Page 4 of 6
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 18:48 Thu 07 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
PhilW wrote:djewesbury wrote:This is working so well!!
It is, except for the lack of new page for me to read this morning; I want my fix!
Pages are posted on a nightly basis. Please, form an orderly queue and do not slouch against the reading-rails.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 19:45 Thu 07 Jan 2016
by DRT
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 20:39 Thu 07 Jan 2016
by jdaw1
AHB wrote:Perhaps JDAW could add this functionality to the tasting mat software.
No.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 21:57 Thu 07 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Quiet please.

Re: Port and literature
Posted: 21:59 Thu 07 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Gripping, isn't it?!
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:25 Thu 07 Jan 2016
by LGTrotter
I note the appearance of a niece. It remains to be seen if she is mousey and therefore the murderer.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:27 Thu 07 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
LGTrotter wrote:I note the appearance of a niece. It remains to be seen if she is mousey and therefore the murderer.
You're a very clever chap, eh what?
Or are you?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 18:25 Fri 08 Jan 2016
by DRT
Does anyone know what time tonight's episode begins?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 19:01 Fri 08 Jan 2016
by LGTrotter
DRT wrote:Does anyone know what time tonight's episode begins?
He'll be crying over the Amy Winehouse documentary so not until 3am I would guess.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 19:07 Fri 08 Jan 2016
by Justin K
Nobody touch the cigar!
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:36 Fri 08 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
LGTrotter wrote:DRT wrote:Does anyone know what time tonight's episode begins?
He'll be crying over the Amy Winehouse documentary so not until 3am I would guess.
Actually I'm watching Hot Fuzz AGAIN. Yarp.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 23:19 Fri 08 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
I also seem to have drunk an unsafe amount.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 23:35 Fri 08 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Yarp.

Re: Port and literature
Posted: 13:27 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
A somewhat underwhelming episode. Hopefully tonight will give us some real edge of the seat stuff.
PS: I wonder how far into the story we will get before the Copyright Police turn up to seize jurisdiction from the local Fuzz?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 13:35 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
I imagine that if we delete the earlier pages before a certain percentage of the publication has been reproduced then we'll be fine.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 13:36 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Or I could cease the serialisation forthwith?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 13:36 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
DRT wrote:A somewhat underwhelming episode. Hopefully tonight will give us some real edge of the seat stuff.
Derek's missed the biggest clue so far.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 14:01 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
I was mostly commenting on the lack of enthusiasm from your readers, and did notice the introduction of another suspect.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 14:04 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
DRT wrote:I wonder how far into the story we will get before the Copyright Police turn up to seize jurisdiction from the local Fuzz?
djewesbury wrote:I imagine that if we delete the earlier pages before a certain percentage of the publication has been reproduced then we'll be fine.
djewesbury wrote:Or I could cease the serialisation forthwith?
I think we will be ok

Re: Port and literature
Posted: 14:15 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
DRT wrote:I was mostly commenting on the lack of enthusiasm from your readers, and did notice the introduction of another suspect.
I presume Craven must also have a niece.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 14:58 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
It surprised me that a butler of Craven's experience would not know how many dozens of Ck08 remained in the bin. Perhaps that was the only way to introduce the cellar book as a suspect?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 16:06 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
DRT wrote:It surprised me that a butler of Craven's experience would not know how many dozens of Ck08 remained in the bin. Perhaps that was the only way to introduce the cellar book as a suspect?
A butler can't always know immediately how many dozens of port his master has already guzzled. Especially one distressed by said master's untimely demise. And the very idea of a suspect cellar book - JDAW will be aghast!
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 16:51 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by LGTrotter
DRT wrote:I was mostly commenting on the lack of enthusiasm from your readers.
I was all agog. To the trained mind no detail is too small to be overlooked. The evidence of the bottle is surely suggestive to even the meanest intelligence, I name no names...
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 17:57 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
And now, when you would like this evening's instalment posted? I have the photo here and ready to send but it seems awfully early.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 19:34 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
I think a 21:00 episode would be good. I'll put the Hot Dogs on at 20:40.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 19:48 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by PhilW
21:00 would be ideal, especially in the week when that would allow me to read it at night, instead of the following morning.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 19:58 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by PhilW
DRT wrote:It surprised me that a butler of Craven's experience would not know how many dozens of Ck08 remained in the bin. Perhaps that was the only way to introduce the cellar book as a suspect?
Surely that would depend on the volume of the cellar? He should be precise on entry and use, but especially without OWCs, remembering the available number of all bottles of all vintages off-hand might be ambitious.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 20:46 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by PhilW
It's almost time...
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 21:03 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
PhilW wrote:DRT wrote:It surprised me that a butler of Craven's experience would not know how many dozens of Ck08 remained in the bin. Perhaps that was the only way to introduce the cellar book as a suspect?
Surely that would depend on the volume of the cellar? He should be precise on entry and use, but especially without OWCs, remembering the available number of all bottles of all vintages off-hand might be ambitious.
This is a man who has been managing a cellar for one man's drinking for four decades. He would know, just as he would know how many spoons needed to be polished by the kitchen maid each morning before she ate her gruel.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 21:05 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
PhilW wrote:It's almost time...
The time has come and gone. The projectionist is presumably sniffing meths again.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 21:18 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by PhilW
Looks like we might have to make our own story tonight...
DRT wrote:... just as he would know how many spoons needed to be polished by the kitchen maid each morning before she ate her gruel.
Gruel? Every morning?! We were lucky if we had one bowl to share between ten of us, once a week!
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 21:55 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by jdaw1
DRT wrote:It surprised me that a butler of Craven's experience would not know how many dozens of Ck08 remained in the bin. Perhaps that was the only way to introduce the cellar book as a suspect?
I always know exactly how many Dow 1908s are in my cellar.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:26 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
jdaw1 wrote:DRT wrote:It surprised me that a butler of Craven's experience would not know how many dozens of Ck08 remained in the bin. Perhaps that was the only way to introduce the cellar book as a suspect?
I always know exactly how many Dow 1908s are in my cellar.
Me too!
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:28 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Calm down everyone. A healthy dose of suspense [government note: there is no safe level of suspense] never does you any harm [Chief Medical Officer: yes it does]

Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:53 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by LGTrotter
Thank-you Daniel. I assume we have all correctly divined the true meaning of the question about the pond or stream? Of course, absurdly simple.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:54 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
I hope you don't get led too far astray Owen.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 23:47 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
I am now officially on the edge of my seat. I just can't think of any good explanation about the boy flying the kite. What is that all about?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 23:49 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Yes. Good. Well done Derek.
Tomorrow's episode is really exciting. A major revelation is impending.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 23:56 Sat 09 Jan 2016
by DRT
My breath is bated.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 10:40 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by jdaw1
Commendation for Daniel’s very good theatre.
And an excellent name for a wine merchant: Plummett and Rose.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 17:26 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
jdaw1 wrote:Commendation for Daniel’s very good theatre.
And an excellent name for a wine merchant: Plummett and Rose.
This and all like comments hitherto received I gratefully acknowledge and accept. It's a pleasure working with such an appreciative crowd.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 17:44 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by DRT
Surely it is only a matter of time before this wonderful adaptation of the author's work is
properly recognised?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 19:54 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Are you ready? I'm ready.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 21:42 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Oh in that case…
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:14 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by PhilW
All ready here, but nothing to read...
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:24 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by LGTrotter
It's your time we're wasting.
Port and literature
Posted: 22:32 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
LGTrotter wrote:It's your time we're wasting.
Not at all. I'm watching Jake Chapman speak some of the most intelligent sentences yet heard on BBC TV, while I make a bolognese.
Now do you want to know what happens in the cellar or not?
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 22:33 Sun 10 Jan 2016
by djewesbury
Oh go on then. You've been so good until now.

Re: Port and literature
Posted: 01:42 Mon 11 Jan 2016
by LGTrotter
Not far to go now. Still no news on whether the niece is mousey. Perhaps the port in question will prove to be the 1896. Look out for a tasting note similar to this;
AHB wrote:Pale in colour, a dull burnt sienna, and slightly cloudy. Hot on the nose, smelling slightly of burnt rubber. Oranges and citric acidity in the mouth with the acidity creating quite a lot of heat. Dry and mostly dried out but showing some citric fruit - think of biting into an unripe orange. Strange sensation of tannins. A huge burst of heat on swallowing, which takes a long time to fade but eventually settles into a long and delicious finish. 90/100. Drunk 29 June 2009.
Re: Port and literature
Posted: 10:20 Mon 11 Jan 2016
by PhilW
Will Mr. Egg be able to identify to which other stack of empties the rogue bottle belongs (either by smell, bottle-type, capsule or white-wash)?
Will the real bottle used for last night's drinking be found in the cellar or elsewhere?
Is the niece mousey?
Is Derek's breath still bated?
Only one man (and a lot of book stores, and libraries, and possibly websites, but never mind those) has the answer...