2003 Fonseca

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Quinta do Noval Nacional 1962
Posts: 11722
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

2003 Fonseca

Post by AHB » 22:11 Wed 07 Jan 2015

Deep red in colour, still opaque. A wonderful nose of rich and ripe port, really delicious. Silky, satin texture which gently sidles on to the palate with the fruit and tannins fighting for supremacy. Eventually the tannins win - but only just! A massive aftertaste, chewy and tasty. A really great port. 95/100.

The review thread contains a list of all the ports on show at the 2014 Berry Brothers Port Walk.
Top Port in 2017 (so far): Graham Stone Terraces 2015 and Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
2016 Port of the year: Cockburn 1908

Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3699
Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: 2003 Fonseca

Post by LGTrotter » 02:05 Thu 08 Jan 2015

Sweeter and cleaner in taste than the Taylor 03, a lovely blossoming finish to the palate. I would give this the nod over the Taylor but not by much. It has a sharper personality and good clean lines. Still very young and a bit numbing.

User avatar
Dow 1980
Posts: 2609
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 2003 Fonseca

Post by flash_uk » 15:58 Thu 08 Jan 2015

As with the T03, 80% opacity, dark red to purple. Nose muted, some fruit. In the mouth, fruit, acidity, tannin - all there. Lots of tannin in fact. And a cherry, chocolate tinge. Long way to go for this one to ripen.

User avatar
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1112
Joined: 20:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: 2003 Fonseca

Post by AW77 » 00:12 Thu 15 Jan 2015

in the nose pepper and eucalyptus, a more full body than the 2003 Taylor, pepper and acidity in the mouth, not as tannic as the 2003 Taylor, I liked the Fonseca better than the Taylor
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port

Post Reply