1966 Sandeman

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply

User avatar
flash_uk
Dow 1980
Posts: 2747
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1966 Sandeman

Post by flash_uk » 10:59 Wed 23 Apr 2014

30% opacity, red brown, good legs. Slight hospital smell! Mint would be kind, more like antiseptic. Good structure, gentle entry, aniseed, fennel, some very mild heat towards the finish. Better than the nose suggested.

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20534
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1966 Sandeman

Post by jdaw1 » 15:58 Fri 02 May 2014

S66. Lovely red, 50% opaque. Bitterness in nose. Palate bitter, good length, and mid weight.

User avatar
AHB
Quinta do Noval Nacional 1962
Posts: 11915
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1966 Sandeman

Post by AHB » 21:54 Fri 23 May 2014

50% opaque, rose red in colour and very attractive appearance. Slightly harsh on the nose with generous but sour fruit. Floral and fragrant on entry; on the lighter side of medium-bodied. Very floral and elegant with wonderful balance and lots of the flower perfume components. Despite this, the overall impression is of a lightweight and fairly simple palate. Light aftertaste, mostly of brown bruised apples but does have an impressive length of finish. 85/100. Decanted 5½ hours.
Top Ports in 2018 (so far): Niepoort VV (1960's Bottling), Quinta do Noval Nacional 1994 and San Leonardo Very Old White (Bottled 2018)
2017 Ports of the year: Fonseca 1927 and Quinta do Noval 1927

User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8154
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: 1966 Sandeman

Post by djewesbury » 16:09 Sun 08 Jun 2014

A light ruby. This was very, very light on the nose, with light varnish. Dry and spicy in the mouth, with cinnamon, very tannic (relatively). Finishes very quickly (I didn't get the 'great length' mentioned by others) but leaves a light dryness.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...

Post Reply