Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:12 Sun 12 Oct 2014
I think JDAW wants more info on the Terrier Racing event.
A place for those passionate about port, and for those new to it. We hold lots of Port tastings: please join us!
https://www.theportforum.com/
It's a scorcher. Get a few hundred locals, a cider tent, a betting shed and plenty of assorted dogs. If it rains you have the added spectacle of cars slithering down the field to form little schools, shunting helplessly at each other. I used to go religiously every year but I am more frugal of my pleasures these days.DRT wrote:I think JDAW wants more info on the Terrier Racing event.
I note there was a review of the slim volume by the New York Times in 1981; the brief additional information being that the primary sources used by Cedric Dickens (the author) were "the notebook of recipes, dated 1859, recorded by Georgina Hogarth" and "the catalogue of Dickens's wine cellar at Gads Hill, drawn up for the sale of the house in 1870 after his death" (no date/author provided). The article also makes reference to Cedric sharing "a steaming bowl of bishop, a drink made with Port" with a professor being how the idea for the book came about. Given that this was published 33 years ago and the author was 65 at the time, Cedric Dickens may no longer be in a position to offer access to the sources, but perhaps his progeny might, if wanted?LGTrotter wrote:My information is limited to the book itself. Already ably reviewed on 'Books about Port' site, it is written by the great grandson of the original Dickens. It is slimmish and from a cursory read it has thrown up a number of nuggets. One being the précis of the Gads Hill auction catalogue sold after the death of Dickens which I have posted. There are the usual series of still blindingly marvellous quotes, alongside rather more modern observations by a rather less talented Dickens. He does however have his merits, a solid recipe for negus and smoking bishop are always welcome. He also has some interesting connections and stories, but I doubt they would scintillate most readers. Published in 1980 it has the feel of something from the fifties, or even the thirties. And there is a chapter entitled "The great port controversy"; is that not enough?jdaw1 wrote:Please post more about the secondary source.
Well, there were ports made in 1887...AW77 wrote:In Roald Dahl's "My Uncle Oswald" (in the 2011 Peguin edition on pages 42-43) you can find the following lines:
" ... 'Have a glass of Port, young man', Sir Charles Makepiece said to me, 'and pass it round.' Ipoured myself some port and carefully passed the decanter to my left. 'This is a good bottle. Fonseca '87.' "
As the book was first published in 1979 and the episode where the port was drunk is said to take place in 1912, the '87 is a 1887. But I guess that the vintage was just invented by Dahl, as 1887 is pretty close to the "phylloxera plague" (But Julian might know if there ever was a 1887 Fonseca).
'The great port controversy' concerns the following quote from 'Pickwick Papers':djewesbury wrote:I have online access to the Sunday Times from 1961 but I don't know what you're looking for therein.
EDIT: I have now appended the image that was contained in this post to a post at the (current) end of this thread, so that all the letters are in chronological order.LGTrotter wrote:'The great port controversy' concerns the following quote from 'Pickwick Papers':djewesbury wrote:I have online access to the Sunday Times from 1961 but I don't know what you're looking for therein.
'I'm very sorry he has failed,' said Wilkins Flasher, Esquire. 'Capital dinners he gave.'
'Fine port he had too,' remarked Mr. Simmery. 'We are going to send our butler to the sale to-morrow, to pick up some of that sixty-four.'
The controversy being that port was not being made in 1764. In 'Drinking with Dickens' it is said that this point was argued out through the correspondence page of the 'Sunday Times' in 1961. Alistair Lucas claimed this was another inaccuracy in Pickwick Papers. Warner Allen (he of 'A contemplation of wine' etc) then agreed that port was not produced until 1770. I am not sure who supported Dickens in this but apparently in 1980 eleven men came together in 'Mother Bunches' London to thrash out the truth of the matter.
I think it seems quite possible that port was being made and shipped in 1764.
Isn't "The great port controversy" the leitmotif on The Port Forum?LGTrotter wrote: 'The great port controversy'
Yes, curse him, we'd all be drinking ghastly unfortified muck if he'd had his way.djewesbury wrote:Thank you. I find it amusing that a James Forrester manages to creep into the correspondence.
indeed, but difficult to keep coming up with new ones. How about; 'is there any point in drinking port and not getting drunk? Would you buy a de-alcoholised port?'AW77 wrote:Isn't "The great port controversy" the leitmotif on The Port Forum?LGTrotter wrote: 'The great port controversy'
You must always be intoxicated. It is the key to all: the one question. In order not to feel the horrible burden of Time breaking your back and bending you to the earth, you must become drunk, without truce.
But on what? On wine, poetry or virtue, as you wish. But you must get drunk.
And if at times, on the steps of a palace, or the green grass of a ditch, in the mournful solitude of your room, you awaken, and your intoxication is already diminished or gone, ask the wind, the wave, the star, the bird, the clock, everything that flees, everything that groans, everything that rolls, that sings, that speaks, ask what time it is; and the wind, the wave, the star, the bird, the clock will answer you: "It is time to be drunk! In order not to be the slaves martyred by time, always become intoxicated! On wine, on poetry or on virtue, as you will."
Delivered in cask — IVDP, pay heed! — from the Long Lake.In [i]The Hobbit[/i], John Ronald Reuel Tolkien wrote:When he heard this Bilbo was all in a flutter, for he saw that luck was with him and he had a chance at once to try his desperate plan. He followed the two elves, until they entered a small cellar and sat down at a table on which two large flagons were set. Soon they began to drink and laugh merrily. Luck of an unusual kind was with Bilbo then. It must be potent wine to make a wood-elf drowsy; but this wine, it would seem, was the heady vintage of the great gardens of Dorwinion, not meant for his soldiers or his servants, but for the king's feasts only, and for smaller bowls, not for the butler's great flagons.
Very soon the chief guard nodded his head, then he laid it on the table and fell fast asleep. The butler went on talking and laughing to himself for a while without seeming to notice, but soon his head too nodded to the table, and he fell asleep and snored beside his friend. Then in crept the hobbit. Very soon the chief guard had no keys, but Bilbo was trotting as fast as he could along the passage towards the cells. The great bunch seemed very heavy to his arms, and his heart was often in his mouth, in spite of his ring, for he could not prevent the keys from making every now and then a loud clink and clank, which put him all in a tremble.
Nonsense. It must have been the house-guest, whose mother had a grievance against our hero’s father (probably a dispute in India about a cask of Malmsey).LGTrotter wrote:I bet the mousey niece did it.
LGTrotter wrote:Daniel you really are the shiny silver sixpence in my pudding.
Are you sure you two are on the correct social media site?djewesbury wrote:You two make it all worthwhile.
It is indeed a pleasure to have the old lags back, and of course the newer ones.DRT wrote:LGTrotter wrote:Daniel you really are the shiny silver sixpence in my pudding.Are you sure you two are on the correct social media site?djewesbury wrote:You two make it all worthwhile.
My thoughts exactly. I read it late last night and think I might enjoy being drip fed it. I had heard of the Montague Egg stories before but didn't realise he was a salesman for a wine merchant. I think I might have to invest in the two collections he appears in.Glenn E. wrote:Delightful! I eagerly await the next installment!
Perhaps a convenient trade for the sons of the well-heeled gentlemen who could not quite manage to be lawyers, doctors or commissioned officers to ensure they didn't have to mingle with the great unwashed?LGTrotter wrote:You rarely get public school educated, double-barrellers working in other areas of grocery but it is common when it comes to selling wine. I wonder why?
Yes, what Derek is trying to say it's a convenient dumping ground for the younger sons and their ilk.DRT wrote:Excellent!
Perhaps a convenient trade for the sons of the well-heeled gentlemen who could not quite manage to be lawyers, doctors or commissioned officers to ensure they didn't have to mingle with the great unwashed?LGTrotter wrote:You rarely get public school educated, double-barrellers working in other areas of grocery but it is common when it comes to selling wine. I wonder why?
Perhaps those with well-off parents are both more likely to attend a public school, and to have had more experience of fine wine and hence cultivated an interest while young?LGTrotter wrote:I may have made this point before but I always wonder about the kind of people who work in wine merchants. You rarely get public school educated, double-barrellers working in other areas of grocery but it is common when it comes to selling wine. I wonder why?
+1 (thank you, Daniel)Glenn E. wrote:Delightful! I eagerly await the next installment!
It is exciting isn't it! And I know how it ends!!DRT wrote:I am enjoying this, but it is difficult trying to not hear the "Dum, dum, da-da-dum..." from Eastenders at the end of each installment
{like}LGTrotter wrote:
+1DRT wrote:{like}LGTrotter wrote:
It is, except for the lack of new page for me to read this morning; I want my fix!djewesbury wrote:This is working so well!!
Perhaps JDAW could add this functionality to the tasting mat software.djewesbury wrote:There should really be a TPF scheduling app that would automate the posting of the remaining pages for me.