
Porto Valriz: ‘Vr’ or ‘Vz’?
Fine by me.
In works better than any of those alternatives.
No. Consonants give gravitas and structure. Only vowels only when really necessary.Doggett wrote:Io?
As you say: no VP, no need. Do suggest — though it’s too late to go in the canonical list in The Book.
If M&S is to be as long as three big characters, why not “M&S” (which has precedent)?
What is or was the relationship between BN and Tp (if a stand-alone abbreviation, my preference)?
Fg is too near FG. So Fm seems natural, though I could live with Fl.
Lp fits the general preference for hard consonants, and is available.
Hadn't realised that "&" was in use. M&S would be fine I think.
George Thienpont. Also, a purchase by Gerwin. And by Axel. Perhaps this is simply BN70 bottled by Thienpont, in which case not meriting an abbreviation?
Bottler, so this is BN.flash_uk wrote: ↑08:24 Fri 31 Jan 2020George Thienpont. Also, a purchase by Gerwin. And by Axel. Perhaps this is simply BN70 bottled by Thienpont, in which case not meriting an abbreviation?
Disagree. That same argument would invalidate our use of BBR for their buyer's own brand ("Berry's Own Selection" as opposed to other BBR-bottled wines which identify the producer). The Thienpont label does not list the producer, so this is a buyer's own brand of Thienpont (see Axel's label, with only the cork revealing it to be BN). Tp.jdaw1 wrote: ↑08:56 Fri 31 Jan 2020Bottler, so this is BN.flash_uk wrote: ↑08:24 Fri 31 Jan 2020George Thienpont. Also, a purchase by Gerwin. And by Axel. Perhaps this is simply BN70 bottled by Thienpont, in which case not meriting an abbreviation?
Am less keen on use of & (we normally drop it elsewhere e.g. BB&R, W&S etc).
Agree Fm is more natural; but if anyone ever brings an "F. Martins" port along (not currently listed in abbreviations either), we won't want to use FM at that stage. I suggest adding both FM for "F. Martins" and therefore Fl for Flagman.
There is a grey region here. There are distinguishing qualities (BBR Ports supplied by, but not necessarily same blend as), but even that is not necessarily always true.PhilW wrote: ↑09:29 Fri 31 Jan 2020Disagree. That same argument would invalidate our use of BBR for their buyer's own brand ("Berry's Own Selection" as opposed to other BBR-bottled wines which identify the producer). The Thienpont label does not list the producer, so this is a buyer's own brand of Thienpont (see Axel's label, with only the cork revealing it to be BN). Tp.
I looked at my list of BOBs, and have to admit that I don't know how many may/not be the same or different to suppliers' blends. I suspect they are the same in many cases, but cannot be sure. Also there are several for which I know of only one vintage sold under their own name (which doesn't mean there are not others, just that I'm not aware of them) such as Hedges and Butler - well known bottler for many producers, but I'm only aware of their own brand in '35 (which was Taylor).
I'd be more inclined to VD or VDM.jdaw1 wrote: ↑22:02 Sun 08 Mar 2020 It seems that we lack an abbreviation for Quinta Vale Dona Maria. Any objection to ‘DM’? (Separately, www.quintavaledonamaria.com seems to be not working.)
(Cross link: relevant in the Y2K tasting of 17 March 2020.)
Yes given Julian’s observation about Vesuvio, VDM would be better as it uses all the letters of the shipper, and it’s more unlikely a Vesuvio off-shoot will appear with initials DM than with D.
Agreed and done.
Beat me to it. Yes, VM is Quinta do Vale Meao not Vesuvio Malvedos.PhilW wrote: ↑12:45 Mon 09 Mar 2020 I'd agree with VDM as most obvious choice, and to my mind no more confusing with potential Vesuvio single quinta as Gould Campbell GC is with potential new Graham's single quinta (i.e. we already cope with this issue). Do we not already have VM for Quinta do Vale Meao anyway?
Alpha by abbreviation, though I wasn't intending to change the approach - should I revert?jdaw1 wrote:Alpha by abbreviation, or by dominant word in name? Perhaps I wasn't consistent: what is new guidance?
Burmester Quinta do Arnozelo needs an abbreviation. BA? BAz? Any opinions?
Agree, BA. Of course, there is also FrA1870 which is also Arnozello [two Ls], a single quinta vp release in 1870 - which we should of course be drinking this year; sadly my last case ran out never ago.Glenn E. wrote: ↑21:24 Tue 05 May 2020 Past practice seems to lead to BA, as we only rarely use more than 1 character except for disambiguation. Does Burmester have another Quinta that might need disambiguation from (A)rnozelo? Even if so, past practice seems to lead to first come first served, with only subsequent examples providing necessary disambiguation.
I say BA.
Done.BA = Burmester Quinta do Arnozelo