1983 Feuerheerd

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1983 Feuerheerd

Post by jdaw1 »

Image
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23628
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1983 Feuerheerd

Post by jdaw1 »

Fd83. Red, 40% opaque. Nose had wood and citrus. Acidic freshness in the mouth, but not complicated. Pleasantly drinkable, but not great.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 1983 Feuerheerd

Post by djewesbury »

Deepish brown, cloudy. Not a lovely nose: sharp and musty (that word could be minty, but I don't think I'd have been complaining about that, so I'll go with musty). In the mouth, very juicy, but quite sharp again, and unimpressive.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14906
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1983 Feuerheerd

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Brick red, 40% opaque. Wood ash on the nose, with sweet redcurrants and some dried sage—pleasant, interesting and attractive. Sweet on the palate, with lovely dried fruit—raisins and dried cranberries. Wonderful texture and flavour. Some gentle tannins remain in the wine, ripe and balanced by the fruit. The sage on the nose is also in the palate, giving a gentle aromatic bite to a tremendous palate. Gentle mace shows on the aftertaste and is followed by a great length. Very fine port right in its peak drinking zone. 94/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
Post Reply