough and bitter. We thought a partly damaged bottle.
Post Reply