Re: Bordeaux Recommendations
Posted: 15:15 Sat 07 Jun 2014
Is that a Wine Society label?
A place for those passionate about port, and for those new to it. We hold lots of Port tastings: please join us!
https://www.theportforum.com/
A&N...jdaw1 wrote:Is that a Wine Society label?
Pas de tout Derek, the 1970 is one vintage that I would endorse wholeheartedly. Even the lower depths have at least tasted like they might have been decent wine once upon a time. And Army and Navy have got a good press on this forum for their port bottlings at least. As you say, what could possibly go wrong?DRT wrote:Sorry, Owen, I had submitted my bid before you told me to stop and am now the proud owner of these beauties...
That is a much more special bottle than any of my 1970s, all of which have been bought recently on BidForWine.com at between £15-£25 per bottle and are used as house claret.djewesbury wrote:Should I drink my lone bottle of Léoville Las Cases 1970 with the bone-in shin of beef that I'm going to cook for several hours tomorrow? Is there a 'drink up' theme that I'm detecting here?
Excellent. It's claret weekend!DRT wrote:Tonight is my night off so I have opened a bottle of Château La Tour de By 1999 to share with Mrs T.
Purchased a few months ago from FRW @ £102 per dozen IB. They have 6 cases left if anyone needs a solid, if unspectacular, house claret and is prepared to wait the customary two months for delivery.DRT wrote:Château La Tour de By 1999
Hopefully not as "good" as gin in such circumstances.djewesbury wrote:Good sombre?
I was thinking reflective rather than wrist slashing.DRT wrote:Hopefully not as "good" as gin in such circumstances.djewesbury wrote:Good sombre?
Phew. I like your new scoring system by the way.LGTrotter wrote:I was thinking reflective rather than wrist slashing.DRT wrote:Hopefully not as "good" as gin in such circumstances.djewesbury wrote:Good sombre?
Thanks, I was torn between that score and the slightly lower score of 'form is emptiness and emptiness is form'.djewesbury wrote:Phew. I like your new scoring system by the way.
DRT wrote:Sorry, Owen, I had submitted my bid before you told me to stop and am now the proud owner of these beauties...
Try as I might I cannot find any reference to this producer anywhere on the web or in my books but did find "Château Maine Gazin" (note spelling) from the same region selling at £83 for a case of their 2005.
What could go wrong?
The seller wrote:I received this message from the courier - sorry for the inconvenience so i have refunded you in full.The incompetent courier wrote:We have been informed by our depot that this parcel has been returned to them. Unfortunately this item has been damaged through the network and advise that the parcel contains liquid. Due to health and safety we have to advise that the depot is going to dispose of the item.
LGTrotter wrote:I was being nice before, you're better off without an unknown 35yo St Emillion. Put a bet on the footie and try to recoup your Brasil-Croatia losses. *crossing all the extremities*
I am not too distressed about this loss, but I do think it is a very sad way for these bottles to go given that they waited nearly 40 years to be drunk.AW77 wrote:That's really a shame. But you should always try to see the positive side of things: this accident helps you in your health and diet efforts.
I share your suspicion, but it was not your company. It rhymes with Herpes, and I wish it on the git in the white van who broke or nicked my bottles.AHB wrote:Call me cynical, but I always get suspicious when a courier depot decides to dispose of something which is alcoholic.
If you want to be bloody minded, ask them exactly which Health & Safety regulation requires them to dispose of the consignment. And if it was my company give me full details by email please.
djewesbury wrote:Oh well done Derek. You just made me buy 12 bottles of wine at nearly 3 o'clock in the morning. I hope you're proud of yourself
'Made me'? Thats pathetic, there's a man driving around with 77 Warre in his boot, Daniel explaining that he didn't want to buy the wine but that big bully Derek 'made him'. And there's me getting 24 bottles of Graham crusted 98 delivered to an address that isn't my own...djewesbury wrote:Oh well done Derek. You just made me buy 12 bottles of wine at nearly 3 o'clock in the morning. I hope you're proud of yourself
No. From a guy who sometimes sells on BidForWine.com but also sells privately.LGTrotter wrote:BTW did you get the 89 Batailley from BBR?
... again?!djewesbury wrote:Oh well done Derek. You just made me buy 12 bottles of wine at nearly 3 o'clock in the morning. I hope you're proud of yourself
Let's just thank god I fell asleep while browsing winesearcher to do more damage. Can nobody invent an app that can't be accessed between midnight and 8 am??PhilW wrote:... again?!djewesbury wrote:Oh well done Derek. You just made me buy 12 bottles of wine at nearly 3 o'clock in the morning. I hope you're proud of yourself
Forsooth!RPA wrote:This makes for grim reading (and a site which has been mentioned previously on this thread):
http://www.decanter.com/news/wine-news/ ... k-merchant
Take a bat. Although the money is annoying it must throw out your claret stash plans, which is sort of worse.DRT wrote:I might even pop along to say hello to the Directors at the meeting on 16th July at Bexleyheath to ask them why they invited me to buy more from them only three business hours before they instructed the solicitor to liquidate the company.
Yes this is terrible, showing the fragility of the wine bubble. Now if I had some Noval Nacional for sale I would take the first offer over £100, before it's too late.RPA wrote:This makes for grim reading (and a site which has been mentioned previously on this thread):
http://www.decanter.com/news/wine-news/ ... k-merchant
Yup, they have made a big sales push recently, which I suspect based on their business model (this is purely my own, perhaps misguided, hypothesis) was to bring in enough revenue to settle and ship the 2011 en primeur orders, and they have probably fallen short of filling the backlog. I have the (nausea inducing) feeling there will be very little cash left in the kitty to settle any 2012 or 2013 (if anyone indeed bought any 2013) orders.DRT wrote:I might even pop along to say hello to the Directors at the meeting on 16th July at Bexleyheath to ask them why they invited me to buy more from them only three business hours before they instructed the solicitor to liquidate the company.
That has allowed the nausea to subside slightly - I clearly need to do more homework.djewesbury wrote:In these situations the Consumer Credit Act is pretty clear and is on your side. As far as I know, the credit cards have to give you your money back; whether they recoup it or not is their own petty concern.
I'm just glad I didn't use the 'broking service' that En Primeur Ltd were offering. Oh the irony...LGTrotter wrote:Now if I had some Noval Nacional for sale I would take the first offer over £100, before it's too late.
Typical Owen. A measured barb that has the power to turn your stomach as you think of the consequences.RPA wrote:I'm just glad I didn't use the 'broking service' that En Primeur Ltd were offering. Oh the irony...LGTrotter wrote:Now if I had some Noval Nacional for sale I would take the first offer over £100, before it's too late.
Apology entirely unnecessary. "You can turn painful situations around through laughter. If you can find humor in anything, even poverty, you can survive it." Bill CosbyLGTrotter wrote:Apologies to RPA if my remarks were inopportune.
The statement that was very carefully read out by the young Indian girl on the telephone disagreed with this. I was told that the buyer protection clauses of the CCA 1974 did not apply but that the card company's policy was to refund the money to my account and help me recover it by making a claim against the debtor. That is why I am sending in the form and taking a bat to the creditor's meeting.RPA wrote:That has allowed the nausea to subside slightly - I clearly need to do more homework.djewesbury wrote:In these situations the Consumer Credit Act is pretty clear and is on your side. As far as I know, the credit cards have to give you your money back; whether they recoup it or not is their own petty concern.
Got me mine back after this. Not the same thing, I know, but you get the point.RPA wrote:After doing some research on the internet (which never lies...) it seems Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act is key, and should hopefully get us our money back.
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/shoppi ... -purchases
Using a credit card can also be a useful safeguard against non-delivery of wine, which may occur following collapse of a retailer's business. This is particularly relevant with wine purchased en primeur, where payment is made one or two years before delivery of the wine. In this situation, claiming from the credit company under 'equal liability' may be the only means of reclaiming your funds.