Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Organise events to meet up and drink Port.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

The function room (which is large enough for 8 to 10 people) at The Bunghole has been booked in my name for 18:15 on Monday 16th January 2012. Booking ‟for six or seven, but some people might drop out, and others might join” made with Ben.

Apparently they ‟have another tasting group much larger than” us, so they ‟have thousands of glasses on the premises”. Even if not literally true, that bodes well.

First post amended to hold details.

Theme is Croft. Who has which vintages within reach?
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by RAYC »

jdaw1 wrote:Theme is Croft.
Is this an executive decision? I am in favour, but do not feel strongly if others have different ideas...

(Alex - speak your piece or hold your peace!)
Rob C.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by DRT »

By strange coincidence a meeting in London has appeared in my diary for the morning of 17th January. Who would have thought that might happen!

I have Croft 1966, 1975 and 2000. I would prefer not to use the 1966 if others have ample supply.

The 1975 is my last bottle that I bought from Tom a few years ago. The batch was apparently liberated from a Lord's cellar (Lichfield and Lucan spring to mind but the latter surely can't be true). The three bottles I have had from that batch have been splendid, in a 1975 sense, and I am happy to chuck my last one in if it is allowed through the door. I am happy to put both 1975 and 2000 on the table if useful.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by RAYC »

What would be an acceptable line-up for 6-8 people?

Doing 60,63,66,70,75,77 would be nice.

Last (and only) Croft 82 I had was superb, but 91 and 03 are the other candidates that seem to get the acclaim, DRT has the 00 to hand, and I would not say no to trying the 09 if a single bottle could be acquired.

I only have one roeda 67, so I'm tempted to withold thaat for a completist or niche event.
Rob C.
User avatar
WS1
Cruz 1989
Posts: 1058
Joined: 23:08 Wed 04 Feb 2009
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by WS1 »

Hi,

I have plenty of Croft 1982 (20£) and also picked up some 09 Croft the other day :wink: . I think both should be included. On the other hand I have only 1 bt of Croft 1960 and would like to keep it for now. Croft 1970 or 1966 can easily come from me :lol: .
With regards to what we open I am fairly relaxed; I only would like to suggest to use a different opening technique if possible (pull the cork 3 hours before decanting) for all ports.

regards

WS1
"Sometimes too much to drink is barely enough"
Mark Twain
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14916
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

jdaw1 wrote:...they ‟have thousands of glasses on the premises”...
If you are close to them, or occasionally visit them, would you be able to take a look at the glasses and check that they are suitable for a port tasting? Otherwise we could end up with a situation similar to the Bowler, when we had hundreds of port thimbles rented in for our tasting.

I have little Croft readily available. I could offer bottles from 2005 (LBV), 2004 (LBV in halves), 1991, 1967 (Roeda) or 1963. I have other vintages either older or in full case lots in bond.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

AHB wrote:If you are close to them, or occasionally visit them, would you be able to take a look at the glasses and check that they are suitable for a port tasting? Otherwise we could end up with a situation similar to the Bowler, when we had hundreds of port thimbles rented in for our tasting.
I forgot to report that part of the conversation. We discussed port thimbles, of which they apparently have none. The Bunghole has wine glasses.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

Inconveniently in Sussex I have one bottle of each of 1963 and 1927.
RAYC wrote:Doing 60,63,66,70,75,77 would be nice.

Last (and only) Croft 82 I had was superb
Depending on how many we are, I’d favour something like 1960, ’63, ’66, ’70, ’75, ’77, ’82.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

AHB wrote:If you are close to them
Maps: The Bunghole; chez moi.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:Depending on how many we are, I’d favour something like 1960, ’63, ’66, ’70, ’75, ’77, ’82.
But what if there are more than just you and I?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:Depending on how many we are, I’d favour something like 1960, ’63, ’66, ’70, ’75, ’77, ’82.
But what if there are more than just you and I?
Magnums, dear fellow, magnums. Then we could easily accomodate four. Even five, if one or two were non-drinking.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4193
Joined: 22:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Early January 2012, Vintage Port, Central London

Post by Glenn E. »

jdaw1 wrote:
RAYC wrote:M77
Mg77, Morgan? Or Ms77, Messias? But ’77 horizontal a good plan.
Martinez?
Glenn Elliott
Christopher
Niepoort LBV
Posts: 288
Joined: 14:24 Thu 17 Jan 2008
Location: London

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by Christopher »

Hi
Can you please add me to this tasting.
Many thanks
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

In the first post jdaw1 wrote:Who has what?
  • DRT: ‟I have Croft 1966, 1975 and 2000. I would prefer not to use the 1966 if others have ample supply.”
  • RAYC: ‟I only have one roeda 67, so I'm tempted to withold thaat for a completist or niche event.”
  • WS: I have plenty of Croft 1982 (20£) and also picked up some 09 Croft the other day . I think both should be included. On the other hand I have only 1 bt of Croft 1960 and would like to keep it for now. Croft 1970 or 1966 can easily come from me”
  • AHB: ‟I have little Croft readily available. I could offer bottles from 2005 (LBV), 2004 (LBV in halves), 1991, 1967 (Roeda) or 1963. I have other vintages either older or in full case lots in bond.”
  • JDAW: ‟I have little Croft readily available. I could offer bottles from 2005 (LBV), 2004 (LBV in halves), 1991, 1967 (Roeda) or 1963. I have other vintages either older or in full case lots in bond.”
Vintages available (pink is a preference to withhold):
  • 1927 (JDAW);
  • 1960 (WS);
  • 1963 (AHB JDAW);
  • 1966 (WS DRT);
  • 1967 Roeda (AHB RAYC);
  • 1970 (WS);
  • 1975 (DRT);
  • 1982 (WS);
  • 1991 (AHB);
  • 2000 (DRT);
  • 2009 (WS).
So for six or seven people we have nine vintages available, these coming from just three people.
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: Early January 2012, Vintage Port, Central London

Post by RAYC »

RAYC wrote:
For Croft, I have 63 (£55) and 66 (£40 i think) and 82 (£35) Croft available.
If Wolfgang is happy to open one of his 66s and 82s, i am happy to retreat to back of line as my stock is more limited. Equally, these bottles were purchased to drink at these types of events, so if we need to spread the cellar burden, they are fully available.
Rob C.
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15779
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by DRT »

jdaw1 wrote:
In the first post jdaw1 wrote:Who has what?
  • DRT: ‟I have Croft 1966, 1975 and 2000. I would prefer not to use the 1966 if others have ample supply.”
  • RAYC: ‟I only have one roeda 67, so I'm tempted to withold thaat for a completist or niche event.”
  • WS: I have plenty of Croft 1982 (20£) and also picked up some 09 Croft the other day . I think both should be included. On the other hand I have only 1 bt of Croft 1960 and would like to keep it for now. Croft 1970 or 1966 can easily come from me”
  • AHB: ‟I have little Croft readily available. I could offer bottles from 2005 (LBV), 2004 (LBV in halves), 1991, 1967 (Roeda) or 1963. I have other vintages either older or in full case lots in bond.”
  • JDAW: ‟I have little Croft readily available. I could offer bottles from 2005 (LBV), 2004 (LBV in halves), 1991, 1967 (Roeda) or 1963. I have other vintages either older or in full case lots in bond.”
I think you will find that!
jdaw1 wrote:Inconveniently in Sussex I have one bottle of each of 1963 and 1927.
It's a pity we don't have a "Quotation Crimes" thread.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

DRT wrote:It's a pity we don't have a "Quotation Crimes" thread.
I apologise for this copy-paste error, which is regretted, and which has been corrected in the first post of the thread.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

CMAG has a 1970 magnum, of which I might adopt a fraction. Do we want a 1970 magnum?

CMAG also has 2000.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14916
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

There may have been a mis-interpretation of my post in which I identified the vintages of Croft that I was offering. I intended to offer a choice of one of the vintages I mentioned as my bottle to bring - not to volunteer to bring all of them! I'm happy to bring the 1963 as the others should be easier to find if we are bitten by the completist bug. (Or if someone wants to swap and adopt a bottle, I'm happy to do that too.)
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

Updated:
In the first post jdaw1 wrote:Who has what?
  • DRT: ‟I have Croft 1966, 1975 and 2000. I would prefer not to use the 1966 if others have ample supply.”
  • RAYC: ‟For Croft, I have 63 (£55) and 66 (£40 i think) and 82 (£35) Croft available. ! I only have one roeda 67, so I'm tempted to withold thaat for a completist or niche event.”
  • WS: I have plenty of Croft 1982 (20£) and also picked up some 09 Croft the other day . I think both should be included. On the other hand I have only 1 bt of Croft 1960 and would like to keep it for now. Croft 1970 or 1966 can easily come from me”
  • AHB: ‟I have little Croft readily available. I could offer bottles from 2005 (LBV), 2004 (LBV in halves), 1991, 1967 (Roeda) or 1963. I have other vintages either older or in full case lots in bond.”
  • JDAW: ‟Inconveniently in Sussex I have one bottle of each of 1963 and 1927.”
Vintages available (pink is a preference to withhold, and semi-pink meaning only one):
  • 1927 (JDAW);
  • 1960 (WS);
  • 1963 (AHB RAYC JDAW);
  • 1966 (WS RAYC DRT);
  • 1967 Roeda (AHB RAYC);
  • 1970 (WS CMAG-magnum);
  • 1975 (DRT);
  • 1982 (WS RAYC);
  • 1991 (AHB);
  • 2000 (DRT CMAG);
  • 2009 (WS).
This is now too complicated. Somebody with complicated preferences please suggest a plan.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14916
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

jdaw1 wrote:Updated:
In the first post jdaw1 wrote:Who has what?
  • DRT: ‟I have Croft 1966, 1975 and 2000. I would prefer not to use the 1966 if others have ample supply.”
  • RAYC: ‟For Croft, I have 63 (£55) and 66 (£40 i think) and 82 (£35) Croft available. ! I only have one roeda 67, so I'm tempted to withold thaat for a completist or niche event.”
  • WS: I have plenty of Croft 1982 (20£) and also picked up some 09 Croft the other day . I think both should be included. On the other hand I have only 1 bt of Croft 1960 and would like to keep it for now. Croft 1970 or 1966 can easily come from me”
  • AHB: ‟I have little Croft readily available. I could offer bottles from 2005 (LBV), 2004 (LBV in halves), 1991, 1967 (Roeda) or 1963. I have other vintages either older or in full case lots in bond.”
  • JDAW: ‟Inconveniently in Sussex I have one bottle of each of 1963 and 1927.”
Vintages available (pink is a preference to withhold, and semi-pink meaning only one):
  • 1927 (JDAW);
  • 1960 (WS);
  • 1963 (AHB RAYC JDAW);
  • 1966 (WS RAYC DRT);
  • 1967 Roeda (AHB RAYC);
  • 1970 (WS CMAG-magnum);
  • 1975 (DRT);
  • 1982 (WS RAYC);
  • 1991 (AHB);
  • 2000 (DRT CMAG);
  • 2009 (WS).
This is now too complicated. Somebody with complicated preferences please suggest a plan.
How is this?
AHB - 1963
WS - 1966
CMAG and JDAW - 1970 (mag)
DRT - 1975
RAYC - 1982
BMHR - tba if attending, but hopeful to contribute a 1960

If we feel the urge to be more completist or are worried about inadequacy of quantity:
Potentially available for adoption:- 2000 from DRT, 2009 from WS, 1991 from AHB, 1977 from London retailers
Last edited by Alex Bridgeman on 18:19 Thu 29 Dec 2011, edited 1 time in total.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2060
Joined: 23:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by RAYC »

Personally I think we should get the 77 - i noticed that both Ancient and Modern and Roberson Wine have some in stock so would be happy to stop by there to pick some up. If WS1 would let us group-adopt his 82 at £20, would that work?

Alternatively my 63 should not be in pink: Alex - let me know if you want to withold your semi-pink.

I wouldn't mind giving the 91 another go if we want to add another bottle or if someone else joins and needs to adopt. I have some in bond that could come out if we decide soon. I would also be interested in trying the 09 if it needed to be expanded yet further!
Rob C.
User avatar
benread
Niepoort 1977
Posts: 1555
Joined: 21:36 Thu 17 Apr 2008
Location: Reigate, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by benread »

Gents,

Being a Monday should make this relatively easy for me but I need to wait until we are back home before I can consult a family calendar and confirm. The same locational challenge also means I am not certain what I can contribute, but I think I have a bottle of Croft 1960, given to me by my father in the last year or so as a Christmas or Birthday present. Assuming the answer to both questions is yes, I think that and a Roeda 1967 are the only contributions I can offer.

Ben
Ben
-------
Vintage 1970 and now proud owner of my first ever 'half-century'!
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14916
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

RAYC wrote:Personally I think we should get the 77 - i noticed that both Ancient and Modern and Roberson Wine have some in stock so would be happy to stop by there to pick some up. If WS1 would let us group-adopt his 82 at £20, would that work?
It would, but may not be necessary given that JDAW is yet to add his bottle to the lineup. We may be able to prevail on him to acquire the 1977 since Ben (if he can join us) might be able to offer the 1960.
RAYC wrote:Alternatively my 63 should not be in pink: Alex - let me know if you want to withold your semi-pink.
No need; I open a number of 1963 ports every year and am happy to make 16th Jan the date of my first for 2012.
RAYC wrote:I wouldn't mind giving the 91 another go if we want to add another bottle or if someone else joins and needs to adopt. I have some in bond that could come out if we decide soon. I would also be interested in trying the 09 if it needed to be expanded yet further!
We have a couple of weeks to decide, let's see how things develop.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23638
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Mon 16 January 2012, The Bunghole

Post by jdaw1 »

AHB wrote:It would, but may not be necessary given that JDAW is yet to add his bottle to the lineup.
jdaw1 wrote:Inconveniently in Sussex I have one bottle of each of 1963 and 1927.
Post Reply