Re: 27 Nov 2013, The Bung Hole, 83@30
Posted: 22:17 Mon 21 Oct 2013
That is why I valued it at £0 for the purposes of this tasting.
A place for those passionate about port, and for those new to it. We hold lots of Port tastings: please join us!
https://www.theportforum.com/
Overpriced.DRT wrote:I valued it at £0
Brilliant. Boring placemat question - initials (etc) of your guest?Christopher wrote:I am securing some Niepoort 83!
I'm putting you down for this on the placemats..CPR 1 wrote:I will bring the Warre if that is not already spoken for
Unless you have better information assume Tom Forcier, TF, rightie.djewesbury wrote:Also if anyone is in touch with CMAG, please ask him his guest's initials and handedness.
idj123 wrote:Daniel, put me down for Graham's please.
Ian
DoneCookie wrote:If there is space could you include me please...I have the odd '83 but happy to adopt if required.
djewesbury wrote:I should repeat my request for everyone to declare what they're bringing or adopting
No idea what I am adopting. Tom?jdaw1 wrote:If wanted, I could bring a Churchill Agua Alta 1983, that for some years was stored only mediumly well. So I’ll also adopt.
Can you give me initials please - and whether left- or right-handedidj123 wrote:a +1-I have a friend who would be interested in attending
Ian
Thanks, and thanks Ian... placemats updated.Cookie wrote:I shall bring the Offley Boa Vista if nobody objects.
DRT wrote:That is why I valued it at £0 for the purposes of this tasting.
Me neither. Tom?jdaw1 wrote:djewesbury wrote:I should repeat my request for everyone to declare what they're bringing or adoptingNo idea what I am adopting. Tom?jdaw1 wrote:If wanted, I could bring a Churchill Agua Alta 1983, that for some years was stored only mediumly well. So I’ll also adopt.
Might we need some collective rebalancing if we are to open this?uncle tom wrote:Noval Nacional
Whilst it might excel, I only hold it in moderate esteem, given my experiance of neighbouring NNs (although I don't think I've ever tried this particular one)Might we need some collective rebalancing if we are to open this?
I need an adoption, and choose Kopke. Just a single K to the placemat maker (who isn’t me); and also the ChAA.uncle tom wrote:I have various adoptibles that have not already been bagged:
Cockburn
Feuerheerd
Fonseca (which I think I will volunteer for me)
Gould Campbell
Kopke
Noval Nacional
Royal Oporto
Smith Woodhouse
Taylor
- Please choose!
Please specify that cost (here or by PM) and we can evaluate whether to add it as a group adoption.uncle tom wrote:Whilst it might excel, I only hold it in moderate esteem, given my experiance of neighbouring NNs (although I don't think I've ever tried this particular one)Might we need some collective rebalancing if we are to open this?
Have had this bottle for the best part of a decade, but will let it go at cost.
Daniel: you make the choices that need to be made, and announce that your choices are binding if not over-ruled by 6pm Friday. Make the choices here; PM the relevant people with their ‘choices’ and the deadline; and it’s decided by the deadline.djewesbury wrote:Can DRT, WPS and CMAG's +1, believed-TF, please select from Tom's list.
Done.jdaw1 wrote:Daniel: you make the choices that need to be made, and announce that your choices are binding if not over-ruled by 6pm Friday. Make the choices here; PM the relevant people with their ‘choices’ and the deadline; and it’s decided by the deadline.djewesbury wrote:Can DRT, WPS and CMAG's +1, believed-TF, please select from Tom's list.
Fine by me; will ask uncle Tom for the billdjewesbury wrote:Done.jdaw1 wrote:Daniel: you make the choices that need to be made, and announce that your choices are binding if not over-ruled by 6pm Friday. Make the choices here; PM the relevant people with their ‘choices’ and the deadline; and it’s decided by the deadline.djewesbury wrote:Can DRT, WPS and CMAG's +1, believed-TF, please select from Tom's list.
WS1 - Taylor
DRT - Gould Campbell (WOTN at the tasting Axel mentioned a couple of pages back)
TF - Smith Woodhouse
Tom to decide whether to bring the NN and if so, a suitable amount for those wishing to buy in.
Tom, this seems fair. Please make the appropriate calculations.uncle tom wrote:Re. Adoptions..
There is a large disparity between the cost of bottles - would the adopters prefer me to average them out??
That seems very fair.uncle tom wrote:Re. Adoptions..
There is a large disparity between the cost of bottles - would the adopters prefer me to average them out??
This is worth bearing in mind.DRT wrote:Based on numerous previous experiences, including a number tasted at the quinta, I expect the NN83 to be nothing other than very disappointing. It isn't just bad NN, it is bad VP.
This seems preposterous. I've had the NN84 before, and while it was not exceptional, it was also not bad. Tasted blind, I believe I rated it 84 points. Is NN83 dramatically worse than NN84?DRT wrote:Based on numerous previous experiences, including a number tasted at the quinta, I expect the NN83 to be nothing other than very disappointing. It isn't just bad NN, it is bad VP.
Glenn E. wrote:This seems preposterous. I've had the NN84 before, and while it was not exceptional, it was also not bad. Tasted blind, I believe I rated it 84 points. Is NN83 dramatically worse than NN84?DRT wrote:Based on numerous previous experiences, including a number tasted at the quinta, I expect the NN83 to be nothing other than very disappointing. It isn't just bad NN, it is bad VP.
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=18555#p18555]Here[/url] SushiNorth wrote:Caramel apple red in color, this Quinta do Noval Nacional 1983 was hopefully just an off bottle. Beyond the heat in the nose was an intense and overpowering smell of celery, followed by fennel seeds, chocolate, and (per EricD) Rhubarb. I never found jdaw's passionfruit, nor did the celery diminish or orange peel evolve as some suggested late in the evening. To taste, it was all celery, with fruit beneath and a touch of licorice. (no score)
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=40024#p40024]Here[/url] jdaw1 wrote:NN83, #1: red-brown, 40% opacity. Off. RMM ‟not good”. AHB ‟very harsh”. Not drunk.
So I’ve had NN83 thrice: one ‟off bottle”, one ‟not good”, the best ‟Utterly unremarkable”.[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=40025#p40025]Here[/url] jdaw1 wrote:NN83, #2: red-brown, 40% opacity. No nose recorded. To taste heat. Light. ‟Utterly unremarkable”, I wrote, before remarking ‟Good weight into good length unctuous sweetness”.
A good friend from Germany just told me he will be in London next Wednesday. Since he will bring precious old materials (wine) over for me I have to see him. So I opt out and you can have my place and adoption.AHB wrote:It seems my darling wife has arranged to go out for dinner with her port work chums the evening of our Christmas shopping trip. That leaves me alone at home, kicking my heels on the night of 27th November. What is a boy to do?
So, if there's still space, I am in. Just need to look at the list of who is bringing what and see whether I need to adopt from Tom or if I have something at home that isn't already represented.
Thanks Wolfgang.AHB wrote:So, if there's still space, I am in. Just need to look at the list of who is bringing what and see whether I need to adopt from Tom or if I have something at home that isn't already represented.
Sorry not to see you there Wolfgang; welcome Alex.WS1 wrote:A good friend from Germany just told me he will be in London next Wednesday. Since he will bring precious old materials (wine) over for me I have to see him. So I opt out and you can have my place and adoption.AHB wrote:It seems my darling wife has arranged to go out for dinner with her port work chums the evening of our Christmas shopping trip. That leaves me alone at home, kicking my heels on the night of 27th November. What is a boy to do?
So, if there's still space, I am in. Just need to look at the list of who is bringing what and see whether I need to adopt from Tom or if I have something at home that isn't already represented.
regards
WS1
Are you suggesting we replace Taylor with Cockburn?AHB wrote:Thanks Wolfgang.AHB wrote:So, if there's still space, I am in. Just need to look at the list of who is bringing what and see whether I need to adopt from Tom or if I have something at home that isn't already represented.
Tom - could I adopt please. I'd like you to add the Cockburn to the list of bottles being adopted by the group. I still hope to find a good one of these one day, but don't decant it before travelling to the Bung Hole. I'll filter it when it arrives and hope the lack of exposure to the air holds back the development of any TCA. Thanks.
Also, I would vote against including the 1983 Nacional. While fun to try, it is not good value for money.
No. You copied and pasted before I edited to reflect Wolfgang's post.djewesbury wrote:Are you suggesting we replace Taylor with Cockburn?AHB wrote:Thanks Wolfgang.AHB wrote:So, if there's still space, I am in. Just need to look at the list of who is bringing what and see whether I need to adopt from Tom or if I have something at home that isn't already represented.
Tom - could I adopt please. Keep the list of bottles being adopted by the group the same and I'll pick up my third of the pooled cost. Thanks.
Also, I would vote against including the 1983 Nacional. While fun to try, it is not good value for money.