jdaw1 wrote:I would like there to be a deep tasting of many vintages of Ramos-Pinto. But the only Ramos-Pinto vintages I have are 1994 and 1931.
Would anybody else want there to be such a tasting? And which vintages do those people own?
I sadly have none but would love to join such a tasting.
Let’s aim for an autumn date. Preferences? How about Tuesday 21st October 2014
That sounds like a plan. If considering other dates, please remember the planned Martinez vertical date is still to be confirmed, but expected in last fortnight of Nov.
I think I have 80, 83 and 94. But would need to have a closer look where they are. Would be interested too in such a vertical since I missed the one Axel did in Germany.
regards
WS1
"Sometimes too much to drink is barely enough" Mark Twain
Thank to Axel’s excellent collection, the list of vintages has grown substantially.
jdaw1 wrote:Vintages:
1924, 650cl (THRA);
1931 (JDAW);
1960 (AP);
1970 (AP);
1980 (THRA, WPS?, AP);
1982 (AP);
1983 (WPS?, AP);
1985 (AP);
1991 (THRA, AP);
1994 (JDAW, WPS?, AP);
1994 Ervamoira (AP);
1997 (AP);
2000 (AP);
2002 (AP);
2003 (AP);
2005 (AP);
2007 (AP);
2007 Ervamoira (AP);
2009 Ervamoira (AP);
2011 (AP).
Is it a good idea to have 1931 and 2011 in the same tasting? Do the very young Ports overwhelm those with some dignified age? Should we restrict ourselves to ≤2000, thereby excluding those from this century? I say yes.
jdaw1 wrote:Is it a good idea to have 1931 and 2011 in the same tasting? Do the very young Ports overwhelm those with some dignified age? Should we restrict ourselves to ≤2000, thereby excluding those from this century? I say yes.
I would go further, and only include <94, or perhaps <=94 (i.e. not including under 21s with oldies).
jdaw1 wrote:Is it a good idea to have 1931 and 2011 in the same tasting? Do the very young Ports overwhelm those with some dignified age? Should we restrict ourselves to ≤2000, thereby excluding those from this century? I say yes.
I would go further, and only include <94, or perhaps <=94 (i.e. not including under 21s with oldies).
I agree. The youngsters always get lost/neglected at these big verticals. Dropping 8 or 9 youngsters from the line-up could provide funds for a couple more oldies.
"The first duty of Port is to be red" Ernest H. Cockburn
I can add nothing to the list of bottles as I have no RP! but this sounds like an excellent idea and a shipper I am not overly familiar with, thus count me in please
Thanks
Tom has confirmed that he meant this size: at 8⅔ bottles, slightly bigger than an Imperial.
Would this rather unbalance the tasting? There’s nothing wrong with each of us having to drink half a litre of a ninety year old port really, nothing wrong but would it fit with the workings of a vertical tasting?
I'm in, but can offer only the 1983 and/or the 1994.
jdaw1 wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
uncle tom wrote:I can only add the '24 (650cL)
Tom has confirmed that he meant this size: at 8⅔ bottles, slightly bigger than an Imperial.
Would this rather unbalance the tasting? There’s nothing wrong with each of us having to drink half a litre of a ninety year old port really, nothing wrong but would it fit with the workings of a vertical tasting?
Part of me says no. But not all of me.
I think it depends on the cost. While I would love to help to drink 6½ litres of 90 year old port it could significantly distort the costs of the tasting. Personally, I would rather spend the same amount of money but taste a smaller amount of the 1924 and more vintages.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
I would like. I can, at present, offer nothing, but perhaps that might change between now and October. Happy to adopt as always.
Honestly, I turn my back for a moment and you've organised an enormous vertical with bumper formats of decently old port.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Tom has confirmed that he meant this size: at 8⅔ bottles, slightly bigger than an Imperial.
Would this rather unbalance the tasting? There’s nothing wrong with each of us having to drink half a litre of a ninety year old port really, nothing wrong but would it fit with the workings of a vertical tasting?
Part of me says no. But not all of me.
I think it depends on the cost. While I would love to help to drink 6½ litres of 90 year old port it could significantly distort the costs of the tasting. Personally, I would rather spend the same amount of money but taste a smaller amount of the 1924 and more vintages.
I get where you are both coming from on this, but at which other event do you think Tom should open this unusual bottle? Cost will obviously be a consideration, but assuming it is palatable (sorry), surely this is a fabulous event to let this very unusual bottle show the world what it has been waiting for?
"The first duty of Port is to be red" Ernest H. Cockburn
Andy Velebil wrote:If the timing works I would fly over for this.
I was thinking the same thing, the problem being that I'll have just returned from the 2014 Port Harvest Tour and can't simply extend my stay for that long.
Depending on the dates, I'd be interested in possibly flying over the pond for this tasting. I can't say that I've had the opportunity to taste Ramos-Pinto in a vertical format. Sounds very interesting! As far as bottles go I have the 1945, 1970, 1983 (750 & mag), 1985, 1994 and 1995. In addition I also have one of their white Colheitas that I could also throw into the mix.
Before the technical problem necessitating a restore of from a recent backup…
mosesbotbol wrote:
Andy Velebil wrote:If the timing works I would fly over for this.
Same here, but I have little to offer for Ramos Pinto vintages outside of '85 and possibly '70. Not really interested in tasting anything under 25 years old.
Axel P wrote:Sure, just had this last week with Joao Nicolau. But before these bottles were offered to me I have never seen those.
I've never seen of them or heard of them before, either.
I'm always looking to expand my very small stock of birth-year VP. Do you know if these are available for sale, or if they're going to be available soon?
• Booked for Tuesday 21st October 2014: the Function room in The Bung Hole (57 High Holborn, London WC1V 6DT, tel +44 20 7831 8365, streetmap.co.uk, maps.google.co.uk). “Tables in and out and 250 glasses”, said the lovely Helen. An updated glass-count estimate will be transmitted a week before the event.
• I will be contacting people soon(ish) to get prices for their bottles, and then allocate who is bringing what.
FYI, Ramos Pinto have asked whether João Nicolau de Almeida should start with a formal presentation, including slides. I have asked not, preferring that the dithyramb come in the middle of the event, after JNdA has tasted the Ports himself, and is much less formal. Presumably he will speak alone.
In an email to Ramos-Pinto ensubjected “Ramos Pinto vertical, Tue 21st Oct 2014: food?”, jdaw1 wrote:Hello again.
The tasting will be in our regular place, The Bung Hole. It helps TBH to know our food order in advance.
We tend to eat the varieties of steak and chips, but you might want different. It would help to be forewarned of the food order, about a week in advance. So as and when João and Ana are willing to look at the menu, please could I be told what they’ll be having.
I’ll resend this email, as a reminder, about a week before the tasting.
Mutatis mutandis, the same applies to you lot.
Also, attendees have PMs on the tawdry subject of money.
Flash: is the background pattern of the first page of the placemats too faint or too dark?
Do you mind me saying that the switch from four digits to two in the Glasses Title looks unwieldy? They are all years beginning 19. Either use four digits in all or two. I understand the logic but I think the introductory 19 is unnecessary in the first circle; the Circlearray contains the full numerical year.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...