Page 41 of 42

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:01 Mon 05 Jun 2017
by flash_uk
Glenn E. wrote: 19:48 Mon 05 Jun 2017 On Android using the Google Keyboard, switch to number input (hit the ?123 button) then hold down the hyphen to see other options.

:)
Any tips for iOS? :D

Edit: Ah. Same thing works on iOS! Many thanks!

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:55 Tue 06 Jun 2017
by Glenn E.
flash_uk wrote: 22:01 Mon 05 Jun 2017
Glenn E. wrote: 19:48 Mon 05 Jun 2017 On Android using the Google Keyboard, switch to number input (hit the ?123 button) then hold down the hyphen to see other options.

:)
Any tips for iOS? :D
Get a new phone?
:twisted:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 21:00 Wed 14 Jun 2017
by Glenn E.
Andy Velebil wrote: 20:11 Wed 14 Jun 2017 The "hills" by my house are over 4,000' (~ 13,000 meters).
Math is hard. ;-)

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 21:08 Wed 14 Jun 2017
by Andy Velebil
Glenn E. wrote:
Andy Velebil wrote: 20:11 Wed 14 Jun 2017 The "hills" by my house are over 4,000' (~ 13,000 meters).
Math is hard. ;-)
Hahha. One too many zeros on that. Damn phone. 1,300 meters. That better?

And the peaks behind that are higher. Though I think Eric in Colorado has us all beat at over 10,000 foot peaks there. Though I have skied at about 13,000 feet in Telluride Colorado and breathing during exertion gets a bit tougher at that elevation


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 04:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017
by Glenn E.
Mt. Rainier is 14,411. :-P

I've skied at 12,000' in Colorado (Crested Butte). Yeah, the last couple thousand feet make a big difference. Most of the resort is between 9000' and 10,500', but if you go up top and take a couple of those black runs you'll be gasping for breath in no time.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 07:34 Thu 15 Jun 2017
by PhilW
Glenn E. wrote: 04:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017 Mt. Rainier is 14,411. :-P

I've skied at 12,000' in Colorado (Crested Butte). Yeah, the last couple thousand feet make a big difference. Most of the resort is between 9000' and 10,500', but if you go up top and take a couple of those black runs you'll be gasping for breath in no time.
That's nothing; when I was a lad our parents would make my brother and I go t'top of Mount Everest before breakfast, with no Oxygen, or ice axes - or shoes; have a boxing match on the summit and t'loser had to carry t'winner back down while singing God save the Queen, and if we didn't do it quick enough they made us dig our own graves, bury ourselves, and then they would dance on our graves singing Hallelujah. TPF members of today think they have it tough, pah!

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 08:34 Thu 15 Jun 2017
by Old Bridge
PhilW wrote: 07:34 Thu 15 Jun 2017
Glenn E. wrote: 04:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017 Mt. Rainier is 14,411. :-P

I've skied at 12,000' in Colorado (Crested Butte). Yeah, the last couple thousand feet make a big difference. Most of the resort is between 9000' and 10,500', but if you go up top and take a couple of those black runs you'll be gasping for breath in no time.
That's nothing; when I was a lad our parents would make my brother and I go t'top of Mount Everest before breakfast, with no Oxygen, or ice axes - or shoes; have a boxing match on the summit and t'loser had to carry t'winner back down while singing God save the Queen, and if we didn't do it quick enough they made us dig our own graves, bury ourselves, and then they would dance on our graves singing Hallelujah. TPF members of today think they have it tough, pah!
Brilliant!!
MP come alive again.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:17 Thu 15 Jun 2017
by Andy Velebil
Hahahah!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 20:58 Thu 29 Jun 2017
by jdaw1
Glenn E. wrote: 04:05 Thu 15 Jun 2017skied at 12,000' in Colorado
Phil’s reprimand was good, and, generously, he even left an error for others to spot. In a thread entitled ‘Apostrophe crimes’ everybody will have noticed Glenn’s incorrect use of a straight single quote (“'”, U+0027) rather than the prime symbol (“”, U+2032). Tut tut.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 13:37 Fri 01 Sep 2017
by jdaw1
jdaw1 wrote: 19:31 Thu 31 Aug 2017Thank you
I confess to the omission of a terminating full stop.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 23:31 Fri 12 Jan 2018
by jdaw1
Image

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:05 Sat 13 Jan 2018
by flash_uk
I suspect many others are thinking exactly what I'm thinking after seeing this.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:25 Sat 13 Jan 2018
by John Owlett
Remarkable attention to detail: I have a Casio digital watch exactly like that one.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 19:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018
by flash_uk
idj123 wrote: 17:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018 Yes please! Does OBV count as an 'awful shipper's?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:56 Sat 10 Mar 2018
by jdaw1
flash_uk wrote: 19:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018
idj123 wrote: 17:12 Sun 18 Feb 2018Yes please! Does OBV count as an 'awful shipper's?
Flash is being hard. In the first post of that thread the theme had included the requirement “no awful shippers”. It could be that Ian was trying to quote, to copy the pluralisation of the original, whilst recognising that the new grammatical context required a singular. It was done clumsily, but I would not have rebuked this — indeed, didn’t.

Maybe I’m just becoming gentle in my dotage.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:01 Sun 11 Mar 2018
by idj123
This was typographical rather than grammatical with the second quotation mark inadvertently being inserted before the 's' rather than after and thus becoming an unintentional apostrophe.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:25 Sun 11 Mar 2018
by flash_uk
I think it would be better to claim that autocorrect inserted the s at the end, as the presence of “an” means shipper must be singular.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:06 Sun 11 Mar 2018
by jdaw1
flash_uk wrote: 16:25 Sun 11 Mar 2018I think it would be better to claim that autocorrect inserted the s at the end, as the presence of “an” means shipper must be singular.
jdaw1 wrote: 14:56 Sat 10 Mar 2018In the first post of that thread the theme had included the requirement “no awful shippers”. It could be that Ian was trying to quote, to copy the pluralisation of the original

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 23:01 Sun 11 Mar 2018
by flash_uk
jdaw1 wrote: 22:06 Sun 11 Mar 2018
flash_uk wrote: 16:25 Sun 11 Mar 2018I think it would be better to claim that autocorrect inserted the s at the end, as the presence of “an” means shipper must be singular.
jdaw1 wrote: 14:56 Sat 10 Mar 2018In the first post of that thread the theme had included the requirement “no awful shippers”. It could be that Ian was trying to quote, to copy the pluralisation of the original
Yes "no awful shippers" in the first post, but if one then discusses a single bottle, the question would be is it "an awful shipper". Can't have "an awful shippers".

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 23:23 Sun 11 Mar 2018
by jdaw1
He wanted to quote my original.

Yes, I agree, the sentence could have tortured a bit (“would OBV breach “no awful shippers”?”), but I sufficiently sympathetic to the mixed pluralisation from the quotation.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 21:50 Sat 31 Mar 2018
by jdaw1
It is very unlikely that this is correct:

Image

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 11:59 Tue 03 Apr 2018
by Alex Bridgeman
I think this is debateable. I would have said " readers' " but each of the many true stories would have come from a single individual reader. If that was the case, would the use have been acceptable?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:12 Tue 03 Apr 2018
by jdaw1
AHB wrote: 11:59 Tue 03 Apr 2018I think this is debateable. I would have said " readers' " but each of the many true stories would have come from a single individual reader. If that was the case, would the use have been acceptable?
Unless a single reader supplied all the stories, it’s wrong. Compare: the boys’ oranges: each boy allocated on orange, still, multiple boys.

Consistent with:
jdaw1 wrote: 21:50 Sat 31 Mar 2018It is very unlikely that this is correct

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 12:39 Fri 13 Apr 2018
by DRT
From The Metro's article on Gateshead Council’s ‘smoke screen’ denial about 5G in their street lights, and spectacular in more ways than one...
Kim Newton wrote:My dads sisters daughters boyfriend’s sister works in at bewicks and she says its true, she thinks she heard 2 councillors discussing it over chocolate chip muffins.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:03 Sat 28 Jul 2018
by jdaw1
In The Economist!Image

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:54 Thu 06 Dec 2018
by jdaw1
AHB wrote: 17:38 Thu 06 Dec 2018The wines on the night we’re:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 00:00 Fri 07 Dec 2018
by Alex Bridgeman
I didn’t write that! IOS did. Damn autocorrect.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:01 Thu 27 Dec 2018
by Alex Bridgeman
Remind me, are we allowed to report posts by people who have American English as their first language or is this thread just for the admonishment re-educationof the native English speaker?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:50 Thu 27 Dec 2018
by DRT
AHB wrote: 16:01 Thu 27 Dec 2018 Remind me, are we allowed to report posts by people who have American English as their first language or is this thread just for the admonishment re-educationof the native English speaker?
The use of Americanisms should not be reported as they can't help it. Misuse of apostrophes and general grammar crimes should be reported.

The current POTUS is generally excused under the general "he can't help it" rule.

Re: RE: Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 18:09 Thu 27 Dec 2018
by PhilW
DRT wrote:The current POTUS is generally excused under the general "he can't help it" rule.
"They say I used apostrophys wrong - fake news! Fake news. We have the best apostrophys, they just didnt understand what I said. Fake news, so sad."

Re: RE: Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:50 Fri 28 Dec 2018
by StuartC
PhilW wrote:"They say I used apostrophys wrong - fake news! Fake news. We have the best apostrophys, they just didnt understand what I said. Fake news, so sad."
Is it childish to point out there's no "y" in apostrophe/apostrophes; or the missing punctuation in "didn't" when it's clearly a popular representation of a populist representative...? :lol:

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 18:50 Fri 28 Dec 2018
by PhilW
StuartC wrote:
PhilW wrote:"They say I used apostrophys wrong - fake news! Fake news. We have the best apostrophys, they just didnt understand what I said. Fake news, so sad."
Is it childish to point out there's no "y" in apostrophe/apostrophes; or the missing punctuation in "didn't" when it's clearly a popular representation of a populist representative...? Image
It was, of course, deliberate satire.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 09:13 Mon 31 Dec 2018
by DRT
PhilW wrote: 18:50 Fri 28 Dec 2018
StuartC wrote:
PhilW wrote:"They say I used apostrophys wrong - fake news! Fake news. We have the best apostrophys, they just didnt understand what I said. Fake news, so sad."
Is it childish to point out there's no "y" in apostrophe/apostrophes; or the missing punctuation in "didn't" when it's clearly a popular representation of a populist representative...? Image
It was, of course, deliberate satire.
Perhaps some random CAPITALIZATION would have made that more bigly Obvious?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 23:18 Fri 29 Mar 2019
by jdaw1

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 13:02 Wed 31 Jul 2019
by jdaw1
AHB wrote: 11:43 Wed 31 Jul 2019On it's own this is a fruity and flavoursome White Port

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 19:59 Sat 03 Aug 2019
by Alex Bridgeman
jdaw1 wrote: 13:02 Wed 31 Jul 2019
AHB wrote: 11:43 Wed 31 Jul 2019On it's own this is a fruity and flavoursome White Port
Embarrasing. Thank you for catching it. Now corrected.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 21:34 Mon 07 Oct 2019
by jdaw1
Holding Mike to a high standard.
flash_uk wrote: 17:11 Mon 07 Oct 2019The Monkey is here. He guesses Warre ‘77.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 13:50 Tue 08 Oct 2019
by flash_uk
jdaw1 wrote: 21:34 Mon 07 Oct 2019 Holding Mike to a high standard.
flash_uk wrote: 17:11 Mon 07 Oct 2019The Monkey is here. He guesses Warre ‘77.
...allowing me to learn that the apostrophe on an iPhone is not where I thought it was!

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:05 Sun 01 Dec 2019
by DRT

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 19:22 Tue 03 Dec 2019
by jdaw1
Fussy, I know.

Image

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 12:40 Wed 04 Dec 2019
by Alex Bridgeman
Is this your new career? Driving the family tall truck?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 13:08 Wed 04 Dec 2019
by Andy Velebil
In fairness, from someone who has had to try to program one of those sign boards on more than one occasion, I can attest they aren't always easy and they don't always allow you to enter things the way you intended. And you shouldn't take pics when you are operating a motor vehicle.

Re: RE: Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:17 Wed 04 Dec 2019
by jdaw1
Andy Velebil wrote:In fairness, from someone who has had to try to program one of those sign boards on more than one occasion, I can attest they aren't always easy and they don't always allow you to enter things the way you intended. And you shouldn't take pics when you are operating a motor vehicle.
I was standing on the pavement, waiting for a bus.

Indeed, the Wisemanmobile is being sold for scrap.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:14 Sat 08 Feb 2020
by jdaw1
There is much that could be said about the Trump impeachment. And I realise that this may well be the least of it. Nonetheless:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51408704
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/07/trump-i ... house.html
https://www.npr.org/2020/02/07/80390441 ... awyer-says
why this country now has one less soldier serving it at the White House

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 12:19 Sun 09 Feb 2020
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote: 15:14 Sat 08 Feb 2020 There is much that could be said about the Trump impeachment. And I realise that this may well be the least of it. Nonetheless:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51408704
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/07/trump-i ... house.html
https://www.npr.org/2020/02/07/80390441 ... awyer-says
why this country now has one less soldier serving it at the White House
Perhaps that mistake should be credited to David Pressman as the news organisations you ave linked to are simply quoting what he said?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 23:58 Sun 09 Feb 2020
by jdaw1
DRT wrote: 12:19 Sun 09 Feb 2020Perhaps that mistake should be credited to David Pressman as the news organisations you ave linked to are simply quoting what he said?
It was my intention to ‘credit’ David Pressman. The news sources were cited only because I could not find online a definitive original.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 18:04 Wed 23 Feb 2022
by DRT
Screenshot 2022-02-23 at 18.03.04.png
Screenshot 2022-02-23 at 18.03.04.png (423.13 KiB) Viewed 66859 times

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 23:37 Sat 18 Nov 2023
by jdaw1

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:00 Thu 31 Oct 2024
by PhilW
bbc.jpg
bbc.jpg (219.49 KiB) Viewed 44350 times
and/or
bbc2.jpg
bbc2.jpg (34.09 KiB) Viewed 44350 times

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:31 Thu 31 Oct 2024
by MigSU
Inexcusable. It doesn't even make sense, there's no need for an apostrophe anywhere in that sentence.