Organise events to meet up and drink Port.
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 02:13 Sun 14 Sep 2014
I will be staying up to watch the results come in, and I have prepared myself an appropriate tasting, comprising of six bottlings from the Scotch Malt Whisky Society's outturn:
If you are also going to be in front of your TV that night, please join me and tell me what you're drinking.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
DRT
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15572
- Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Chesterfield, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DRT » 02:30 Sun 14 Sep 2014
Impressive lineup.
I will be up and watching in my hotel room in London. I will pop down to
my local off-license to pick up an appropriate bottle to see me through the night.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 02:42 Sun 14 Sep 2014
DRT wrote:Impressive lineup.
I will be up and watching in my hotel room in London. I will pop down to
my local off-license to pick up an appropriate bottle to see me through the night.
Excellent. We'll both be really useful come Friday. Hopefully we won't also be in a really foul mood.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
DRT
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15572
- Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Chesterfield, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DRT » 02:46 Sun 14 Sep 2014
djewesbury wrote:DRT wrote:Impressive lineup.
I will be up and watching in my hotel room in London. I will pop down to
my local off-license to pick up an appropriate bottle to see me through the night.
Excellent. We'll both be really useful come Friday. Hopefully we won't also be in a really foul mood.
It's a safe bet. At least 60% "no". I have it on good authority from Rab McGabe.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
PhilW
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
- Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Post
by PhilW » 16:16 Sun 14 Sep 2014
That's quite a selection. I picked up another bottle of the Balvenie Caribbean cask today, since Sainsbury's have it reduced at the moment, so I'll either be celebrating the decision to stay, or toasting all the best for their decision to go forward independently.
-
jdaw1
- Cockburn 1851
- Posts: 22018
- Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
- Location: London
-
Contact:
Post
by jdaw1 » 16:34 Sun 14 Sep 2014
djewesbury wrote:

Is the X to indicate a choice, or a negative choice?
If it is a No, I do hope that post-event surveys show that some voted No because of the vehemence of the Yeses, in particular their harassment of those who disagree.
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 16:37 Sun 14 Sep 2014
The X is primarily a ballot paper mark but it is also, happily, an inverted saltire (albeit one in grey and white). You may know by now which way I lean on this issue (clue: Ian Paisley used to like this word) but how you choose to read the symbology of this placemat is a matter for you as reader to decide.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 16:54 Sun 14 Sep 2014
I also happen to think that Gordon Brown wrote
an excellent piece in yesterday's Grauniad explaining why the UK is the best vehicle that citizens have if they want to be able to direct, or influence, the extra-territorial forces shaping our society today.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
DRT
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15572
- Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Chesterfield, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DRT » 17:23 Sun 14 Sep 2014
jdaw1 wrote:I do hope that post-event surveys show that some voted No because of the vehemence of the Yeses, in particular their harassment of those who disagree.
Indeed. I was in Edinburgh last weekend and was told by a number of people that many of those intending to vote No are keeping silent (or lying) to avoid the venom of those who are of a different view. That is the reason for my confidence in at least a 60/40 victory to No.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 17:29 Sun 14 Sep 2014
DRT wrote:jdaw1 wrote:I do hope that post-event surveys show that some voted No because of the vehemence of the Yeses, in particular their harassment of those who disagree.
Indeed. I was in Edinburgh last weekend and was told by a number of people that many of those intending to vote No are keeping silent (or lying) to avoid the venom of those who are of a different view. That is the reason for my confidence in at least a 60/40 victory to No.
Yes, something about this reminds me of the 2008 US election. Everyone said that it would be too close to call or a McCain victory. Only one analyst, Nate Silver, called it correctly, by looking at the biases of all the polls and studying what all the data from them actually told him. I don't think it'll quite be 60:40 this week but I don't believe either that it's going to be as close as the media continually say it will be. Where is the proper analysis of all this woefully inadequate polling data?
I am delighted to hear that McGabe has today said that he will not call for endless repeated referendums if he loses. (NB: referendums. Not referenda. It's an English word.)
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
PhilW
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
- Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Post
by PhilW » 17:30 Sun 14 Sep 2014
DRT wrote: I was in Edinburgh last weekend and was told by a number of people that many of those intending to vote No are keeping silent (or lying) to avoid the venom of those who are of a different view. That is the reason for my confidence in at least a 60/40 victory to No.
I can certainly believe that many "no" voters are keeping their heads down, primarily because the issue seems to be being treated as if it is a "vote yes if you're proud to be Scottish" by many, perhaps deliberately/divisively, rather than about the independence itself. However, I can see the "proud Scottish yes" vote winning the day (rather than a "yes to independence"), so I am less confident in the result.
-
DRT
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15572
- Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Chesterfield, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DRT » 17:40 Sun 14 Sep 2014
djewesbury wrote:Where is the proper analysis of all this woefully inadequate polling data?
There are some who have diligently analysed the available data and reached a well informed conclusion...

- Screen Shot 2014-09-14 at 17.37.39.png (44.35 KiB) Viewed 14422 times
That is quite a margin in a two horse race. They are seldom wrong.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 17:42 Sun 14 Sep 2014
Crikey!
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
PhilW
- Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
- Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Post
by PhilW » 17:49 Sun 14 Sep 2014
DRT wrote:That is quite a margin in a two horse race. They are seldom wrong.
If they are, do we have to bail them out at tax-payers expense, or is that just for other types of gamblers?

I admit I'm surprised by the margin there.
-
jdaw1
- Cockburn 1851
- Posts: 22018
- Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
- Location: London
-
Contact:
Post
by jdaw1 » 17:54 Sun 14 Sep 2014
DRT wrote:That is quite a margin in a two horse race.
Innumerate rubbish.
Odds of 1/4 and 3/1 imply probabilities of 80% and 25% (the total exceeding 100% by the bookies’ profit). So divide by 1.05 to get implied probabilities of 76% and 24%.
Let’s assume that the Yes and No votes are normally distributed, with a standard deviation of ±5% (this σ having been guessed by me). So if the expected outcome were 53.6% : 46.4%, with that uncertainty, the probability of a Yes would indeed be about 76%. But 53.6% : 46.4% is quite a small margin.
= 50 + 5 * NORMSINV( 1 / (1+(1+1/4)/(1+3)) )
-
DRT
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15572
- Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Chesterfield, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DRT » 18:05 Sun 14 Sep 2014
jdaw1 wrote:DRT wrote:please define standardly distributed.
Normally distributed. It’s not, of course, very little is, but the approximation isn’t going to mislead.
If you want to attack, attack the ±5%.
I certainly don't want to attack you on a calculation. I was simply observing that when bookmakers create such a gulf in odds in a two horse race there is very little probability that the outsider will win and the favourite, in such circumstances, very often wins with ease.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
jdaw1
- Cockburn 1851
- Posts: 22018
- Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
- Location: London
-
Contact:
Post
by jdaw1 » 18:21 Sun 14 Sep 2014
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 18:23 Sun 14 Sep 2014
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
LGTrotter
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
- Location: Somerset, UK
Post
by LGTrotter » 22:14 Sun 14 Sep 2014
PhilW wrote:DRT wrote: I was in Edinburgh last weekend and was told by a number of people that many of those intending to vote No are keeping silent (or lying) to avoid the venom of those who are of a different view. That is the reason for my confidence in at least a 60/40 victory to No.
I can certainly believe that many "no" voters are keeping their heads down, primarily because the issue seems to be being treated as if it is a "vote yes if you're proud to be Scottish" by many, perhaps deliberately/divisively, rather than about the independence itself. However, I can see the "proud Scottish yes" vote winning the day (rather than a "yes to independence"), so I am less confident in the result.
The same issue as the 92 election where people were a little shamefaced about saying to pollsters that they were voting Tory, but they did.
Not being much into spirits I am at a loss what to drink. There are the Scottish port shippers, or at least of Scottish origin.
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 22:21 Sun 14 Sep 2014
Scottish port importers were many and varied but the bottles are fairly rare now. Shippers gives you obvious choices though; even Taylor and Croft could be said to have Scottish links via various different Robertsons.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
DRT
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15572
- Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Chesterfield, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DRT » 22:29 Sun 14 Sep 2014
djewesbury wrote:Scottish port importers were many and varied but the bottles are fairly rare now. Shippers gives you obvious choices though; even Taylor and Croft could be said to have Scottish links via various different Robertsons.
Anything currently made by the Symingtons would do.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
AW77
- Morgan 1991
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: 20:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Post
by AW77 » 22:43 Sun 14 Sep 2014
Sandeman's (I hope the apostrophe is correct in this case) has Scottish roots as well. So you could even have a Sherry (or stick to port).
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
-
LGTrotter
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
- Location: Somerset, UK
Post
by LGTrotter » 22:47 Sun 14 Sep 2014
And does anyone know when the result will be declared? Not sure where exit polls fit into this one either, if there are we could still all get an early night.
-
djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Belfast
-
Contact:
Post
by djewesbury » 22:50 Sun 14 Sep 2014
LGTrotter wrote:And does anyone know when the result will be declared? Not sure where exit polls fit into this one either, if there are we could still all get an early night.
The count will begin as with a general election, almost immediately, but depending on the maths there could be no result until 7 am. And I'd be very wary of exit polls.
Daniel J.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
DRT
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15572
- Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Chesterfield, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by DRT » 22:52 Sun 14 Sep 2014
I suspect we will know in roughly the same timescales as a general election. The Highlands and Islands could drag into Friday but there is no one there so that doesn't matter.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn