Yes good spot. It's listed under M alphabetically.
Phil - could you copy the abbreviation list into the first post which you own? Makes it much easier to find!
Agreed and done.
Beat me to it. Yes, VM is Quinta do Vale Meao not Vesuvio Malvedos.PhilW wrote: ↑12:45 Mon 09 Mar 2020 I'd agree with VDM as most obvious choice, and to my mind no more confusing with potential Vesuvio single quinta as Gould Campbell GC is with potential new Graham's single quinta (i.e. we already cope with this issue). Do we not already have VM for Quinta do Vale Meao anyway?
Alpha by abbreviation, though I wasn't intending to change the approach - should I revert?jdaw1 wrote:Alpha by abbreviation, or by dominant word in name? Perhaps I wasn't consistent: what is new guidance?
Burmester Quinta do Arnozelo needs an abbreviation. BA? BAz? Any opinions?
Agree, BA. Of course, there is also FrA1870 which is also Arnozello [two Ls], a single quinta vp release in 1870 - which we should of course be drinking this year; sadly my last case ran out never ago.Glenn E. wrote: ↑21:24 Tue 05 May 2020 Past practice seems to lead to BA, as we only rarely use more than 1 character except for disambiguation. Does Burmester have another Quinta that might need disambiguation from (A)rnozelo? Even if so, past practice seems to lead to first come first served, with only subsequent examples providing necessary disambiguation.
I say BA.
Done.BA = Burmester Quinta do Arnozelo
The original purpose of these necessitated brevity. Brevity is still very much a desideratum. As is consistency with the printed book. So my vote, in response to Alex’s questions, is a strong ‘no’.
RPR preferred, for brevity.
I'm okay with the mildly confusing possibility of someone having to explain what their FrV actually is. I would like to be present for the explanation and, presumably, the tasting. Preferably FrV vs FrV head-to-head, if that could please be arranged.
Km? If could be Kn, but that is more easily confusable with Kr = (Wiese &) Krohn. Any objections to Km?JacobH wrote: ↑15:35 Wed 10 Jun 2020A new shipper, Kranemann have declared 2018. It’s based at Quinta do Convento de São Pedro das Águias, although it’s not quite clear from the website whether it’s a SQVP. The name is from its owner—Christoph Kranemann—who seems to be an ophthalmologist who moved into wine production via. wine collecting as a hobby. They also advertise a 2009 but I wonder if that is old stock that has been re-branded.
Quinta da Pedra Alta? PA seems natural. Objections?
The website has VPs (2001, ’02, ’11, ’13, ’16, ’17). AR suggested, without enthusiasm. Dow Ribeira became DSR (discussion), as Senhora da Ribeira, but DR was previously used for Dow Ribeira.
No objection to Quinta da Pedra Alta taking PA.
Ugh.jdaw1 wrote: ↑20:19 Mon 24 Aug 2020The website has VPs (2001, ’02, ’11, ’13, ’16, ’17). AR suggested, without enthusiasm. Dow Ribeira became DSR (discussion), as Senhora da Ribeira, but DR was previously used for Dow Ribeira.
Agree.
Disagree - we usually use the brand not the company (though often they are similar/the same), c.f. Rebello Valente not Robertsons, or Smith Woodhouse not Symingtons etc. So I would not use AR.Glenn E. wrote: ↑21:38 Mon 24 Aug 2020I dislike these, because no one refers to them as Agri-Roncão. However, that is actually the company name whereas DR is the brand name of their Ports. So it should probably be AR. For the record, the company name is hyphenated.jdaw1 wrote: ↑20:19 Mon 24 Aug 2020The website has VPs (2001, ’02, ’11, ’13, ’16, ’17). AR suggested, without enthusiasm. Dow Ribeira became DSR (discussion), as Senhora da Ribeira, but DR was previously used for Dow Ribeira.
Glenn E. wrote: ↑21:38 Mon 24 Aug 2020We have a similar problem with Quinta do Mourão and S. Leonardo / Rio Bom. The former is the company, the latter two are brand names. So while we're at it, Mourão declared a 2017 VP (also at minimum, 2000, 2007, 2009). I do not have a good suggestion, as nothing looks correct to me. I suppose the most logical is probably Mo?
I prefer consonants. Would there be fierce objection to Mr?
I missed that we've previously used brand names, and greatly prefer DR in the first place, so switch my support to DR.PhilW wrote: ↑09:46 Tue 25 Aug 2020Disagree - we usually use the brand not the company (though often they are similar/the same), c.f. Rebello Valente not Robertsons, or Smith Woodhouse not Symingtons etc. So I would not use AR.Glenn E. wrote: ↑21:38 Mon 24 Aug 2020I dislike these, because no one refers to them as Agri-Roncão. However, that is actually the company name whereas DR is the brand name of their Ports. So it should probably be AR. For the record, the company name is hyphenated.jdaw1 wrote: ↑20:19 Mon 24 Aug 2020The website has VPs (2001, ’02, ’11, ’13, ’16, ’17). AR suggested, without enthusiasm. Dow Ribeira became DSR (discussion), as Senhora da Ribeira, but DR was previously used for Dow Ribeira.
As far as DR vs DSR goes, I've looked back and I can't see any Ribeira which is not Senhora (da) Ribeira, so having agreed/defined that as DSR then any prior use as DR is simply erroneous and can be ignored, we define DR to be used for DR ports.
Mo for Quinta do Mourão makes sense, and I would use SL for the San Leonardo brand ports (though I think that brand is only used for tawny/white, not for any VPs?).
Only that in Portuguese, the pronunciation of Mourão leaves the 'r' nearly silent. A single 'r' in Portuguese is usually (but not always) much closer to an English 'h' than an English 'r'. So when I look at Mr, it does not say Mourão to me.jdaw1 wrote: ↑17:17 Tue 25 Aug 2020Glenn E. wrote: ↑21:38 Mon 24 Aug 2020We have a similar problem with Quinta do Mourão and S. Leonardo / Rio Bom. The former is the company, the latter two are brand names. So while we're at it, Mourão declared a 2017 VP (also at minimum, 2000, 2007, 2009). I do not have a good suggestion, as nothing looks correct to me. I suppose the most logical is probably Mo?I prefer consonants. Would there be fierce objection to Mr?
Agreed: I dislike both Mo and Mr.
Since “the product is identical”, why not use the San Leonardo name and call them all SL?Glenn E. wrote: ↑00:05 Wed 26 Aug 2020A potential problem with Mourão: they currently sell their tawnies under both the S. Leonardo and Rio Bom labels. I believe that I have also seen that they sell their VPs under both labels as well, but am not certain. In both cases, the product is identical. These are cases very similar to Presidential - it's the brand name that Dalva uses in the US, not a separate Port. So I don't think we need abbreviations for S. Leonardo or Rio Bom... they are both Mourão.
It isn't clear to me what the intent is with the new label. I hadn't heard of Rio Bom being used for anything other than their table wine until fairly recently, but now they also sell TWAIOA under that label. Their own website does not have an VP listed under Rio Bom, though, so it seems that it would be safe to use SL as the abbreviation.jdaw1 wrote: ↑20:48 Wed 26 Aug 2020Since “the product is identical”, why not use the San Leonardo name and call them all SL?Glenn E. wrote: ↑00:05 Wed 26 Aug 2020A potential problem with Mourão: they currently sell their tawnies under both the S. Leonardo and Rio Bom labels. I believe that I have also seen that they sell their VPs under both labels as well, but am not certain. In both cases, the product is identical. These are cases very similar to Presidential - it's the brand name that Dalva uses in the US, not a separate Port. So I don't think we need abbreviations for S. Leonardo or Rio Bom... they are both Mourão.
One could dispute whether we are all full-strength pedants, rather than some of us being somewhat pedantic, but your message is well taken.
ROC = Royal Oporto Quinta das Carvalhas
ROCo = Royal Oporto Quinta do Corval