ThePortForum.com

Posted: **13:39 Fri 04 Dec 2015**

flash_uk wrote:Might that be close to the BFT for 2016? Haven't seen a date yet for that.

jdaw1 wrote:
Starting the thread entitled [url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=10426]BFT, Friday 22nd April 2016[/url], jdaw1 wrote:This thread is hold plans relating to the BFT 2016, which will be on Friday 22^nd April 2016.

Posted: **06:39 Mon 07 Dec 2015**

I have 70, 77, 83, 85, 91, 94, 2000 and 2007

Axel

Posted: **12:59 Fri 19 Feb 2016**

Given Daniel's absence is this now to held at a date other than 21 April 2016?

Posted: **13:11 Fri 19 Feb 2016**

idj123 wrote:Given Daniel's absence is this now to held at a date other than 21 April 2016?

That would make sense. We could maybe do something a bit less structured before the BFT?

Posted: **18:40 Fri 19 Feb 2016**

Can't commit to the date (april 21) just yet, but would love to attend.

Pencil me in?

Posted: **20:09 Fri 26 Feb 2016**

Finally I can make it to another tasting of TPF on the 21st.

Posted: **14:51 Tue 08 Mar 2016**

I would love to attend this event

I have GC03, 94, 83, 80, 77, 75, 70, 66
I may also have 27.

Posted: **19:50 Tue 08 Mar 2016**

forest26 wrote:I would love to attend this event

I have GC03, 94, 83, 80, 77, 75, 70, 66
I may also have 27.

Just to confirm... This is no longer going ahead on the 21st April as Daniel cannot attend, so will be rearranged for another date. There is now another thread for a tasting on the 21st April now.

Posted: **20:52 Mon 04 Apr 2016**

I would be very interested to attend when there is a final date for this event. Thank you

Posted: **16:36 Fri 15 Apr 2016**

This thread seems to have gone under my radar...

Have the following vintages of GC:

1924
1934
1966
1970
1975
1977
1983
1985*
1991*
1994
2000*
2003*

*These are still in their owcs which I'd rather not open just yet..

Posted: **17:25 Fri 15 Apr 2016**

In the first post jdaw1 wrote:Vintages:

1924 (THRA);

1927 (TC?);

1934 (THRA);

1963 (AHB);

1966 (AHB, TC, THRA);

1970 (MPM, IDJ, AP, TC, THRA);

1975 (TC, THRA);

1977 (CPR, AHB, AP, TC, THRA);

1980 (MPM, AHB, TC);

1983 (SCD, CPR, AP, TC, THRA);

1985 (MPM, AP);

1991 AHB, AP);

1994 (CPR, AHB, AP, TC, THRA);

2000 (AP);

2003 (AHB, TC, JDAW believed GC);

2007 (AP).

First post edited. We need a new date. Perhaps our fearless leader could suggest dates?

Recent declarations: 1896, 1900, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1917, 1920, 1922, 1922, 1924, 1927, 1934, 1942?, 1945, 1955, 1960, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1975, 1977, 1980, 1983, 1985, 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2003, and 2007.

So we are missing 1896, 1900, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1917, 1920, 1922, 1922, 1942?, 1945, 1955, 1960, 1997.

Posted: **14:31 Tue 03 May 2016**

Has anyone heard from Daniel recently? It would be nice to nudge this tasting back onto the agenda.

Posted: **07:26 Sat 28 May 2016**

do we have a date for this yet?

Posted: **16:22 Sat 04 Jun 2016**

Quick question. Mayson reports that Gould Campbell went to the Symingtons in 1970. Had GC previously been part of Graham? Or was that a separate deal in 1970?

Posted: **15:01 Sun 05 Jun 2016**

I had always thought it was a separate deal, but now that you mention it, I haven't found anywhere online the entity that sold the brand to the Symingtons.

Tellingly, there is no Wikipedia for GC, no website for GC, and no acknowledgment that the brand even exists at several Symington establishments (e.g., Dow's Bomfim Lodge, etc).

The legacy of Garret Gould deserves a modern champion. A visionary and a risk taker. A person passionate about sharing the joy of vintage port with the world.

Watch this space...

Posted: **16:05 Sun 05 Jun 2016**

A request for the answer has been sent to a Symington.

Posted: **14:34 Sun 18 Dec 2016**

We are interested in coming, depending on when it is taking place. Sten, Stefan and Jorgen

Posted: **13:25 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

At a small gathering last night I found myself volunteering (being volunteered?) to take on the mantle of progressing this blessed GC vertical. So the first job is to select a date and so as October (2017) was mooted last night let's plump for Monday 9 October 2017 (at the B&F-subject to availability).

Second job is to ask for reconfirmations of attendance for those that originally signed up (who will receive priority )plus confirmations from anyone else still to show their hand. At the same time as the aforementioned please once again confirm what GC you have and would be willing to provide?

Am open to views but my suggestion is that we go as deep as practicable and up to (and including) 1994.

Third job is just to ask for some support from the Administrators (JDAW?) in tidying matters up (post and link-wise) since my capabilities are sorely limited in this regard.

Posted: **13:32 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

idj123 wrote:Second job is to ask for reconfirmations of attendance for those that originally signed up (who will receive priority )plus confirmations from anyone else still to show their hand. At the same time as the aforementioned please once again confirm what GC you have and would be willing to provide?

This still applies...

DRT wrote:I'm in.
...
I have exactly none.

Best of luck

Posted: **13:41 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

B&F closes 10pm on Mondays. Is there a reason why not Tuesday?

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Posted: **15:10 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

Yes please... I only have a 1983 to offer for this tasting if I can please.
Good work Ian!

Posted: **15:35 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

Good man for volunteering Ian

Still in, 9th or 10th of October both good for me. Can still offer those currently listed in the top post.

Posted: **17:16 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

idj123 wrote:Second job is to ask for reconfirmations of attendance for those that originally signed up (who will receive priority )plus confirmations from anyone else still to show their hand. At the same time as the aforementioned please once again confirm what GC you have and would be willing to provide?

Shows hand.

I have twice as much GC as Derek...
(i.e. also none).

Posted: **17:30 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

I'd like to come please. Either date in October good. I have 1980.

Posted: **23:29 Thu 05 Jan 2017**

jdaw1, in and re the first post, wrote:On Thu 05 Jan 2017 the poster was changed from djewesbury to idj123, to give the latter control over this post and the title of the thread. — jdaw1.

Ian: when a date is selected please edit the first post to add it to the title.

Posted: **02:39 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

jdaw1 wrote:
jdaw1, in and re the first post, wrote:On Thu 05 Jan 2017 the poster was changed from djewesbury to idj123, to give the latter control over this post and the title of the thread. — jdaw1.
Ian: when a date is selected please edit the first post to add it to the title.

I wonder what Schubert would have thought of the ownership of his Symphony No. 8 being handed to Beethoven simply because he had not yet finished it?

Perhaps this Lagavulin is making me think too deeply?

Posted: **09:13 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

“not yet finished” ≠ abandoned

Posted: **10:15 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

Yes please.

I have GC77 in both singles and magnums.

Posted: **10:49 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
jdaw1, in and re the first post, wrote:On Thu 05 Jan 2017 the poster was changed from djewesbury to idj123, to give the latter control over this post and the title of the thread. — jdaw1.
Ian: when a date is selected please edit the first post to add it to the title.
I wonder what Schubert would have thought of the ownership of his Symphony No. 8 being handed to Beethoven simply because he had not yet finished it?

Perhaps this Lagavulin is making me think too deeply?

Beethoven died a year before Schubert. What plans have you got for Ian? How long before he realises why I didn't proceed with this poisoned chalice?

Posted: **13:48 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

jdaw1 wrote:B&F closes 10pm on Mondays. Is there a reason why not Tuesday?

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Only picked a Monday as this is when we have tended to hold tastings. However, happy to slightly revise the date fort this tasting to be Tuesday 10 October 2017.

djewesbury wrote:
DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
jdaw1, in and re the first post, wrote:On Thu 05 Jan 2017 the poster was changed from djewesbury to idj123, to give the latter control over this post and the title of the thread. — jdaw1.
Ian: when a date is selected please edit the first post to add it to the title.
I wonder what Schubert would have thought of the ownership of his Symphony No. 8 being handed to Beethoven simply because he had not yet finished it?

Perhaps this Lagavulin is making me think too deeply?
Beethoven died a year before Schubert. What plans have you got for Ian? How long before he realises why I didn't proceed with this poisoned chalice?

Mr J, you have omitted to reaffirm your attendance. Would I be correct in inferring a declinature?

Posted: **14:13 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

Include me in, with a GC 1977 in single or mag or both.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Posted: **17:14 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

Hi,
I reconfirm my own attendance, as well as Sten and Stefan.
I'll return with what vintages I have.

Posted: **17:18 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

9th or 10th both work well, I am in. Thank you resurrecting this!

I have 66, 70, 77, 80, 94

Posted: **17:37 Fri 06 Jan 2017**

idj123 wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:B&F closes 10pm on Mondays. Is there a reason why not Tuesday?

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Only picked a Monday as this is when we have tended to hold tastings. However, happy to slightly revise the date fort this tasting to be Tuesday 10 October 2017.

djewesbury wrote:
DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
jdaw1, in and re the first post, wrote:On Thu 05 Jan 2017 the poster was changed from djewesbury to idj123, to give the latter control over this post and the title of the thread. — jdaw1.
Ian: when a date is selected please edit the first post to add it to the title.
I wonder what Schubert would have thought of the ownership of his Symphony No. 8 being handed to Beethoven simply because he had not yet finished it?

Perhaps this Lagavulin is making me think too deeply?
Beethoven died a year before Schubert. What plans have you got for Ian? How long before he realises why I didn't proceed with this poisoned chalice?
Mr J, you have omitted to reaffirm your attendance. Would I be correct in inferring a declinature?

I'm in. But I should warn you, my childhood nickname was 'Ludwig', not 'Franz'.

Posted: **07:18 Sat 07 Jan 2017**

I'm in.

I have 1963, 1966, 1977, 1980, 1991 and 1994

Posted: **12:12 Sat 07 Jan 2017**

Ian: do you want me to book the B&F (+44 20 7407 1184)?

May I edit the first post to add placemats and be generally helpful?

Posted: **20:00 Sat 07 Jan 2017**

Please Mrs W. to the attendees.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Posted: **13:21 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

jdaw1 wrote:Ian: do you want me to book the B&F (+44 20 7407 1184)?

May I edit the first post to add placemats and be generally helpful?

Yes, I should be very grateful

Having scrolled through the original invitation I can now see that this tasting is heavily subscribed (at least in principle) no doubt partly as a result of the time period over which it has been open and so this is where I believe we stand (based on the starting assumption that all the original respondents are in):

1. Industry Guest
2.DRT (reconfirmed)
3.Ben
4.Simon (reconfirmed)
5.Mike (reconfirmed)
6.IDJ (reconfirmed)
7.JDAW (reconfirmed)
8. CPR (reconfirmed)
9.Tom (reconfirmed)*
10.AHB (reconfirmed)
11. Axel
12. Chris D
13. TC (reconfirmed)*
14. Dia
15. JB Vintage +2 (reconfirmed)
18. Phil (confirmed)
19. Dave (confirmed)
20. Mrs W.(confirmed)

*I have used executive powers to reconfirm on the grounds that TC agreed at the tasting the other night and that Tom is integral.to the tasting

So if all above do reconfirm (I will chase) and we can get an Industry Guest (is someone able to reach out?) then this means that we already have a full complement of 14 and with 6 currently on the reserve list!

If anyone has any reason to take issue with the above let me know.

Posted: **13:30 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

Just to add to my post above I would suggest (based upon bottles currently in people's possession) that the tasting should comprise vintages 1924-1994 (Inc) which has a nice symetry about it. Also means that we have 8 months to track down a 45, 55 and 60 (plus a putative 42).

Posted: **17:32 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

Twenty?! This has not been perfectly managed. Let's start by moving Mrs W. To the waitlist. Bye bye my love.

And some others: perhaps the unconfirmed? Or the late joiners?

Posted: **18:14 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

jdaw1 wrote:Twenty?!

or even twenty-two, since I think JB+2 is three people.

Posted: **18:24 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

jdaw1 wrote:Twenty?! This has not been perfectly managed. Let's start by moving Mrs W. To the waitlist. Bye bye my love.

And some others: perhaps the unconfirmed? Or the late joiners?

I was merely picking up from where it had been left which it appeared was 18 people.

PhilW wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:Twenty?!
or even twenty-two, since I think JB+2 is three people.

No they have all been counted in the post.

Posted: **18:31 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

idj123 wrote:
PhilW wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:Twenty?!
or even twenty-two, since I think JB+2 is three people.
No they have all been counted in the post.

you're right, I missed the multiple increment; 20.

Posted: **19:05 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

Hi - yes please count me in - I have 1927 which I will keep aside.

Cheers
Tony

Posted: **21:26 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

Please keep the numbers to 14 or less, otherwise the pours become too small to be meaningful.

I'm happy to reach out and find an industry guest. Would a member of the Symington family be appropriate? Once we have a confirmed date I can start conversations...

Posted: **21:46 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

idj123 wrote:if all above do reconfirm (I will chase) and we can get an Industry Guest (is someone able to reach out?) then this means that we already have a full complement of 14 and with 6 currently on the reserve list!

I do not think Ian has suggested having more than 14.

Posted: **22:00 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

DRT wrote:
idj123 wrote:if all above do reconfirm (I will chase) and we can get an Industry Guest (is someone able to reach out?) then this means that we already have a full complement of 14 and with 6 currently on the reserve list!
I do not think Ian has suggested having more than 14.

You're right, I'd missed that.

Posted: **23:12 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

Due to an absence of previous management, people have ‘joined’ because it wasn’t clear that the event was already full. The guest list needs to be culled. I suggest as follows:
• Those bringing ≤1955 Gould Campbell are in.
• Subject to which, those reserving / re-confirming particularly early are in.
• Subject to which, executive decision.

There should be a cull. It should be soon. Some people will be unhappy. But it must be done.

Posted: **23:35 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

jdaw1 wrote:Due to an absence of previous management, people have ‘joined’ because it wasn’t clear that the event was already full. The guest list needs to be culled. I suggest as follows:
• Those bringing ≤1955 Gould Campbell are in.
• Subject to which, those reserving / re-confirming particularly early are in.
• Subject to which, executive decision.

There should be a cull. It should be soon. Some people will be unhappy. But it must be done.

I believe Ian was asked to take on the organisation. I think his initial statement of intent was sufficient without any of us interfering...

idj123 wrote:Second job is to ask for reconfirmations of attendance for those that originally signed up (who will receive priority )plus confirmations from anyone else still to show their hand.

My understanding is the Ian is firstly asking those who had already confirmed whether or not they wish to stay in and if so they will have a place. Secondly, he is asking anyone else who is interested to express an interest. Ian has also subsequently said that he will chase the original attendees to re-confirm. That all seems fair.

Let's leave Ian to it. I think he is doing very well without interference.

Posted: **23:40 Sun 08 Jan 2017**

And this has implications of exclusivity that I think should be avoided here...

jdaw1 wrote:Those bringing ≤1955 Gould Campbell are in.

"If you own old port you are part of our club, if not you can have the seat in the corner if there is one left"

Is that what we want to be?

ThePortForum.com

Tue 10 Oct - A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: RE: Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: RE: Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical

Re: A Gould Campbell vertical