1994 Martinez

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23733
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1994 Martinez

Post by jdaw1 »

jdaw1 wrote: 01:18 Tue 26 Mar 2024
Alex Bridgeman wrote: 20:17 Mon 25 Mar 2024I just hate 1990s corks. Bloody Fonseca cork exploded into tiny fragments, even after being loosened with the JDAW cork impeller.
Ditto my Warre cork, but Martinez and Noval came clean. All three opened 23:30.


Edit: N, W, Mz — all decanted 07:45.
Mz94, opened 23:30 the night before, decanted 07:45: dark dark red, 80% opaque. Mid-weight, big maraschino cherries, and a crisp bitterness throughout. Liked. Good of itself, and adjusted for modern reputation of house, very good.
User avatar
nac
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1876
Joined: 14:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: 1994 Martinez

Post by nac »

Quite pale - <50%. Something not quite right on the nose. Palate was better. Tastes much older than it is - maybe stored too hot at some point. OK. 4/7
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14995
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1994 Martinez

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Opened 23.30, double decanted 07.45, tasted 17.50.

Paler than most of the wines at this tasting at 70% opacity, but attractive appearance nevertheless. Bright and fresh on an extremely attractive nose. Gentle and fragrant strawberry on the palate, beautifully framed with gentle tannins and elegant acidity. Sparkling (figuratively rather than literally) but slightly sweet aftertaste. Long and slightly sticky redcurrant aftertaste and a decent length on the finish. Delightfully attractive. 92/100.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
Post Reply