1997 Smith Woodhouse

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15922
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1997 Smith Woodhouse

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Deep red colour, starting to develop a brick tone with an opaque centre and a medium rim. Slightly stewed red fruit on the nose, but attractive despite the slight stewiness. Nice texture on the palate with poise and fine combination of fruit and soft, ripe tannins. A little lighter-bodied than the main Symington labels but finishes with a lovely sour cherry and dark chocolate finish. Very enjoyable drinking. 89/100.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
rich_n
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 766
Joined: 09:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: 1997 Smith Woodhouse

Post by rich_n »

Muted nose. Can't find much at all there. Better on the palate. Red fruits and a tonne of tannins. Orange peel acidity late. A decent finish.
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1997 Smith Woodhouse

Post by winesecretary »

Dark. Quite good. Bit one-note.
User avatar
flash_uk
Cálem Quinta da Foz 1970
Posts: 4659
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1997 Smith Woodhouse

Post by flash_uk »

70% opacity, deep dark red, slightly cloudy. Lively red fruit and violets on the nose. Full, dryness, soft tannin, lovely rich red fruit.
Post Reply