Page 2 of 2

Posted: 09:26 Thu 26 Jul 2007
by KillerB
The latest was advertising anti-spamware. I often wonder if they appreciate the irony.

Posted: 11:22 Fri 27 Jul 2007
by KillerB
On Conky's point I don't see the point in having a whole gamut of unreal users. If I had left all of the spammers alone we would probably be heading towards 100 users by now but it would be fake. I want all the users to be real and preferably posting. If that means that other sites can claim to be more successful because of their user numbers then let it be so.

Posted: 14:07 Fri 27 Jul 2007
by Conky
Hear,hear.

The Hobbits are happy!

:D Alan :D

Posted: 00:58 Sat 28 Jul 2007
by DRT
We seem to have an increased number of these - I killed 6 tonight, all created within a few minutes of each other. I have noticed an increased number over the past few days which, I assume, my lovely assistant Obi Wan has taken care of in my absence :lol:

I entirely agree woth the policy of deleting users who appear to be unreal and would also suggest we kill any user account that has been activated by admin and then does not post within 1 month. We will then avoid the situation of having an unrealistic tally of members displayed on the front page.

Yoda

Posted: 21:15 Wed 10 Oct 2007
by KillerB
With a bit of luck, this part of Admin's responsibility should be reduced: I've banned a few names.