Cask 33

Anything to do with Port.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

I've just received the email about the launch of Sandeman's 'Scion' / 'Ne Oublie' offering, Cask 33. I watched the promo video. How surprised I was to see Luis and George quaffing from the cask using an IVDP square-stemmed glass! They didn't even open the Riedels, for a wine as special as this! They drank this ambrosia out of the same notched glassware that is currently holding the last drops of my bottle of G20YO! Takes all sorts.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by jdaw1 »

An appalling sequence of visual clichés, made as for a long TV ad, but deeply ill-considered for the lean-forward click-away web. And the tinkle-tinkle music didn’t help.

The brief tasting notes contained a semblance of actual information, and believable. Hurray! — I approve of that. (Though why they included George’s indifferent shake of the upper body I don’t know.)

The “591 left” was an unusual touch.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

jdaw1 wrote:An appalling sequence of visual clichés, made as for a long TV ad, but deeply ill-considered for the lean-forward click-away web. And the tinkle-tinkle music didn’t help.
I was also unimpressed and thought the way they spelled out quite so literally the words 'exclusivity' and 'collection' undermined the intended cachet of the thing.
jdaw1 wrote:The brief tasting notes contained a semblance of actual information, and believable. Hurray! — I approve of that. (Though why they included George’s indifferent shake of the upper body I don’t know.)
I thought he glugged it rather. He certainly didn't seem interested in savouring it. But maybe this is why:
jdaw1 wrote:The “591 left” was an unusual touch.
He's got a lot of it to get through. Check back daily to watch the numbers click down. Or not. Oops.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by jdaw1 »

djewesbury wrote:the way they spelled out quite so literally the words 'exclusivity' and 'collection' undermined the intended cachet of the thing.
Agreed.
djewesbury wrote:He's got a lot of it to get through. Check back daily to watch the numbers click down. Or not. Oops.
The numbers don’t have to be correlated with sales.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

That would be a mite disingenuous, no?
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by jdaw1 »

But the TN seemed good: I’d like to taste it.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

If we haven't offended George too much, that would be nice!
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23613
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by jdaw1 »

Maybe it’s all quite cunning. Maybe we were being tricked into thinking that corporate slaves were compelled to make the video, but — perhaps to spite their masters — they chose really good juice as the subject. It tricked me.
PhilW
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3503
Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: Cask 33

Post by PhilW »

I thought this was a very well made video short. Certainly unhurried (like the process of maturation) but I didn't find it dragging. Classic imagery - I would excuse the clichés - and I didn't find the music intrusive or offensive (the part I assume refer to as "tinkle tinkle" I took to be more of a musical clock tick, underpinning the unhurried time-passing/ageing theme. I loved the look of the old bottles. An interesting tasting note, and yes it made me want to try some.

The 'exclusivity' and 'collection' prompts scream "please buy me as a trophy" rather than for drinking; this may be the reality, but a shame not to pitch purely on its merits of taste. That said, part of me at least admires their honesty in this regard, while cringing to think how many bottles sold as trophies may not fulfil their destiny of being well appreciated when drunk.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14879
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Cask 33

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

PhilW wrote:...while cringing to think how many bottles sold as trophies may not fulfil their destiny of being well appreciated when drunk.
And possibly worse, the conditions these trophies might be stored in while not being drunk!
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Cask 33

Post by LGTrotter »

AHB wrote:
PhilW wrote:...while cringing to think how many bottles sold as trophies may not fulfil their destiny of being well appreciated when drunk.
And possibly worse, the conditions these trophies might be stored in while not being drunk!
Quite, I can picture the illuminated shelf in a warm room.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4172
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Cask 33

Post by Glenn E. »

LGTrotter wrote:
AHB wrote:
PhilW wrote:...while cringing to think how many bottles sold as trophies may not fulfil their destiny of being well appreciated when drunk.
And possibly worse, the conditions these trophies might be stored in while not being drunk!
Quite, I can picture the illuminated shelf in a warm room.
On the mantel, of course.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: Cask 33

Post by RAYC »

Now on sale at £500ib at BBR.
Rob C.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

That's a relatively low price point compared to some other recent releases. I would expect it to sell fairly well at that price.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Cask 33

Post by LGTrotter »

djewesbury wrote:That's a relatively low price point compared to some other recent releases. I would expect it to sell fairly well at that price.
Now all is lost. When a man with the good sense of Daniel starts saying £500 a bottle for a wine from the sixties is a low price point then...

Need I go on?

This is not a low price point this is about as far as you can wring a long suffering public with a glitzy box. Daniel; take a long hard look at yourself in the mirror.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by DRT »

I observe that Daniel carefully used the word "relatively" to give his comment some context.

£500 for a bottle in a nice box is not cheap, but it is materially lower than £4,000.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

DRT wrote:I observe that Daniel carefully used the word "relatively" to give his comment some context.

£500 for a bottle in a nice box is not cheap, but it is materially lower than £4,000.
Precisely. I'm not in a hurry to buy some, but maybe someone will bring one to a tasting one day!
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Cask 33

Post by LGTrotter »

But relative to say the Taylor 1964 single harvest tawny at £120ish, or indeed the Krohn bottlings that nearly got to £100 for a tawny from the sixties? But I may have misread the blurb on this wine and 'laid down in 1963' is not the actual vintage.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

Yes, it's more expensive than these.
You're clearly getting the hang of relativity.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Cask 33

Post by LGTrotter »

It depends to what you are relating this £500. Compared to £2500/£4000 then yes it is cheaper. But those are 19th century wines. The cachet on wines of this age has always meant that they get disproportionately dearer. What is new is such a huge mark up on a vintage which is still reasonably common and directly comparable wines are available for a quarter of the price. And that is Taylor, a wine which was fairly substantially marked up once they bought all the Krohn stocks. I do not dispute that people may and can shred as many tenners as they wish in pursuit of this wine. But it is not, relative to it's peers, good value. Unless like small children at Christmas you prize the box more than the contents, for it is a nice box.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4172
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Cask 33

Post by Glenn E. »

LGTrotter wrote:for it is a nice box.
Purrrrrhaps LGTrotter is not the animal we think he is.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by DRT »

I think Daniel quite clearly was relating the price of this to the price of recent releases from other producers. His was not a statement about the value of such wines, merely an accurate comment that this incarnation of the "oh, look what we have found in a cask" phenomenon is much less exorbitantly expensive than other shippers have decided to pitch.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4172
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Cask 33

Post by Glenn E. »

DRT wrote:I think Daniel quite clearly was relating the price of this to the price of recent releases from other producers. His was not a statement about the value of such wines, merely an accurate comment that this incarnation of the "oh, look what we have found in a cask" phenomenon is much less exorbitantly expensive than other shippers have decided to pitch.
And I think that what Owen is saying is that "oh, look what we have found in a cask" is a tad difficult to believe when the wine is from the 1960s as opposed to the 1860s.

It may be cynical of me, but I feel like what Sandeman discovered is a bandwagon, not a Port.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8165
Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cask 33

Post by djewesbury »

Glenn E. wrote:
DRT wrote:I think Daniel quite clearly was relating the price of this to the price of recent releases from other producers. His was not a statement about the value of such wines, merely an accurate comment that this incarnation of the "oh, look what we have found in a cask" phenomenon is much less exorbitantly expensive than other shippers have decided to pitch.
And I think that what Owen is saying is that "oh, look what we have found in a cask" is a tad difficult to believe when the wine is from the 1960s as opposed to the 1860s.

It may be cynical of me, but I feel like what Sandeman discovered is a bandwagon, not a Port.
Glenn! Such cynicism in one so young!
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Cask 33

Post by LGTrotter »

The other comparison is with the Graham 1952 single barrel thing which I think was about £250 a bottle. The box was oak and had a hinge. They did gallon bottles that I thought would be nice to have about the place, but as they were about £1800 I resisted the urge.
Post Reply