1963 Avery

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1963 Avery

Post by jdaw1 »

To celebrate the Quinquagenary of AHB, he arranged a horizontal of 1963s in Wokingham at The Cantley House Hotel (evenings of Friday 11th and Saturday 12th October 2013) and The Walter Arms (lunch on Saturday 12th), and two evening Champagne tastings for our better halves. Sadly the venue was not able to accommodate all he would have liked to have invited. Diaries had been blocked since early 2012, and bottles had been gathered for most of a decade before that. A splendid weekend indeed.

Partial links:
Review of the event as a whole, which starts with a full set of links;
Placemats (and parameters by which constructed).
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by jdaw1 »

Image
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by jdaw1 »

Image
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by jdaw1 »

Some links:
Review which includes links to the Champagnes; Placemats and their Parameters;
• Fri evening 1963s: VS QH GC Ck G | Kh Mg Av F | RV Rs S Dl Cn;
• Sat aftern’n 1963s: Sb RVi RCV Ad RO | Dm BBR T Cr Ni | Mk Fd O Mz;
• Sat evening 1963s: MC W D N NN | A B&I Df PS Cv | GB CáF B Fr;
• Others: 1863 Burmester, 1977 Warre (tappitt hen), Martinez Crusted bottled 1973, 1966 Château Batailley (magnum).
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by jdaw1 »

Av63. Dark red, 40% opaque. Big fruit at start, and string acidity, which fades, leaving some of the fruit. Later still showing the excess mid-palate acidity.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by DRT »

Dark colour. Very sweet entry - initially thick but fades and thins quickly. Lots of unresolved tannin. Finish quite short.

I recall thinking that this port promised far more than it delivered.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

1963 Avery

Post by djewesbury »

jdaw1 wrote:Av63 string acidity
the worst kind.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3518
Joined: 23:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by uncle tom »

Noticeably sweet, lasting well.
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3028
Joined: 22:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by Andy Velebil »

1963 Avery Vintage Port
The cork gave no indication of where this came from. Still has good color for its age. Still some fruit and tannins left on the palate. However, the tannins are holding better than the fruit which is worrisome at this age. Compared to the Morgan VP, this was lacking some complexity and character but still a solid bottle.
90 Points
User avatar
WS1
Cruz 1989
Posts: 1058
Joined: 23:08 Wed 04 Feb 2009
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by WS1 »

dark, browinsih, ruby red and a slightly greenish rim; fresh nose; slight mint in taste; very long; it was revealed that this is supposed to be a lighter version of the Fonseca, potentially the young wines; brilliant stuff.
Not sure what really the Avery 1963 vintage port consist of. John Avery probaly took the secret into his grave.
"Sometimes too much to drink is barely enough"
Mark Twain
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14880
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Mid-red in colour, good depth being about 40% opaque. Gentle and attractive nose of pleasant strawberry jelly. Lovely elegance and texture on the palate. Perfumed fruit, with multiple flavours appearing and changing on the palate, supported by surprisingly robust tannins on the late palate. Gorgeous elegance, with a very long licorice root finish that is just full of fruit. A really fine port. 93/100. Drunk 11-Oct-13. Decanted 6½ hours.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by RAYC »

WS1 wrote: Not sure what really the Avery 1963 vintage port consist of. John Avery probaly took the secret into his grave.
From a second hand source, which contains enough detail to make it credible (and is consistent with what Broadbent has to say on the wine):
[url=http://vinoremus.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/formal-hall_05.html]here[/url], someone wrote:Update from Avery's Wine. In 1963 Avery's made six pipes of their Special Reserve Vintage Port which was blended from 1 pipe of Taylors, 2 pipes of Fonseca and 3 pipes of Sandeman. Apparently this blend was subsequently very highly rated by various wine writers and critics. Quite right too, I might add. Many thanks to Duncan Pilbeam of Avery's for the information.
Rob C.
User avatar
Chris Doty
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 843
Joined: 12:30 Fri 29 Jan 2010

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by Chris Doty »

Thanks RAYC - that's fascinating info.

The 63Avery was my wine of the weekend, IIRC. I was very impressed, and felt that this went toe-to-toe against the Fonseca, with more...flair, somehow. More resolve. At some point I got it confused with the Adams, but I think I have the straight now.

Farr had been offering a case of this wine for <$100 per. That is now gone, :piginpoo: , but I have left in their stock a remaining 9 bottles. If they're still for sale this time next week, I will clear those away as well.

woo woo woo
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by RAYC »

Chris Doty wrote:Farr had been offering a case of this wine for <$100 per. That is now gone, ,
To my knowledge, members of this board have been responsible for the disappearance of at least 33 of those bottles!
Rob C.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by jdaw1 »

Before the technical problem necessitating a restore of :tpf: from a recent backup…
gerwin.degraaf wrote:
RAYC wrote:
WS1 wrote: Not sure what really the Avery 1963 vintage port consist of. John Avery probaly took the secret into his grave.
From a second hand source, which contains enough detail to make it credible (and is consistent with what Broadbent has to say on the wine):
[url=http://vinoremus.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/formal-hall_05.html]here[/url], someone wrote:Update from Avery's Wine. In 1963 Avery's made six pipes of their Special Reserve Vintage Port which was blended from 1 pipe of Taylors, 2 pipes of Fonseca and 3 pipes of Sandeman. Apparently this blend was subsequently very highly rated by various wine writers and critics. Quite right too, I might add. Many thanks to Duncan Pilbeam of Avery's for the information.
Sounds great :D .
I just bought a case of these (awaiting delivery somewhere next week I expect), all of which seem to have very good to excellent levels! :nirvana: I can hardly wait to get one of these in my decanter (after letting the bottles get settled for some time to recover from the trip of course).
User avatar
gerwin.degraaf
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 169
Joined: 20:59 Thu 02 Jul 2009
Location: The Netherlands

Re: 1963 Avery

Post by gerwin.degraaf »

RAYC wrote:
Chris Doty wrote:Farr had been offering a case of this wine for <$100 per. That is now gone, ,
To my knowledge, members of this board have been responsible for the disappearance of at least 33 of those bottles!
I have a case of these on the way over at this moment (seems I was just in time to get them) 88)
Post Reply