1931 Quinta do Noval Nacional

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

1931 Quinta do Noval Nacional

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

English bottled by Justerini & Brooks; purchased via auction from a notable collector. Slightly deeper colour than the regular '31 vintage tasted alongside it but otherwise an identical dark brown centre with orange rim. On lifting this to my nose I felt my heart sink. The nose was dominated by thick, black treacle and cabbage soup. I have smelt similar in other wines and have always put this down to bottle stink - which has blown off after a few hours but we didn't have a few hours. What a disappointment. Little immediate flavour on entry, but a thick and lovely texture. The mid-palate brings the bottle stink flavours, but behind these are leather, roasted meat and a touch of heat. The aftertaste glides in slowly , building on a gentle structure of fruit. What a shame about the bottle stink that started to fade by the time we left but was still the dominant feature. This caused me to mark the wine much lower than it might have achieved, but I couldn't really get past it. Shame. 7/7 on Tom's scale or 90/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
EricD
Fonseca Bin 27
Posts: 72
Joined: 04:05 Mon 10 Dec 2007
Location: West New York, NJ

Post by EricD »

The Horror! The Horror! But hey, at least you had the opportunity to try it, right?
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Post by DRT »

Alex,

Please tell me this is the same disappointing bottle you had in mid 2007? I can't imagine how distressed you would be if this has happened to you twice :shock:

Derek
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Conky
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1770
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007

Post by Conky »

Does anyone have a good idea how many of these bottles still exist?
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Post by DRT »

Less than 2999 on the basis that they only produce 250 cases(ish) and we know Alex has had one bottle :wink:
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Derek T. wrote:Please tell me this is the same disappointing bottle you had in mid 2007? I can't imagine how distressed you would be if this has happened to you twice
This was the bottle I tasted in March 2007 - I just posted the tasting note so that we could extend the run of Nacional vintages on the TN index.

It's only happened to me once, I've only tasted the Nacional 1931 once!

Alex
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
Overtired and emotional
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 152
Joined: 14:19 Sun 14 Oct 2007
Location: Bolton England

Post by Overtired and emotional »

This post illustrates a terrible dilemma. How long do you keep a 'trophy wine' (forgive the vulgarity) or spend on one, knowing that the odds must be against it having retained the qualities it had in its prime?

My wife thinks this about me, I believe.
It may be drivel, but it's not meaningless.
User avatar
Axel P
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2027
Joined: 08:09 Wed 12 Sep 2007
Location: Langenfeld, near Cologne, Germany
Contact:

Post by Axel P »

Alex,

I can only stress your TNs as they were very close to my own ones that night. The 31 regular Noval VP was my winner of that event, very closely followed by the 63 Nacional.

This experience however showed me, that you shouldnt always go by the label...

Axel
worldofport.com
o-port-unidade.com
Post Reply