1983 Cockburn

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply

User avatar
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20401
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London

Re: 1983 Cockburn

Post by jdaw1 » 14:44 Thu 28 Nov 2013

[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=66926#p66926]Here[/url] idj123 wrote:Houston, we have a problem! Just tried to open and decant the G70 before going into work and no purchase-the seal seemed intact but the cork's obviously dropped into the wine. Bit of bottle stink and so I'm taking no chances and switching to a Ck70, if that's ok-although not much time to stand it beforehand? Appreciate that this will likely mess up the placemats-sorry!

So the juice that was in the Dalva bottle, and that was on the Graham circle, was actually Cockburn. How could that be confusing?

Also, amazingly, not corked. Though I failed to note anything more than that. :oops:

User avatar
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8153
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Belfast

Re: 1983 Cockburn

Post by djewesbury » 21:36 Sun 01 Dec 2013

Deep brown, 40%. Sharp nose. Very bitter. I did not like.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...

User avatar
Quinta do Noval Nacional 1962
Posts: 11760
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1983 Cockburn

Post by AHB » 21:59 Thu 12 Dec 2013

Red-brown at the core, 70% opaque. Limited showing on the nose, a little rhubarb sweetened with brown sugar. Cleaner entry, quite high acidity bringing elegant mid-palate fruit that fills the mouth. Lots of dry tanning bringing a nice structure. Lively and fragrant on the mid-palate, lovely cedarwood sawdust mixed in with the soft and sweet fruit. The aftertaste is of sweet fruit, long and lingering. Mace and cloves show on the aftertaste before a long finish of great length. 87/100.
Top Port in 2017 (so far): Graham Stone Terraces 2015 and Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
2016 Port of the year: Cockburn 1908

Post Reply